Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 9 prompts gibberish

I believe when you upload an MoH file to CUCM it stores it in G729 as one of the formats. Then you could try retrieving it via CLI. Not sure if it will work, haven't tried. http://www.netcraftsmen.com/retrieving-music-on-hold-moh-files-from-cucm/ On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:17 AM, James Buchanan

Re: [cisco-voip] Changing vCPU Quantities

The latest ova readme files for CUC do have a one-liner about 1 cpu restrictions for Unified Messaging under the 1000 users template information, but yeah, it's pretty easy to overlook. -E On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Erick Wellnitz wrote: > Based on that caveat,

Re: [cisco-voip] Caller ID Manipulation

actually using CUCM any longer, which is why I do the names on the > gateway now and forgot about the ASCII Name trick. > > -mn > ------ > From: Evgeny Izetov > Sent: 17/01/2017 10:31 AM > To: Norton, Mike > Cc: Alan Libbee; Cisco VoIP Group; Ben Ami

Re: [cisco-voip] vg224 registered to two different Cm's

Can those VGs resolve the FQDNs? My guess they wouldn't even register if they couldn't but maybe they are keeping some sort of 'last known good' configuration. On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Jeffrey McHugh wrote: > Sometimes restarting RIS data collector can clear

Re: [cisco-voip] vg224 registered to two different Cm's

e the >> pub >> >> we are looking at restarting the RIS data collector >> >> Scott >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Evgeny Izetov <eize...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Can those VGs resolve the F

Re: [cisco-voip] SRST for SIP phones on 4000 Series

I believe when you do 'voice register global' the mode is SRST by default. So you are not seeing the option of 'mode srst' because you are already in that mode. On Sep 14, 2016 1:03 AM, "Sreekanth" wrote: > Mode esrst does not mandate the use of the SRST manager. You can

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS

I saw a CiscoLive! session recently that seemed to recommend the ports and access-lists approach. The idea is that you can now specify separate port ranges for audio and video in SIP Profile. The session goes quite in depth and is worth the watch: BRKCOL-2616 - QoS Strategies and Smart Media

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS

niversity of Guelph > > 519-824-4120 Ext 56354 <(519)%20824-4120> > le...@uoguelph.ca > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs > Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building > Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 > > > > -- > *From:* cisco-voip <cisco-voip-boun

Re: [cisco-voip] T1 PRI configuration on 2921 not matching startup config

I wonder if you only had enough DSPs for those 2 and 1/3 PRIs. On Oct 2, 2017 4:02 PM, "Lelio Fulgenzi" wrote: Well, apparently, CUCM enabling of ports overrides the router configuration. I did have all four ports configured. After deleting those two ports, the running

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port ignore incoming

Under the FXO port try "ring number x" where x is how many times the port should ring before VG answers it. I don't have a VG at hand right now to see the max value of rings possible but it could accomplish what you need. -E On Dec 7, 2017 3:53 PM, "Norton, Mike" wrote:

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP header modification

Looks like the variable in the replace string doesn't have brackets for it. The only brackets are taken by the \1 variable. You'd need a second set of brackets to insert the \u01 variable. On Mon, Jun 11, 2018, 12:29 PM James Buchanan wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to take a REFER header, copy

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP header modification

On second look, I don't think I got that right, so disregard :-) On Mon, Jun 11, 2018, 12:53 PM Evgeny Izetov wrote: > Looks like the variable in the replace string doesn't have brackets for > it. The only brackets are taken by the \1 variable. You'd need a second set > of brackets

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE ignoring SDP responses from ITSP

Could you get an actual pcap from the CUBE so we can look at it in Wireshark? On Fri, Aug 10, 2018, 10:35 PM Benjamin Turner wrote: > I did and didnt find any.. > > I tried almost everything before reaching out to the team. > > Get Outlook for Android > >

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Carrier Service inside China mainland ?

Also have offices in mainland China and AT says they can't bring SIP service there. -E On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 4:19 PM Ed Puzziferri wrote: > Hello Jason, > > > > We are opening an office in Shanghai and we were also told by carriers in > China that SIP service is not an option they offer, so

Re: [cisco-voip] Webex hybrid call service connect unable to find user

They were saying on Cisco Live session that the trunk CSS doesn't take effect for Teams client calling to PSTN, it would be the line CSS. >From here: Cisco Webex Hybrid Services (formerly known as Spark Hybrid Services) Call Service Connect Architecture and Design - BRKCOL-2202 -E On Tue, Sep

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.5.1SU5 from Pub go to Serviceablity and subscriber error?

Just built SU5 in a lab a couple of days ago and noticed the same error initially. In my case the error went away after enabling feature services on the subscriber. Not sure what that was about. On Fri, Oct 5, 2018, 2:03 PM Jason Aarons (Americas) < jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com> wrote: > > >

Re: [cisco-voip] IOS SIP Profile match calling number less then 10 digits

Could try something like this: voice translation-rule 1 rule 1 /^[2-9]..[2-9]..$/ /&/ rule 2 /.*/ /4045551212/ So the logic is, if it's 10 digits then leave it be, anything else gets masked. If your extensions are always 4 digits then could just add this as the last rule: rule 10

Re: [cisco-voip] Application Dial Rule with variable length

Yes, ideally with the proper +E.164 dial plan, you'd route based on '+' route patterns, and then modify the called number with access codes and whatnot as the call exists to service provider, i.e. using translations on CUBE/VG. I see more and more companies using numbers in +E.164 format in

