Re: [cisco-voip] SIP analog gateways
I personally can't speak to 3rd party FXS gateways, but I've worked with customers in the past whose VG224s were integrated w/ CUCM via SIP trunk. The two caveats that immediately come to mind are applicable to a non-Cisco FXS gateway using SIP as well: 1) Lack of SCCP supplementary services http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/voice/fxs/configuration/guide/15_1/fxs_15_1_cg_book/fxssccpsplmft.html 2) Unable to use shared line appearances between the VG2XX and non-VG2XX device. Just two things to keep in mind. I've seen this sometimes act as a deal breaker w/ SIP to the FXS gateway. Hope this helps in some way. - Dan From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 7:10 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] SIP analog gateways Anyone using a SIP FXS gateway instead of a VG224. Just trying to compare costs and ease of use. Thanks Norm Nicholson Telecom Analyst City of Kitchener (519) 741-2200 x 7000 ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[cisco-voip] Prime Collab AA and MS AD
Does anyone know if you can integrate prime collab assurance with Active Directory? All I get out of the application is Error connecting to LDAP no matter what I try to get it to do. I don't see any place for certificate acceptance for LDAPS in this application either, but there is certainly a checkbox there for Use SSL. I think I understand why our network guys don't have the Collab Infrastructure integrated with it , but I want to see if I can get around this obstacle if anyone has any tips. Thanks, Adam Pawlowski SUNYAB +17166458489 ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] SIP analog gateways
Definitely a valid point on ECM - it can help with a few errors detected on transmitted page, but consistent errors will simply cause ECM to retransmit again, and again, until the fax fails, redials, detects more errors and repeats the retransmissions, fax failure, redial, repeat again, etc. Adding to this, you can disable ECM from a Cisco voice gateway when using fax relay. When using pass-through, this can’t be done in IOS and must be done on the fax machine itself, but fax relay has the capability to the ECM “advertisement” from the destination fax machine’s DIS, which is basically a series of tones communicating its capabilities (ECM being one of them). If this gets stripped from the DIS, the originating fax machine will simply think ECM isn’t supported and will never negotiate it when sending its DCS. This done on the terminating gateway: For SIP/H.323 voice service voip fax-relay ecm disable For MGCP no mgcp fax t38 ecm Hope this helps. - Dan From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 10:53 AM To: nh...@co.fresno.ca.us; Daniel Pagan dpa...@fidelus.com; norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP analog gateways My experince is that analog faxing over SIP is sometimes a dance. What I have found to work consistently is to disable SuperG3 and ECM on the fax modem and restrict the rx/tx of the modem to 14.4 Kbps. Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Haas, Neal nh...@co.fresno.ca.usmailto:nh...@co.fresno.ca.us Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 10:31 AM To: 'Daniel Pagan' dpa...@fidelus.commailto:dpa...@fidelus.com,'norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca' norm.nichol...@kitchener.camailto:norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca,'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net' cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP analog gateways We tried to put our faxes all on SIP, best solution was to move 200 DID’s back to PRI, sad day……. Thank you, Neal Haas From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Daniel Pagan Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 5:52 AM To: norm.nichol...@kitchener.camailto:norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca; cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP analog gateways I personally can’t speak to 3rd party FXS gateways, but I’ve worked with customers in the past whose VG224s were integrated w/ CUCM via SIP trunk. The two caveats that immediately come to mind are applicable to a non-Cisco FXS gateway using SIP as well: 1) Lack of SCCP supplementary services http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/voice/fxs/configuration/guide/15_1/fxs_15_1_cg_book/fxssccpsplmft.html 2) Unable to use shared line appearances between the VG2XX and non-VG2XX device. Just two things to keep in mind. I’ve seen this sometimes act as a deal breaker w/ SIP to the FXS gateway. Hope this helps in some way. - Dan From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of norm.nichol...@kitchener.camailto:norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 7:10 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] SIP analog gateways Anyone using a SIP FXS gateway instead of a VG224. Just trying to compare costs and ease of use. Thanks Norm Nicholson Telecom Analyst City of Kitchener (519) 741-2200 x 7000 ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] SIP analog gateways
