[cisco-voip] Caller ID

2015-10-30 Thread Lisa Notarianni
In Call Manager ver 10.5, is there any way when a call comes in through a PRI (outside of the network) to a DID and then forwards to a Remote Destination configuration to pass the caller ID along instead of the default number associated with the PRI?

[cisco-voip] Cisco hardware with built-in echo service

2015-10-30 Thread Sevana Oy
Hi, I heard there are Cisco phones with built-in echo service, do you know any by chance? Thanks, Amanda @ Sevana http://sevana.biz ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Caller ID

2015-10-30 Thread Matthew Loraditch
It depends on where you are programming the outbound Caller ID. The redirecting CSS is the path used to get to the mobile so as long as nothing in that path sets the ID it will pass through. We use to program the CID directly on the MGCP PRI configs in CUCM. With mobility we moved it to the

[cisco-voip] ESXi RAM Requirements

2015-10-30 Thread Anthony Holloway
Hey All, I'm trying to understand the concept of ESXi's RAM requirements, and with 5.5 VMWare says the minimum is 4GB, but they do recommend 8GB for "full features." When I look at this one guide as an example:

Re: [cisco-voip] ESXi RAM Requirements

2015-10-30 Thread Charles Goldsmith
This is purely a guess, but I think the fact that we don't use a lot of the features available in ESXI is why Cisco doesn't have us reserve 8gb. I've never had an issue with running out of ram on a production system, always cores. On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Anthony Holloway <

Re: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions

2015-10-30 Thread Terry Oakley
I add to the UnifiedFX solution for remote phone control. We still are a strong Singlewire shop with their InformaCast product for notification, both informational and emergency. With the drop in support of the RemotePhone software it was very nice to find the UnifiedFX solution. Very happy

Re: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions

2015-10-30 Thread Tom Sparks
I recently did some research into these tools and here are my pros and cons for whoever is insterested. *UnifiedFX, Singlewire* Pros: nice, functional, affordable Cons: thick client, point tool so not great for making available to a team of users *Variphy* Pros: decent, server-based, does

Re: [cisco-voip] Caller ID

2015-10-30 Thread Norton, Mike
Caller ID will normally survive call-forwarding, unless you are rewriting it somewhere. In which case, the solution is to not do that, as Matthew explained. There's a good chance you are already sending the correct caller ID (check out the debug isdn q931 on your gateway to confirm). But since

Re: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions

2015-10-30 Thread Scott Voll
Nice list. Thanks for the feed back. Scott On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Tom Sparks wrote: > I recently did some research into these tools and here are my pros and > cons for whoever is insterested. > > *UnifiedFX, Singlewire* > Pros: nice, functional,

Re: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions

2015-10-30 Thread Dan Schmitt
very handy tools. > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.v...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So what vendor do you use for Remote phone control? > > > > Do you like them? > > > > Pro's and Con's? > > > > We have used SingleWire for the l