Re: [cisco-voip] anonymous proximity issues?

2018-10-12 Thread Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) via cisco-voip
Being EDU I foresee an engineering student’s senior project to create a device to wash out the 20-22kHz ultrasound, making an invisible fence for proximity's ultrasound when used in open spaces. Also, for all of your Proximity questions:

Re: [cisco-voip] anonymous proximity issues?

2018-10-11 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
H, I don’t remember seeing anything on the screen when I connected via proximity. Will have to check again. My head was likely looking down at my device. The idea of macros is nice, but not sure it really helps secure the system while they actually want to use it. It’s not ideal, but in

Re: [cisco-voip] anonymous proximity issues?

2018-10-11 Thread Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) via cisco-voip
It’s not PIN controlled, the idea is that if the device is in range of the ultrasound and on a network that has https connectivity to the codec then it can connect. Users in the room also see a notification on the screen when a proximity client connects, so it’s not hidden. If you want your

[cisco-voip] anonymous proximity issues?

2018-10-10 Thread Lelio Fulgenzi
Unless I am completely mistaken, it seems that proximity participation in a t/p session enabled for proximity is completely anonymous without acknowledgement from the t/p operator side of things. At least one document says that if you are afraid of people outside your office participating, you