My experince is that analog faxing over SIP is sometimes a dance. What I have found to work consistently is to disable SuperG3 and ECM on the fax modem and restrict the rx/tx of the modem to 14.4 Kbps. Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Haas, Neal nh...@co.fresno.ca.us Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 10:31 AM To: 'Daniel Pagan' dpa...@fidelus.com,'norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca' norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca,'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net' cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP analog gateways We tried to put our faxes all on SIP, best solution was to move 200 DID's back to PRI, sad day... Thank you, Neal Haas From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Daniel Pagan Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 5:52 AM To: norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP analog gateways I personally can't speak to 3rd party FXS gateways, but I've worked with customers in the past whose VG224s were integrated w/ CUCM via SIP trunk. The two caveats that immediately come to mind are applicable to a non-Cisco FXS gateway using SIP as well: 1) Lack of SCCP supplementary services http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/voice/fxs/configuration/guide/15_1/fxs_15_1_cg_book/fxssccpsplmft.html 2) Unable to use shared line appearances between the VG2XX and non-VG2XX device. Just two things to keep in mind. I've seen this sometimes act as a deal breaker w/ SIP to the FXS gateway. Hope this helps in some way. - Dan From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of norm.nichol...@kitchener.camailto:norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 7:10 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] SIP analog gateways Anyone using a SIP FXS gateway instead of a VG224. Just trying to compare costs and ease of use. Thanks Norm Nicholson Telecom Analyst City of Kitchener (519) 741-2200 x 7000 ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] Prime Collab AA and MS AD
Hi Adam, Using latest 10.6 version with LDAP integration just fine (without SSL). Cheers, Lukasz -Original Message- From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Pawlowski, Adam Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 4:50 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] Prime Collab AA and MS AD Does anyone know if you can integrate prime collab assurance with Active Directory? All I get out of the application is Error connecting to LDAP no matter what I try to get it to do. I don't see any place for certificate acceptance for LDAPS in this application either, but there is certainly a checkbox there for Use SSL. I think I understand why our network guys don't have the Collab Infrastructure integrated with it , but I want to see if I can get around this obstacle if anyone has any tips. Thanks, Adam Pawlowski SUNYAB +17166458489 ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 10.5 hacking issue
Sounds like alternate number to me. If they haven't deleted it, try running this from the Unity Connection publisher: run cuc dbquery unitydirdb select * from tbl_alternatecontactnumber where transfernumber like '9%' That will show all alternate contact numbers beginning with 9 and then we can figure out the user or call handler it's configured on from there. On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:52 PM, norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca wrote: All to the same number in St Kitts. Norm Nicholson Telecom Analyst City of Kitchener (519)741.2200 x7000 *From: *Brian Meade *Sent: *Wednesday, August 19, 2015 3:47 PM *To: *Norm Nicholson *Cc: *cisco-voip@puck.nether.net *Subject: *Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 10.5 hacking issue Was it all the same destination number or different numbers? Manually added alternate contacts bypass the restriction tables I believe. On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:37 PM, norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca wrote: I had an issue with someone getting into Unity and calling long distance one evening. The restrict tables were correct but I found the ports on voicemail had the LD calling search space and removed it, and the LD stopped. Any idea how they can dial 9 , is it from the main call processor or is it in call handlers. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks *Norm Nicholson* *Telecom Analyst* *City of Kitchener* *(519) 741-2200 x 7000 %28519%29%20741-2200%20x%207000* ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[cisco-voip] Unity 10.5 hacking issue
I had an issue with someone getting into Unity and calling long distance one evening. The restrict tables were correct but I found the ports on voicemail had the LD calling search space and removed it, and the LD stopped. Any idea how they can dial 9 , is it from the main call processor or is it in call handlers. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Norm Nicholson Telecom Analyst City of Kitchener (519) 741-2200 x 7000 ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 10.5 hacking issue
Was it all the same destination number or different numbers? Manually added alternate contacts bypass the restriction tables I believe. On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:37 PM, norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca wrote: I had an issue with someone getting into Unity and calling long distance one evening. The restrict tables were correct but I found the ports on voicemail had the LD calling search space and removed it, and the LD stopped. Any idea how they can dial 9 , is it from the main call processor or is it in call handlers. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks *Norm Nicholson* *Telecom Analyst* *City of Kitchener* *(519) 741-2200 x 7000 %28519%29%20741-2200%20x%207000* ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 10.5 hacking issue
