Re: [cisco-voip] Phone Services URLs

What is the current recommendation for HA extension mobility (single cluster) I've read about VIPs and DNS round robin. On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Jason Aarons (AM) < jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com> wrote: > I’d like to create a Phone Services URLs and list multiple servers and > have a w

Re: [cisco-voip] building lab CUCM cluster from production cluster

Along the lines of the linux VM, you might be able to roll out a lab version of cisco CSR 1000v VM to do similar thing if you're more handy with ios. On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Martin Schmuker wrote: > One of my collueges deployed a Linux VM that provides a "fake" IP > network including dn

Re: [cisco-voip] SIp Phones on CUCM10.5.2 don't revert to CUCM when go in SRST fallback

Here's what you're probably hitting for the 7800 series- https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCus18070 For the other models, do you see the phones having successful keepalives with CUCM before you disable voice register global? What do you have set for "Connection Monitor Duration" on the devi

[cisco-voip] SIp Phones on CUCM10.5.2 don't revert to CUCM when go in SRST fallback

Hi All, I've this problem: all SIP phone are impacted from my issue. So, when connection to the CUCM is broken, all SIP phone correctly register on the SRST gateway version 15.4(3)M2 at the Branch Site, but when communication with CUCM go up again no one phone reconnect to the CUCM. To

Re: [cisco-voip] building lab CUCM cluster from production cluster

One of my collueges deployed a Linux VM that provides a "fake" IP network including dns, ntp ‎and default gateway. And with also doing NAT it can provide traffic to other networks (LDAP for example). We use this VM for every installation or upgrade. When you're familiar with Linux it's easy to

Re: [cisco-voip] FAC on CME

Please follow below said config example its an excellent doc. https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11147326/how-get-lpcor-working-cme-85 If still not working then take below said logs. Debug voip ccapi input Debug voip application auth Debug voip lpcor all How that helps. On Mar 2, 2015

Re: [cisco-voip] building lab CUCM cluster from production cluster

That's definitely an option. Thanks! --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 le...@uoguelph.ca www.uoguelph.ca/ccs Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ont

[cisco-voip] FAC on CME

Hi all, I need some help with FAC on CME. I followed Cisco documentation. When testing I get the prompt, but the moment I enter the pin (12345#) the call disconnect. Anyone had this kind if issue before or can give me some tips in the right direction? service password-encryption ! card typ

Re: [cisco-voip] building lab CUCM cluster from production cluster

I’ve done it with a BAT data export and import. You can export all or some of the config and then you won’t need to reproduce your IP network. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: 02 March 2015 10:02 AM To: Cisco VOIP Subject: [cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] still trying to wrap my head around cube

Yes CUBE is a RTU license and honor based, as long as the UC license is active you are good to go and the commands will be available. Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA Network Engineer Direct Voice: 443.541.1518 Facebook | Twitter

[cisco-voip] building lab CUCM cluster from production cluster [update]

updated to insert #7, changing hostname... I'm hoping to build a lab cluster from our production cluster. Here were the steps I was planning to take: 1. prepare offline network with DNS, NTP, SFTP servers 2. install CUCM v9.1 from disks, apply patch inline 3. restore publisher

[cisco-voip] building lab CUCM cluster from production cluster

I'm hoping to build a lab cluster from our production cluster. Here were the steps I was planning to take: 1. prepare offline network with DNS, NTP, SFTP servers 2. install CUCM v9.1 from disks, apply patch inline 3. restore publisher from backup 4. remove subscribers

[cisco-voip] still trying to wrap my head around cube

I'm a little new to cube, please be nice :) I have a 29xx series ISR and I need to verify that my CUBE licensing is all correct and ready (I'll be attempting a SIP trunk with bandwidth.com in a few weeks so I just want to make sure all my licensing is correct). >From what I am gathering, my CUBE

Re: [cisco-voip] FXS voltages / POTS compatibility

I doubt you’d need all the features of the Viking LLA-1. I.e. support for pulse dialing, regenerating the 20 Hz ringing signal, etc. I’ve used the much cheaper Viking TBB-1B for connecting FXS ports to a picky intercom system. IIRC it was under $100. Worked fine, although it was not a Cisco gate

Re: [cisco-voip] 79xx and the ITL, without access to the existing phone system

My assumption was that this was a cluster replacement using the same IP address(es) or hostnames such that the phones will register (as SCCP phones there is a high likelihood they will register as long as option 150 is used and they are in the db). The CTI authentication is between the TSP on

