Re: [cisco-voip] firefox upgrade causing issues with CUCM CCMadmin page

Here is the Cisco security advisory for the OpenSSL flaw found in June/2015 Long, Long list of products affected: http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150612-openssl -Thanks, Ryan From: ryanh...@outlook.com To: dennis.h...@wwt.com;

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco CME

Hi Sreekanth, Thanks for your reply. I managed to get this one sorted the next day, just needed a good night’s sleep. I wasn’t using a loopback IP address under the dial-peer’s “session target” which seemed to be causing the issue. Regards, Quenten From: Sreekanth Narayanan

Re: [cisco-voip] glibc/ghost vulnerability

Thanks for the explanation Ryan. On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Ryan LaFountain (rlafount) rlafo...@cisco.com wrote: To add to what Wes said: If you have other UCC products that run on VOS (Finesse, SocialMiner, MediaSense, CUIC) you'll see further differences between underlying VOS

Re: [cisco-voip] Shared Line Appearances on SIP Phones

If you are talking about line side, I don't believe so. Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 07:11 PM To: Cisco VoIP Group cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] Shared Line Appearances on SIP Phones By

[cisco-voip] glibc/ghost vulnerability

I have a customer that is tracking the progress on updates for this bug, http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150128-ghost and most of our voice apps have updates, except for UCCX. One of their customers, big bank, audits their progress on security

Re: [cisco-voip] firefox upgrade causing issues with CUCM CCMadmin page

This is the fix I tried yesterday and it worked, no further issues. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Huff Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 12:55 PM To: Heim, Dennis; Charles Goldsmith; voip puck Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] firefox upgrade causing issues

Re: [cisco-voip] glibc/ghost vulnerability

I’ll lead off with: UCCX does a fair amount of work to customize the VOS platform to their needs. As such they don’t pull in updates and fixes as fast as UCM, UC, and CUP. I bet if you check the kernel or RHEL version you will find significant difference and that contributes to the complexity

[cisco-voip] Opinions on 10.5(2) SU2 ?

Anyone running this version in production ? I saw a COP file was released this week addressing three SIP bugs that unregister the phones (CM crash?). http://www.cisco.com/web/software/282204704/18582/ciscocm.FQDNwithDNS-v1.0.k3.readme.pdf Any of the Cisco guys know whether this is going to

Re: [cisco-voip] Opinions on 10.5(2) SU2 ?

I have one customer on SU2, but it's smaller (around 250 phones) and we have not had any issues as you describe. On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Justin Steinberg jsteinb...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone running this version in production ? I saw a COP file was released this week addressing three

Re: [cisco-voip] Opinions on 10.5(2) SU2 ?

There is an SU2a en route. I would standby for it. +Chris TME - MediaSense and Unity Connection From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Justin Steinberg Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 3:56 PM To: Cisco VOIP Subject: [cisco-voip] Opinions on 10.5(2) SU2 ? Anyone

Re: [cisco-voip] Opinions on 10.5(2) SU2 ?

Thanks Chris, I was suspecting that would be the case. Any guess at an ETA ? On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Chris Ward (chrward) chrw...@cisco.com wrote: There is an SU2a en route. I would standby for it. +Chris TME - MediaSense and Unity Connection *From:* cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Finesse Sample gadget web page

Hi all, Anyone have some gadget model for web page display directly in Finesse? Thx, ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] glibc/ghost vulnerability

Gotcha, thanks for the explanation Wes, that's what I was looking for and can explain it to the customer. I'll let the customer know of the risks and let them make the decision to upgrade or wait for a minor patch. Thanks! On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Wes Sisk (wsisk) ws...@cisco.com wrote:

Re: [cisco-voip] Recommendations for new handsets

We haven't gotten our 8845s yet - but have worked with the 8861 phones for a while - personally once you get used to them the 8800 series really grows on you - and it's a really good looking phone as a bonus, both on the screen and overall design. As already noted, the absence of text over the

Re: [cisco-voip] glibc/ghost vulnerability

To add to what Wes said: If you have other UCC products that run on VOS (Finesse, SocialMiner, MediaSense, CUIC) you'll see further differences between underlying VOS versions between them, UCCX and CUCM. This causes not only a lot of confusion in tracking bug fixes in the platform between