Re: [cisco-voip] route calls to VM after sending to Route list

FWIW, You cannot use patterns in different partitions as a mechanism of alternate routes. It's never worked that way, so I'm not sure how you accomplished it in the past. I've never heard of anyone doing what you're asking, so I cannot pull from experience. However, thinking about it now, you wo

Re: [cisco-voip] session target dns

Just so you know, they're not going to know if you use SRV records or not, or host records for that matter. They probably only care about two things: 1) They control which peers you send traffic to via DNS updates 2) They receive the proper/expected host portion in your traffic to them For all

Re: [cisco-voip] route calls to VM after sending to Route list

if the call goes from pattern to route list, add to the Route List the next place for it to go. else, use your UCCX and on transfer you have some options there to use. Not sure of your exact problem, but those come to mind. scott On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Carlo Calabrese via cisco-voip <

[cisco-voip] route calls to VM after sending to Route list

I have a problem where I send a call to a route pattern, route list. if I get a busy signal, I want to send the call to voice mail or have UCCX pick it up.I have tried to use the same pattern with different partitions but it never goes to the second partition. I did this years ago but can't reme

Re: [cisco-voip] IM and P Calendar User Permissions

We are trying to do the same with O365 so anyone's experience and guidance would be appreciated. We are trying to get presence to work with O365 and show status on Jabber and email if possible. Very thankful for this group as they have solved many issues for us in the past.Thank you. Ter

[cisco-voip] IM and P Calendar User Permissions

Hi all, Is anyone aware , for Exchange 2013 , are there more granular permissions that we can use when setting up the user for IMP Calendaring that work that anyone has used? There is a lot of reservation here regarding having an account with full mail read/write access. I don't know anything a

Re: [cisco-voip] session target dns

Thanks Ryan (but who really knows when it comes to IOS bugs). +1 Here is the bug condition: > > > > *Upon start-up/reboot the DNS process doesn't initiate a query till around > 18 minutes after the boot up. This long delay results in hostname > configured features (ex:NTP servers) not being us

Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 173, Issue 3

Thanks for the tip! Q On Mon, Mar 5, 2018, 3:58 PM Loren Hillukka wrote: > Nice tips Adam. The failovers to active endpoints was a pain. That retry > invites 2 was a must - the default was 6. > > Loren > > > On Mar 5, 2018, at 1:14 PM, Pawlowski, Adam wrote: > > > > Ed, > > > > Caveat on all th

Re: [cisco-voip] session target dns

Good morning Ed, Just thought I’d toss this out there to be aware of; CsCuy96398 (DNS query delay). While your 16.3.5 version is not listed as a known affected release, its also not specifically listed a

Re: [cisco-voip] session target dns

Thanks Anthony, That was spot on what I was trying to figure out. I've been using server-groups up until now (and will continue on the CUCM facing side), the service provider is forcing the change on the side facing them. Loren: That's an interesting idea to lock in the host resolution on the CUBE