from:"秀王"

Re: [cisco-voip] Unusual UCOS installation condition - sanity check please

2016-03-20 Thread 秀王

Have you tried changing the mac address of your VM? Sometimes it just
happen to generate the same Mac Address as other VM in the network.

Regards,
Ki Wi

On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Ryan Huff  wrote:

> Encountering the *duplicate ip on eth0* installation error for UCOS. The
> IP is not actually duplicated on the segment though.
>
>
> My experience with this error is that it is usually right; in the sense
> that * something* is not compatible with UCOS in the network. What I'm
> not certain of, is what method the installer uses to determine the
> duplicate condition. I believe the installer is using an ARP ping to
> determine if there is a dup condition. The error comes on a subscriber,
> right after the validation to first node check.
>
>
> I believe the network may be using Proxy ARP (not completely sure); which
> to my knowledge, won't work with UCOS. I don't have visibility/access into
> the network but I do need to be able to articulate *why* the
> installer detects a dup IP (when there really isn't a dup IP). I have
> quadruple verified I am using the right first node / security password.
> This is happening for multiple subscriber nodes too (same segment), so I'm
> confident it is network related, not fat-finger related.
>
>
> Here is the Scenario:
>
>- CUCM 10.5.2 cluster over WAN (not sure what the WAN link is)
>- 2 sites; SITE_A and SITE_B (not sure what infrastructure gear is at
>each site)
>   - SITE_A: pub
>   - SITE_B: sub
>
> In SITE_A, the pub install without issue. In SITE_B, right after the
> sub installer does the validation to first node check, it pops the *duplicate
> ip* error. I have a linux server installed on the SITE_A and SITE_B
> segment.
>
>
> From the SITE_A linux server, I do an ARPing to the SITE_B IP addresses
> and I get the MAC address for the SITE_A WAN router (Cisco OID). From the
> SITE_B linux server, I do an ARPing to the SITE_A IP addresses and I get
> the MAC address for the SITE_B WAN router (Cisco OID).
>
>
> Anyone have any thoughts into this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ryan
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] RTMT alert

2016-03-14 Thread 秀王

Hi Anthony,
thanks for your confirmation!

Cheers,
Ki Wi

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Anthony Holloway <
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ki Wi,
>
> RTMT does not need to be "on" or running in order for alerts to be
> triggered and emails to be sent out; custom or otherwise.
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:36 AM, 秀王 <kiwi.vo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Does RTMT application needs to be on for
>>
>> 1) pre-defined alert?
>> 2) user defined alert?
>>
>>
>> For example, this case. I suppose this is pre-defined alert so automated
>> e-mail is possible?
>>
>>
>> Configure the managed file transfer service parameters to define the
>> threshold at which an RTMT alarm is generated for the external file server
>> disk space.
>>
>>1. Log in to the node's Cisco Unified CM IM and Presence
>>Administration user interface.
>>2. Choose System > Service Parameters.
>>3. Choose the Cisco XCP File Transfer Manager service for the node.
>>4. Enter the required percentage values for the External File Server
>>Available Space Lower Threshold and External File Server Available
>>Space Upper Threshold service parameters.
>>5. Choose Save.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ki Wi
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Migration strategy

2015-03-18 Thread 秀王

hi guys, thanks! gonna try them in the lab first to figure out if i can put
the device profile in the production partition.

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Rob Dawson rdaw...@force3.com wrote:

This is the way I handle scenarios like this as well – create a
 temporary partition for the DNs, etc. and use BAT to bulk edit them when it
 is time to move to production. Having the profiles exposed shouldn’t cause
 any issues as long as the DNs are hidden.



 Rob



 *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
 Of *Ryan Huff
 *Sent:* Wednesday, March 18, 2015 8:06 AM
 *To:* kiwi.vo...@gmail.com
 *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

 *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Migration strategy



 Any elements that you are going to pre-stage that are a part of the dial
 plan (translations, route patterns, DNs, transformations ...etc) wilk all
 need to be isolated from your currently migrated phones.

 So the DNs on your device profiles would likely need to be in an isolated
 partition, but the device profile itself probably doesn't need to be in an
 isolated device pool.

 If you do this, remember to use a CLLI or some unique descriptor in the
 description field of all your pre-staged elements, it will make it very
 easy for BAT to find things later on.

 Thanks,

 Ryan



  Original Message 
 From: 秀王 kiwi.vo...@gmail.com
 Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 11:32 PM
 To: Ryan Huff ryanh...@outlook.com
 Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Migration strategy
 CC: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

 Hi Ryan,



 let's say my phones are on a temp partition not reachable by other CSS. My
 UDP (user device profile) are on a valid partition shared by others ( Ie.
 P_Internal) but they are not logged in anywhere.

 Will this confused the CUCM? Or i shall place the UDP on temp partition as
 well. If so, can BAT assist me in migrating from TEMP partition to actual
 partition (P_Internal)?

