Re: [cisco-voip] webkit via expressway

I hear ya. I’ll probably take the external DNS approach to be safe. From everything I read, it didn’t seem to hurt if you had the _collab-edge SRV record in the internal database, but I could have missed something. By ‘connect directly’ I was wondering whether or not the roomkit would try to

Re: [cisco-voip] webkit via expressway

_cisco-uds is for internal dns only, _collab-edge is for external only you don’t want either in the other. If you have Jabber MRA working, this should work and no changes needed that I can recall. You will want it to have external dns servers. It sounds like you are testing in some sort of DMZ

Re: [cisco-voip] webkit via expressway

Ok. Great. Thanks. I’ll likely setup some application users to test this out (hopefully they don’t have to be end users). Do we know if it works like Jabber such that if _cisco-uds._tcp.acme.com resolves, it will try to connect directly? My hope is I can just add

Re: [cisco-voip] webkit via expressway

You are correct. It's similar to registering an 8800 series phone via expressway. Username and passpharase (password) are the user you have the device assigned to as a controlled device. Domain is your service domain, acme.com in your example. It will look for _collab-edge._tls.acme.com, for

Re: [cisco-voip] Centralized CER with Session Manager?

In case anyone out there ever runs into this situation, I have an answer. In our case each of the leaf clusters will have it's own CER group. These two CER groups will be clustered together. There was a bug around overlapping IP subnets but that has been resolved.

[cisco-voip] webkit via expressway

So, I'd like to try out registering this RoomKit via Expressway for a couple of reasons. Not much in the admin guide about getting this to work. When I reset the box and select UCM via Expressway, I'm prompted with username, passphrase and domain. Now, in my experience "passphrase" is not the

Re: [cisco-voip] Centralized CER with Session Manager?

Let's reframe this a little as it doesn't appear CER can be centralized with SME. CER can be set up into two CER groups and the two groups clustered, per the admin guide. Does anyone know if overlapping IP subnets is an issue with clustering CER groups? It's a Brocade switching environment so

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway Search Rules - Source:Any -or- Source-Named Zone

Thanks Ryan… I will be enabling call policies on the E, so allowing calls only from *.webex.com (regex simplified) from the Any source, and, I found that I needed a rule to allow outbound calls as well – this I made a named source, so calls from the traversal zone I established with the C. In

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway Search Rules - Source:Any -or- Source-Named Zone

Pardon ... “the E’s search rule” ... I said traversal zone. Email needs a delete like WebEx Teams ... Sent from my iPhone On Sep 13, 2018, at 11:53, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: The source for the E’s traversal zone only needs to be ‘ANY’, if it truly needs to be. I’ve

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway Search Rules - Source:Any -or- Source-Named Zone

The source for the E’s traversal zone only needs to be ‘ANY’, if it truly needs to be. I’ve deployed several scenarios where the business only wanted to receive B2B calls from other things on it’s own domain (or a few domains strung together in Regex). Also, using the Call Policy engine (under

[cisco-voip] Expressway Search Rules - Source:Any -or- Source-Named Zone

Curious - what are people doing with their search rules? I've got a search rule for calls coming from the 'net into E and then to C all good, but just wondering, I know the search rule on E has to be source:ANY because it's coming from the net, but what about the search rule on C? Shouldn't it

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE setup to Centurylink SIP Trunk

This is probably their Level3 SIP Service they bought out which is much better. On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 8:51 PM Anthony Holloway < avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's interesting, I just performed the turn up of some CL SIP trunks > this month, and it was multi-tenant registrations

Re: [cisco-voip] TMS Phonebooks and Spark Room Kit Plus on CUCM

Please open a TAC SR. That bug wasn’t able to be reproduced so your info could help get it resolved. Thanks, -Ryan On Sep 13, 2018, at 2:30 AM, Dana Tong mailto:dana.t...@yellit.com.au>> wrote: Hi all, My Room Kit Plus isn’t getting it’s TMS Phonebook (I have a bunch of custom lists) and

[cisco-voip] TMS Phonebooks and Spark Room Kit Plus on CUCM

Hi all, My Room Kit Plus isn't getting it's TMS Phonebook (I have a bunch of custom lists) and I found the following: I have set the option to NO (which is the workaround) but the problem still exists. The software is TMS 15.7 and the CUCM is 12.x I've reset the endpoint and the TMS server