Don’t forget how buggy 6.0 releases were. I don’t think that got any good til
about 6.1(3)
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Anthony Holloway
Sent: Thursday, 12 July 2018 8:21 AM
To: Pawlowski, Adam
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip
That's probably why they made the new CCIE Collaboration use 12.0Since
nobody else wants to use it.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 5:22 PM Anthony Holloway <
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Worst adoption rate of a major version? Or does that title still belong
> to v5?
>
> On Wed, Jul 1
Worst adoption rate of a major version? Or does that title still belong to
v5?
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:06 AM Pawlowski, Adam wrote:
> We installed CSR 12 into our lab and found that it :
>
> - Delivered broken features right out of the box (IMP Database Jobs don't
> work etc)
> - Hasn't been
We installed CSR 12 into our lab and found that it :
- Delivered broken features right out of the box (IMP Database Jobs don't work
etc)
- Hasn't been patched since last November due to low install base
So we're holding off...
Best
Adam Pawlowski
_
Only installed in a lab so far as wanted to try out the Cisco Smart Manager
Satellite aand was not impressed to find the following bug with it where if
you have CUWL licensing it will not loan down to a lower license level, I
had to add extra devices and assign to users so it used the CUWL licenses
As partner and participant in the CUWP licensing program, I am technically
required to have our internal system on the latest software versions.
We usually update within a month or so of release depending on integration
compatibilities.
We’ve since done a few clients as well. I’m not sure what