 Cheers,

 Ki Wi



 On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Ryan Huff ryanh...@outlook.com wrote:

 I'm not, sure I completely understand your questions but I'll attempt to
 answer based on my understanding.

 Yes, you can pre-config devices and users in CCM prior to migration. If
 they are Cisco IP phones, you'll need the MAC address and model of the
 phone at a minimum.

 If they are non Cisco IP phones, you'll need to pre configure 3rd party
 sip devices (which is a different license requirement than a Cisco IP
 phone).

 Place the preconfigured dial plan that isnt migrated yet (on CCM), in a
 temp. partition that the already migrated phones cannot access. As you
 migrate, change that partition using BAT, to the correct partition for the
 portion of phones you migrated.

 Thanks,

 Ryan



  Original Message 
 From: 秀王 kiwi.vo...@gmail.com
 Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 09:15 PM
 To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 Subject: [cisco-voip] Migration strategy

 Currently the client have avaya and cisco linked together using SIP.

 Cisco UCM cluster have users in the production environment.

 I'm are going to cutover more sites from avaya to cisco. Is it possible to
 preconfigure the users, extension number (let's say 87XXX range), phones
 and the user device profiles in advance?



 I'm thinking that if I preconfigure those information, the cucm will think
 that those extension number (87XXX) are local and unregistered.

 Is there a way to make CUCM thinks that in order to reach 87XXX range, it
 will still reach out to Avaya using the SIP trunk? Is there any setting in
 the route pattern can do that?

 I thinking that CUCM will always find a more exact match locally instead
 of through other source like translation pattern or route pattern.





___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Migration strategy

2015-03-17 Thread 秀王

Hi Ryan,

let's say my phones are on a temp partition not reachable by other CSS. My
UDP (user device profile) are on a valid partition shared by others ( Ie.
P_Internal) but they are not logged in anywhere.

Will this confused the CUCM? Or i shall place the UDP on temp partition as
well. If so, can BAT assist me in migrating from TEMP partition to actual
partition (P_Internal)?

Cheers,
Ki Wi

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Ryan Huff ryanh...@outlook.com wrote:

 I'm not, sure I completely understand your questions but I'll attempt to
 answer based on my understanding.

 Yes, you can pre-config devices and users in CCM prior to migration. If
 they are Cisco IP phones, you'll need the MAC address and model of the
 phone at a minimum.

 If they are non Cisco IP phones, you'll need to pre configure 3rd party
 sip devices (which is a different license requirement than a Cisco IP
 phone).

 Place the preconfigured dial plan that isnt migrated yet (on CCM), in a
 temp. partition that the already migrated phones cannot access. As you
 migrate, change that partition using BAT, to the correct partition for the
 portion of phones you migrated.

 Thanks,

 Ryan


  Original Message 
 From: 秀王 kiwi.vo...@gmail.com
 Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 09:15 PM
 To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 Subject: [cisco-voip] Migration strategy

 Currently the client have avaya and cisco linked together using SIP.

 Cisco UCM cluster have users in the production environment.

 I'm are going to cutover more sites from avaya to cisco. Is it possible to
 preconfigure the users, extension number (let's say 87XXX range), phones
 and the user device profiles in advance?

 I'm thinking that if I preconfigure those information, the cucm will think
 that those extension number (87XXX) are local and unregistered.

 Is there a way to make CUCM thinks that in order to reach 87XXX range, it
 will still reach out to Avaya using the SIP trunk? Is there any setting in
 the route pattern can do that?

 I thinking that CUCM will always find a more exact match locally instead
 of through other source like translation pattern or route pattern.


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] UK PRI MGCP

2015-03-17 Thread 秀王

Sorry to dig a very old thread.

Is this method support today? Is it still limited to like maximum 5 field
where we can put them into maintenance mode?




On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:36 PM, VoiceNoob voicen...@gmail.com wrote:

  No you have done some tweaks somewhere to make a partial PRI work with
 MGCP. It does not work correctly without some changes.



 It may be supported by TAC but not supported  by CUCM. J



 *From:* cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:
 cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Lewis, Chris
 *Sent:* Thursday, December 03, 2009 8:52 AM
 *To:* Charles Goldsmith; Joe Martini (joemar2)

 *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] UK PRI MGCP



 To let you know, I have been using 15 channels on an ISDN30 for over 2
 years - in my UK site - with no additional tweaks on CCM or the VGW’s



 Plus it is supported by TAC – Spoken to Joe a few times I in the past  J



 Chris



 *From:* cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:
 cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Charles Goldsmith
 *Sent:* 03 December 2009 14:36
 *To:* Joe Martini (joemar2)
 *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] UK PRI MGCP



 *Note: *Cisco CallManager does not support the configuration or use of a
 fractional PRI when you use it with MGCP. If fractional PRI is necessary,
 you can use H.323 instead of MGCP.

 This can be found on
 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk1077/technologies_tech_note09186a00806fedbe.shtml#topic1

 It's not supported and won't work without some tweaking.

