This is exactly what I have for my home lab, and iscsi mounts for the
datastores. It works really well.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) wrote:
> Dennis, you must have had the same VCP trainer I did, that was a frequent
> refrain.
>
> If you want to go really cheap loa
-- Forwarded message --
From: Andrew Grech
Date: Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 10.6 Standard CUIC Concurrent Peak Call
Report
To: Anthony Holloway
Thanks Anthony,
Its close but no cigar.. For this report I need it for a specific CCX
application rat
How does the Stock > Unified CCX Historical > System > License Utilization
Hourly Report (and then switch it to the line chart) work for you? I like
it because it shows my busy hour port usage.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:36 PM Andrew Grech wrote:
> Hey All,
>
>
>
> Within the standard version of
Hey All,
Within the standard version of CUIC can some give me some guidance on how
to create a peak concurrent call volume report?
I can do lots of summary reports..
Many thanks
Andrew
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https:
Thanks Dainel! I probably knew that at some point, but I couldn't remember for
the life of me! Makes total sense.
Thanks,
Ryan
Original Message
From: Daniel Pagan
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 09:16 PM
To: Daniel Pagan ,Ryan Huff
,cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [ci
For clarity, by “higher bandwidth codec” I meant to say higher bit-rate codec,
or codec of higher bandwidth consumption.
- Dan
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Daniel Pagan
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 9:08 PM
To: Ryan Huff; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Su
Hey Ryan how’s it going? Transcoder allocated by CUCM comes from the side using
a higher bandwidth codec, regardless if it’s the calling or called party, with
the intention to avoid streaming a high bandwidth consuming codec over a WAN
connection – keeping it local to the LAN. Of course, this is
When xcoding is required in the call setup, which side is transcoded? The
called party or the calling party?
Thanks___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
I have CUCM 10.5.2
SX20 with 7.3.1 code.
SX20 is registered successfully to CUCM. I can change the display name, the
extension etc.. "apply changes" from CUCM and the endpoint learns of the
changes and looks correct. So I'm guessing its properly downloading its
config file and applying settings.
Unfortunately you're stuck there. I'm running into a similar issue right
now. Using Webex Connect services right now as a workaround for SSO
support until they can upgrade to 10.x for ADFS support. If they don't
want to upgrade and need on-prem, they'll have to deploy OpenAM.
On Mon, Mar 16, 20
Jabber for Windows deployment will be for chat and phone the CUCM/CUPS is 8.6.5
Customer is migrating from OCS. Their concern is around Single Sign-on and not
losing functionality.
They currently have CUCM/CUPS 8.6. They want Jabber to login with the same
behavior as OCS (Single Sign-on). They
Quick follow-up on this one... The case was routed to the BU. Hopefully I'll
have a defect to share soon.
Another finding - I ran a handful more tests and looks like any cause for DA
failure results in this problem for SNR users, whether that means a mistyped
remote destination number, the wron
Thanks Roger and everyone for the replies, its been very helpful.
Terry
Sent from my iPhone
> On 14 Mar 2015, at 11:27 pm, Roger Wiklund wrote:
>
> We use Acme 3820 with our UCaas platform. Behind it we serve Cisco,
> Mitel, Avaya and Lync PBX:es.
> You can't go wrong with Acme, especially whe
No one really uses the 64 bit browsers. This is browsers not Oss.
https://www.java.com/en/download/faq/java_win64bit.xml
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason
Aarons (AM)
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 7:28 AM
To: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.neth
Ya it’s a common topic… “why isn’t Windows XP supported with CAD/Finesse?!”… uh
because Microsoft doesn’t! though it still works. Upgrade your desktops!
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Anthony Holloway
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 10:47 AM
To: Jason A
It’s the fact the Cisco doesn’t support Window 7 64-bit is a concern to the
customer. Only 32-bit.
From: Kevin Przybylowski [mailto:kev...@advancedtsg.com]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 9:35 AM
To: Jason Aarons (AM); cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)
Subject: RE: Win 7 64-bit not supported w
and what it supports now is all it will support. They are not continuing
the product moving forward. Great product. have used it for years. Call
to see if they were going to support the 8861 as that is our new
standardized model and found out it's not getting anything new. Guess we
will look
However, I think this is getting close to the just because you can, doesn’t
mean you should.
Dennis, you must have had the same VCP trainer I did, that was a frequent
refrain.
If you want to go really cheap load up a host with HDDs and run a FreeNAS VM on
it. Obviously for testing purposes onl
This sounds like a bug or maybe the user doesn’t have the required roles to
access the page?
Windows 7 64 bit certainly works fine with every version through 10.6 that I
have tested with.
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason
Aarons (AM)
Sent: Monday
A customer pointed out that Cisco doesn’t support Windows 7 64-bit for Self
Care Portal in 10.5.
Seems odd.
++
Guess we are out of luck. All of our PC’s are running Windows 7 64bit.
+
20 matches
Mail list logo
