Re: [cisco-voip] Expressways / Video endpoints

[Matthew Loraditch]

If you are doing greenfield with video. It's not really pro-con anymore, 
expressway is for B2B, MRA and Jabber Guest. CUCM is where all registration 
occurs. Check out the latest SRNDs but VCS is only call control for legacy 
video deployments at this point.

TP server is the MCU only and it works in conjunction with a required conductor

Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | G+

-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Andy 
Carse
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 2:40 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <le...@uoguelph.ca>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressways / Video endpoints

I think you will find that the end points register to callmanager with the 
expressways just acting as a firewall transition pipe. 
The tms servers are just used for scheduling conferences.


Regards Andy


> On 18 Dec 2015, at 02:38, Lelio Fulgenzi <le...@uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
> From what I gather, you can do either of the three. 
> 
> I'm pretty sure it all depends on what feature sets you need. And whether 
> your device is supported. 
> 
> In the case of the expressway, you'd need to setup your DNS servers for that 
> specific VLAN/subnet do that only the collab_edge query succeeds. 
> 
> I was honestly thinking about the expressway for on prem connections but I 
> was not satisfied with the lack of feature parity with direct registration to 
> CallManager. 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Dec 17, 2015, at 5:49 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> We are looking at putting up Expressways and seem to believe we can register 
>> our Video endpoints to CM or Expressways or TP server.
>> 
>> What are the pros vs cons of each?  What are others doing?  I lean toward 
>> CM but would like to know what others are doing.
>> 
>> TIA
>> 
>> Scott
>> 
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressways / Video endpoints

[Andy Carse]

I think you will find that the end points register to callmanager with the 
expressways just acting as a firewall transition pipe. 
The tms servers are just used for scheduling conferences.


Regards Andy


> On 18 Dec 2015, at 02:38, Lelio Fulgenzi  wrote:
> 
> 
> From what I gather, you can do either of the three. 
> 
> I'm pretty sure it all depends on what feature sets you need. And whether 
> your device is supported. 
> 
> In the case of the expressway, you'd need to setup your DNS servers for that 
> specific VLAN/subnet do that only the collab_edge query succeeds. 
> 
> I was honestly thinking about the expressway for on prem connections but I 
> was not satisfied with the lack of feature parity with direct registration to 
> CallManager. 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Dec 17, 2015, at 5:49 PM, Scott Voll  wrote:
>> 
>> We are looking at putting up Expressways and seem to believe we can register 
>> our Video endpoints to CM or Expressways or TP server.
>> 
>> What are the pros vs cons of each?  What are others doing?  I lean toward 
>> CM but would like to know what others are doing.
>> 
>> TIA
>> 
>> Scott
>> 
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Expressways / Video endpoints

[Scott Voll]

We are looking at putting up Expressways and seem to believe we can
register our Video endpoints to CM or Expressways or TP server.

What are the pros vs cons of each?  What are others doing?  I lean toward
CM but would like to know what others are doing.

TIA

Scott
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressways / Video endpoints

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

>From what I gather, you can do either of the three. 

I'm pretty sure it all depends on what feature sets you need. And whether your 
device is supported. 

In the case of the expressway, you'd need to setup your DNS servers for that 
specific VLAN/subnet do that only the collab_edge query succeeds. 

I was honestly thinking about the expressway for on prem connections but I was 
not satisfied with the lack of feature parity with direct registration to 
CallManager. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 17, 2015, at 5:49 PM, Scott Voll  wrote:
> 
> We are looking at putting up Expressways and seem to believe we can register 
> our Video endpoints to CM or Expressways or TP server.
> 
> What are the pros vs cons of each?  What are others doing?  I lean toward 
> CM but would like to know what others are doing.
> 
> TIA
> 
> Scott
> 
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip