Working in a town that is the home of the state school for the deaf, these
issues come up frequently. Most of our local deaf community would much
rather use a video phone connected to a Video Relay Interpreter (VRI).
https://www.fcc.gov/guides/video-relay-services
--
Ben Story
CCNP, CCNA, CCNA Wi
Out of several thousand phones, I am surprised I have never been asked this
before, but I have a client going deaf.
The customer sent this over: http://www.captel.com/captel
I think it might work over an ata, but is there a more Cisco friendly solution
out there?
Thanks in advance!
Matthew G. L
'elo Mr. Holloway and good morrow to you Sir.
I'm not using CUBE-SP or an ASR1K. I was making note that CUBE-SP (which if
you've ever used, is a substantially different beast than any other flavor of
CUBE) is EOL on the ASR 1K
(http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-1000-s
I'm also deep into CUBE at the moment, so I find this discussion helpful
for me as well, though I'm not doing HA, and I'm on an ISR G2. But I'm
interested nonetheless.
It appears to me that there is confusion between which flavor of CUBE
you're running Ryan, and which document you should be looki
CUBE-HA on a 4k doesn't seem very battle tested yet. Clearly it shouldn't go
the way of CUBE-SP on an ASR1k which got dumped.
Some of those are significant caveats though (SDP passthru being a possible
deal killer for me); almost makes just doing plain old HSRP and setting the
client expectatio
Per this:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/voice/cube_mgmt/configuration/xe-3s/cube-mgmt-xe-3s-book/voi-stateful-switchover.html
it says it is on 3.2 or later, but it does have a list of caveats,
perhaps that is what I was thinking about.
Sorry for the false alarm.
On Wed, Apr
Charles,
I guess that is a better place to start; I may be going down this road in a
near future. I have been reading
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/voice/cube/configuration/cube-book/voi-cube-high-availability.html#concept_5013D60352C446769D62736C8CDE87E8
which seems to sugge
Hi Anthony,
Yes, the CSQID is referenced in a few places including the references in CUIC:
[cid:1A095B7C-5BE8-47D5-B684-8087F787DDD5]
But, since this is a system just upgraded I assume there wouldn’t be much
places to reference in the CUIC data too and the script has minimal references,
some lik
Michele,
If you haven't gotten this far already, check this bug:
https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuq61371
Dennis Powell
SUNYAB
On 3/31/2015 12:36 PM, Michele Russo (AM) wrote:
All,
After upgrading from UCCX 8.5 to UCCX 10.5.1 I noticed, in real time
reporting tool, two of this custo