Re: [cisco-voip] Application Dial Rule with variable length

troubleshooting Single Number Reach until I figured out that ADRs also affect SNR (or at least it was in 10.5) On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 12:27 AM Evgeny Izetov wrote: > Yes, ideally with the proper +E.164 dial plan, you'd route based on '+' > route patterns, and then modify the called number with

Re: [cisco-voip] Mask caller ID of some message senders in Unity Connection Single inbox

ng the DN allowed us control > the name display in Single Inbox as well. > > Hope this helps someone. Thanks Mark and Evengy for the suggestions > regardless. > > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 4:03 PM Evgeny Izetov wrote: > >> The following kind of sort of works in m

Re: [cisco-voip] Mask caller ID of some message senders in Unity Connection Single inbox

The following kind of sort of works in my quick testing but it's a bit convoluted. The logic that CUC uses is when a call comes in it tries to match the calling number to an extension in its database. If extension is found, then CUC uses the Display Name and the Extension fields on 'User Basics'

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco TSP Driver & windows 10 (CUCM 11.5)

I installed TSP on my Windows 10 machine recently to demo Attendant Console. I didn't have any issues with installation or anything. On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 9:34 AM James Dust wrote: > Hi Tommy, > > > > I am trying to get a piece of software called ‘Identapop’ working with a > windows 10

Re: [cisco-voip] ESXi 6.5U2 - Edit VM Settings - VM Shuts Down

I also delete starter VMs. The issue was with the freshly deployed OVAs. On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 1:22 PM Schlotterer, Tommy < tschlotte...@presidio.com> wrote: > I have done 3 or 4 build outs on ESXi 6.5U2 and I haven’t encounter this > before. > > > > I do delete all of the starter VMs that

Re: [cisco-voip] ESXi 6.5U2 - Edit VM Settings - VM Shuts Down

I had the same experience. It was ESXi 6.5 SU2. It always happened when I tried to disconnect an ISO from DVD and connect to local host (but didn't happen when just switching ISOs in datastore). ESXi powers off the VM after a few seconds and the VM won't boot until unregister/reregister. It seems

Re: [cisco-voip] PUT Tool Bootables - what version?

Wasn't their excuse with not providing bootables that it was based on Red Hat? It's CentOS now, and still a struggle.. On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 11:52 AM Brian Meade wrote: > I've given up on trying to get bootables. I haven't had any issues with > ones made with UltraISO. > > On Wed, May 15,

Re: [cisco-voip] PUT Tool Bootables - what version?

; > > > > > > *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Evgeny > Izetov > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 15, 2019 11:17 AM > *To:* Lelio Fulgenzi > *Cc:* voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) < > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> > *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip]

Re: [cisco-voip] PUT Tool Bootables - what version?

; > > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook > > > > [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] > > > > *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Charles > Goldsmith > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 15, 2019 12:09 PM &g

Re: [cisco-voip] PUT Tool Bootables - what version?

12.5 of both CUCM and CUC and none of them have the > bootable part of the ISO. > > Simply renaming a file doesn't make it bootable :) > > > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 1:36 PM Anthony Holloway < > avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> That. Can't. Be. Tr

Re: [cisco-voip] Multiple native CI/CH WebEx sites in same control hub org

Yes, you can have multiple Control Hub managed Webex sites under one Control Hub. On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 7:09 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > > Can anyone confirm they have a control hub org with multiple control hub / > common identity managed Webex sites enabled? > > I’m not talking linked sites.

Re: [cisco-voip] Multiple native CI/CH WebEx sites in same control hub org

tone Rd E | Guelph, ON | > N1G 2W1 > > 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 <519-824-4120;56354> | le...@uoguelph.ca > > > > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook > > > > [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] >

Re: [cisco-voip] External call attempts to Expressway E

Check "Expressway Policy Protection" in BRKCOL-2018, it has a good example for CPL. But yeah, the best that Expressway can do is to respond with Forbidden to fraud call attempts instead of Not Found. I wish we could make it 'invisible' like CUBE can be, but per that CiscoLive you'd need to have

Re: [cisco-voip] How difficult is hybrid call (connector) setup ?

I would highly recommend watching this CiscoLive session: "Cisco Webex Hybrid Services (formerly known as Spark Hybrid Services) Call Service Connect Architecture and Design - BRKCOL-2202" Luca does a great job explaining how it all works. On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 10:39 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:

Re: [cisco-voip] Bulk Admin and Jabber

You can use Import/Export configuration with all details. No need for template and can import different types of devices at the same time. On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 8:24 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > > We really need to start to minimize the amount of custom scripts / > programming that we use, not

Re: [cisco-voip] Change last Redirect DN in ISR 4451

This will be a diversion header in CUBE. You can change it with "translate redirect-called" under "voice translation-profile". This is assuming only one Diversion Header. If the call was forwarded multiple times then there will be multiple diversion headers, and I'm not sure if the translation

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection Mailbox

That parameter would work but it's global and can break other things. You could maybe apply a LUA script on the SIP trunk that has the logic for that exact forwarding scenario... On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 1:20 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > Ok – I’m _*pretty*_ sure this is what helps: > > > >-

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco's Website and Find on Page (CTRL+F) Issue

Reader View (F9) in Firefox seems to be ok as a workaround until they fix it. On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 2:12 PM Anthony Holloway < avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, non-visible text is correct, but the code itself is incorrect. For > example, if you CTRL+F for body, which is a tag in