Other option would be it's under the transfer options. Try this one to find those: run cuc dbquery unitydirdb select transfer.extension,handler.displayname from tbl_transferoption as transfer left join tbl_handler as handler on transfer.callhandlerobjectid = handler.objectid where transfer.extension like '9%' On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Brian Meade bmead...@vt.edu wrote: Actually this query will get you both number and the user/callhandler it's on: run cuc dbquery unitydirdb select num.transfernumber, handler.displayname from tbl_alternatecontactnumber as num left join tbl_menuentry as menu on num.menuentryobjectid = menu.objectid left join tbl_handler as handler on menu.callhandlerobjectid = handler.objectid where num.transfernumber like '9%' On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Brian Meade bmead...@vt.edu wrote: Sounds like alternate number to me. If they haven't deleted it, try running this from the Unity Connection publisher: run cuc dbquery unitydirdb select * from tbl_alternatecontactnumber where transfernumber like '9%' That will show all alternate contact numbers beginning with 9 and then we can figure out the user or call handler it's configured on from there. On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:52 PM, norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca wrote: All to the same number in St Kitts. Norm Nicholson Telecom Analyst City of Kitchener (519)741.2200 x7000 *From: *Brian Meade *Sent: *Wednesday, August 19, 2015 3:47 PM *To: *Norm Nicholson *Cc: *cisco-voip@puck.nether.net *Subject: *Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 10.5 hacking issue Was it all the same destination number or different numbers? Manually added alternate contacts bypass the restriction tables I believe. On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:37 PM, norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca wrote: I had an issue with someone getting into Unity and calling long distance one evening. The restrict tables were correct but I found the ports on voicemail had the LD calling search space and removed it, and the LD stopped. Any idea how they can dial 9 , is it from the main call processor or is it in call handlers. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks *Norm Nicholson* *Telecom Analyst* *City of Kitchener* *(519) 741-2200 x 7000 %28519%29%20741-2200%20x%207000* ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 10.5 hacking issue
The command showed me the box that was changed. Thanks for the info From: bmead...@gmail.com [mailto:bmead...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian Meade Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 4:34 PM To: Norm Nicholson Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 10.5 hacking issue Other option would be it's under the transfer options. Try this one to find those: run cuc dbquery unitydirdb select transfer.extension,handler.displayname from tbl_transferoption as transfer left join tbl_handler as handler on transfer.callhandlerobjectid = handler.objectid where transfer.extension like '9%' On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Brian Meade bmead...@vt.edumailto:bmead...@vt.edu wrote: Actually this query will get you both number and the user/callhandler it's on: run cuc dbquery unitydirdb select num.transfernumber, handler.displayname from tbl_alternatecontactnumber as num left join tbl_menuentry as menu on num.menuentryobjectid = menu.objectid left join tbl_handler as handler on menu.callhandlerobjectid = handler.objectid where num.transfernumber like '9%' On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Brian Meade bmead...@vt.edumailto:bmead...@vt.edu wrote: Sounds like alternate number to me. If they haven't deleted it, try running this from the Unity Connection publisher: run cuc dbquery unitydirdb select * from tbl_alternatecontactnumber where transfernumber like '9%' That will show all alternate contact numbers beginning with 9 and then we can figure out the user or call handler it's configured on from there. On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:52 PM, norm.nichol...@kitchener.camailto:norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca wrote: All to the same number in St Kitts. Norm Nicholson Telecom Analyst City of Kitchener (519)741.2200 x7000tel:%28519%29741.2200%C2%A0x7000 From: Brian Meade Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 3:47 PM To: Norm Nicholson Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 10.5 hacking issue Was it all the same destination number or different numbers? Manually added alternate contacts bypass the restriction tables I believe. On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:37 PM, norm.nichol...@kitchener.camailto:norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca wrote: I had an issue with someone getting into Unity and calling long distance one evening. The restrict tables were correct but I found the ports on voicemail had the LD calling search space and removed it, and the LD stopped. Any idea how they can dial 9 , is it from the main call processor or is it in call handlers. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Norm Nicholson Telecom Analyst City of Kitchener (519) 741-2200 x 7000tel:%28519%29%20741-2200%20x%207000 ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
