versity of Guelph
>
> 519-824-4120 Ext 56354 <(519)%20824-4120>
> le...@uoguelph.ca
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>
>
>
> ----------
> *From:* cisco-voip on behalf of Ben
ther.net>>
on behalf of Ben Amick mailto:bam...@humanarc.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 11:18 AM
To: Evgeny Izetov; Ryan Huff
Cc: Cisco VoIP Group
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS
Evgeny,
That’s great, and I was able to find the PDF from the session but I can’t seem
t
o, N1G 2W1
From: cisco-voip on behalf of Ben Amick
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 11:18 AM
To: Evgeny Izetov; Ryan Huff
Cc: Cisco VoIP Group
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS
Evgeny,
That’s great, and I was able to find the PDF from the session but I can’t seem
to remember h
nowhere near enough MTP resources to do that for all the softphones
in my org.
Ben Amick
Telecom Analyst
From: Evgeny Izetov [mailto:eize...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 10:15 PM
To: Ryan Huff
Cc: Ben Amick ; Cisco VoIP Group
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS
I saw a
om Analyst
>
>
>
> *From:* Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com ]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 03, 2017 9:18 PM
> *To:* Ben Amick
> *Cc:* NateCCIE ; Cisco VoIP Group <
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS
>
>
>
>
oIP Group
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS
Ben,
By flat network; I am to assume that there is no layer 2 partition between
rtp/signaling and general data traffic?
On Jan 3, 2017, at 9:15 PM, Ben Amick
mailto:bam...@humanarc.com>> wro
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 9:18 PM
To: Ben Amick
Cc: NateCCIE ; Cisco VoIP Group
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS
Ben,
By flat network; I am to assume that there is no layer 2 partition between
rtp/signaling and general data traffic?
On Jan 3, 2017, at 9:15 PM, Ben Amick
mailt
@gmail.com>>
Cc: Ben Amick mailto:bam...@humanarc.com>>; Cisco VoIP
Group mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS
It's a shame really ... MPLS is far superior IMO, for many reasons. Call it
iWAN, DMVPN, AutoVPN whatever, it is still as
ryanh...@outlook.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 8:40 PM
To: NateCCIE
Cc: Ben Amick ; Cisco VoIP Group
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS
It's a shame really ... MPLS is far superior IMO, for many reasons. Call it
iWAN, DMVPN, AutoVPN whatever, it is still as Nate sa
It's a shame really ... MPLS is far superior IMO, for many reasons. Call it
iWAN, DMVPN, AutoVPN whatever, it is still as Nate says, public Internet.
Try getting a 30 or 60 minute SLA with escalation after 15 minutes from a
public Comcast or Time Warner/Charter package.
On Jan 3, 2017, at
Or take the most approach of do nothing.
My personal favorite is to use codecs where QoS matters less, like iLBC, OPUS,
etc.
So many business are getting rid of the QoS capable WAN and just doing VPNs,
even if they have fancy names that make it sound better than public internet.
Sent from my
...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ben
Amick
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 3:25 PM
To: Cisco VoIP Group
Subject: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS
So, I know this is an age old question that's debated, but I've been wondering
if anyone here has a perspective here in regards to QoS for softphones.
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>>
on behalf of Ben Amick mailto:bam...@humanarc.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 4:25 PM
To: Cisco VoIP Group
Subject: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS
So, I know this is an age old question that's debated, but I've been w
Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
From: cisco-voip on behalf of Ben Amick
Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 4:25 PM
To: Cisco VoIP Group
Subject: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS
So, I know this is an age old question that's debated, but I've been
So, I know this is an age old question that's debated, but I've been wondering
if anyone here has a perspective here in regards to QoS for softphones.
Obviously, with hardphones, you usually partition a separate VLAN with
AutoQoS/DSCP tags, but that isn't applicable with softphones.
I've heard
15 matches
Mail list logo