[cisco-voip] Phone Services URLs

I'd like to create a Phone Services URLs and list multiple servers and have a weight/preference for Extension Mobility and not configure backup URLs for subs for EM. Am I smart or what? Is this already a PERS request? Better yet, and Android app like Siri that I talk to. "login me in with ex

Re: [cisco-voip] 79xx and the ITL, without access to the existing phone system

Was the 8.x cluster mixed-mode? If so, you just need to get the USB tokens they used. Outside of that, not much you can do without manually deleting ITLs. Any automation program is going to require a valid user with CTI control of the phone. Technically some of the phone models have a way to de

Re: [cisco-voip] 79xx and the ITL, without access to the existing phone system

Looks like he doesn't have a CTI user he can use for this though. On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) wrote: > If the phones will register and have settings access enabled you can use > the Cisco EraseITL utility to wipe them. You can get it from TAC if you > don’t have a

Re: [cisco-voip] 79xx and the ITL, without access to the existing phone system

If the phones will register and have settings access enabled you can use the Cisco EraseITL utility to wipe them. You can get it from TAC if you don’t have a copy handy. -Ryan On Mar 2, 2015, at 9:48 AM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: About 1K of 79xx phones on a ccm 8.X goin

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco custom exsi or vmware standard image for UCS C240

It comes with the drivers. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Rajkumar Had av Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 8:29 AM To: Kevin Przybylowski Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco custom exsi or vmware standard image for UCS C240

Re: [cisco-voip] FXS voltages / POTS compatibility

Lelio, You could do that, but you would have to split out the channels on your T1. Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 10:26 AM To: Ryan Huff Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXS voltages / POTS compatibility CC: Cisco VOIP ,James Andrewar

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco custom exsi or vmware standard image for UCS C240

Thanks Kevin, Please let me know the detail as why? Will PCD won't have any issue. Regards, Raaj Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 2, 2015, at 17:41, Kevin Przybylowski wrote: > > Cisco custom image. > > From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of > Rajkumar Yadav

Re: [cisco-voip] FXS voltages / POTS compatibility

OK, so have a few FXS ports reserved for alarm outbound calling. That could work, but I was hoping to capitalize on the existing PRI connection. --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519‐824‐4120 Ex

[cisco-voip] 79xx and the ITL, without access to the existing phone system

About 1K of 79xx phones on a ccm 8.X going to ccm 10.5. So CTL/ITL is an issue. There are lots of ways to solve this with access to the previous phone system, I know. The catch for me is, I DO NOT have access to the previous phone system or the previous phone certificates (would be so much easi

Re: [cisco-voip] FXS voltages / POTS compatibility

I do. I cargo-culted the below config, but think the bit that is important is the "no service stcapp" in the dial-peer of the analogue port (I see I forgot the "no " prefix below). Some Googling suggests you would have "service MGCPAPP" in your FXS dial-peer, so maybe if you remove that then it'

Re: [cisco-voip] FXS voltages / POTS compatibility

Lelio, You could remove the mgcp service from the fxs port, then create your dial peers (assuming your alarm only wants tone and doesn't need inward). Thanks, Ryan From: le...@uoguelph.ca Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 08:21:51 -0500 To: jandrewar...@ccgs.wa.edu.au CC: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Su

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco custom exsi or vmware standard image for UCS C240

Cisco custom image. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Rajkumar Yadav Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 8:27 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco custom exsi or vmware standard image for UCS C240 Hello, Please help with below query. I

[cisco-voip] Cisco custom exsi or vmware standard image for UCS C240

Hello, Please help with below query. I have the UCSC-C240-M3S2 server and it would be without the EXSI pre configured. (2.4 GHz E5-2609/80W 4C/10MB Cache/DDR3 1066MHz) Basically we bought it for Media sense to record calls for agents. Also we have order the below license for EXSI. | VMW-VS5-STD-

Re: [cisco-voip] FXS voltages / POTS compatibility

James, Does this mean you have an h323 gateway? Right now, I have MGCP, which I'm guessing, precludes me from doing this. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 2, 2015, at 7:51 AM, James Andrewartha > wrote: > > With our security systems I have to remove the call manager from the call > path for th

Re: [cisco-voip] FXS voltages / POTS compatibility

With our security systems I have to remove the call manager from the call path for the system to complete due to the nonstandard tones they send. From my notes on how to configure this: On the VG224s: voice class h323 1 h225 timeout tcp establish 3 voice-port 2/13 no timeouts dial-peer voic

[cisco-voip] SRST for Jabber Desktop

Hi Group members, Anyone tried SRST for Jabber? The client is using a cloud based IM (Webex messaging service) so SRST is supported on paper. Have yet to configure this previously. From what i have gathering so far, it seems like it is a pain in the arse to configure i suppose due to lack of info