ehalf of Parker
> Pearson - Donoma <par...@donomasoftware.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 8:13 PM
> To: Ben Amick; Cisco VOIP
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Voicemail history
>
> It really depends on whether you have regulatory or legal requirements to
> retain y
From: cisco-voip <cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net> on behalf of Parker
Pearson - Donoma <par...@donomasoftware.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 8:13 PM
To: Ben Amick; Cisco VOIP
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Voicemail history
It really depends on whet
I rarely have set an aging policy different than the default. I guess I'm
in the camp for just letting things fill up, and then let the system tell
the users to clean up their mailbox.
If I put a little thought into an aging policy, Single Inbox and other
fancy features aside, I think new
behalf of Ben Amick
<bam...@humanarc.com>
Date: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 at 10:18 PM
To: Cisco VOIP <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Voicemail history
So I was just wanting to reach out and see what everybody thinks is a
reasonable unity message aging scheme? What
So I was just wanting to reach out and see what everybody thinks is a
reasonable unity message aging scheme? What point does it get to a point where
you start having storage issues?
Ben Amick
Telecom Support Analyst
Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the