 Charles

 On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Joe Martini (joemar2) joem...@cisco.com
 wrote:

 To do a fractional MGCP T1/E1/PRI you have to configured it as a full PRI
 on the gateway.  Then on CUCM check the CallManager service parameter,
 Change B-Channel Maintenance Status.



 Joe







 *From:* cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:
 cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Dan Greenway
 *Sent:* Thursday, December 03, 2009 9:25 AM
 *To:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] UK PRI MGCP



 I didn't think you could do MGCP with fractional E1's



 thanks

 Dan





 On 3 Dec 2009, at 07:10, afatsum wrote:



 You are missing l3 backhaul binding to ccm-manager under your serial
 interface. Add isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager under serial 0/0/0:15

 -Mus

 Martin Bufton wrote:





  I have a Cisco router connected to UK PRI E1 with 10 channels. I

  cannot get it to register.







  I get the following MCGP debug message. Can you see anything wrong in

  my config?











  73: *Dec  2 17:55:59.251 GMT:

  //-1//MGCP/mgcp_mp_get_not_entity(830):[lvl=2]Invalid

  parameter (pkt 0x67654638 pkt-mgcp_parm_lines 0x)







  Thanks in advance







  Current configuration : 8969 bytes



  !



  version 12.4



  no service pad



  service timestamps debug datetime msec localtime show-timezone



  service timestamps log datetime msec localtime show-timezone



  service password-encryption



  service sequence-numbers



  !



  hostname Cent-xxx-MGCP-GW1-RT



  !



  boot-start-marker



  boot-end-marker



  !



  card type e1 0 0



  logging buffered 51200 warnings



  !



  no aaa new-model



  clock timezone GMT 0



  clock summer-time BST recurring last Sun Mar 2:00 last Sun Oct 2:00



  network-clock-participate wic 0



  dot11 syslog



  !



  !



  ip cef



  !



  !



  no ip bootp server



  no ip domain lookup



  ip domain name



  multilink bundle-name authenticated



  !



  isdn switch-type primary-net5



  voice-card 0



  no dspfarm



  !



  crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-2117350501



  enrollment selfsigned



  subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-2117350501



  revocation-check none



  rsakeypair TP-self-signed-2117350501







 quit



  !



  !



  archive



  log config



   hidekeys



  !



  !



  controller E1 0/0/0



  pri-group timeslots 1-10,16 service mgcp



  !



  controller E1 0/0/1



  !



  ip tcp synwait-time 10



  !



  !



  !



  !



  interface Port-channel1



  description EtherChannel to Cent-xxx-Core-Sw



  ip address 172.16.xx.100 255.255.255.0



  !



  interface GigabitEthernet0/0



  description Member of Etherchannel conected to Cent-xxx-Core-Sw gig

  2/0/19



  no ip address



  duplex auto



  speed auto



  media-type rj45



  channel-group 1



  !



  interface GigabitEthernet0/1



  description Member of Etherchannel conected to Cent-xx-Core-Sw gig 1/0/19



  no ip address



  duplex auto



  speed auto



  media-type rj45



  channel-group 1



  !



  interface Serial0/0/0:15



  no ip address



  encapsulation hdlc



  isdn switch-type primary-net5



  isdn incoming-voice voice



  no cdp enable



  !



  ip forward-protocol nd



  ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Port-channel1 172.16.xx.1



  !



  !



  ip http server



  ip http access-class 23



  ip http

[cisco-voip] Migration strategy

2015-03-17 Thread 秀王

Currently the client have avaya and cisco linked together using SIP.

Cisco UCM cluster have users in the production environment.

I'm are going to cutover more sites from avaya to cisco. Is it possible to
preconfigure the users, extension number (let's say 87XXX range), phones
and the user device profiles in advance?

I'm thinking that if I preconfigure those information, the cucm will think
that those extension number (87XXX) are local and unregistered.

Is there a way to make CUCM thinks that in order to reach 87XXX range, it
will still reach out to Avaya using the SIP trunk? Is there any setting in
the route pattern can do that?

I thinking that CUCM will always find a more exact match locally instead
of through other source like translation pattern or route pattern.
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] SRST for Jabber Desktop

2015-03-02 Thread 秀王

Hi Group members,
Anyone tried SRST for Jabber?

The client is using a cloud based IM (Webex messaging service) so SRST is
supported on paper.

Have yet to configure this previously. From what i have gathering so far,
it seems like it is a pain in the arse to configure i suppose due to lack
of information.

Do i need to go for enhanced SRST in order to support Jabber Desktop for
SRST?

Seems like if the Jabber and the gateway is different subnet, i have to
enable sip digest authentication as well. Lots of things to be configured
just to achieve SRST for Jabber?
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Unusual UCOS installation condition - sanity check please

Re: [cisco-voip] RTMT alert

Re: [cisco-voip] Migration strategy

Re: [cisco-voip] Migration strategy

Re: [cisco-voip] UK PRI MGCP

[cisco-voip] Migration strategy

[cisco-voip] SRST for Jabber Desktop

7 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information