Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco WFO QM: "We fixed some bugs...or did we?"

[Ben Amick]

“We added a field and it broke 30 things so we fixed those bugs in the same 
release”

Ben Amick
Unified Communications Analyst

From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of Brian Meade
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 2:33 PM
To: Anthony Holloway 
Cc: Cisco VoIP Group 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco WFO QM: "We fixed some bugs...or did we?"


Security Notice: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please exercise caution and DO NOT 
open attachments or click links from unknown or unexpected senders.
Might have been only internal bugs got fixed.  Any resolved caveats listed are 
supposed to be public bugs.  But anything that makes it into a customer version 
is also supposed to be a public bug and I'm assuming any of these bugs would 
have existed in SR5.

Someone messed up here though.

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Anthony Holloway 
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Just pointing out, what I thought to be a humorous documentation conflict.

Source: QM 11.5(1) Release 
Notes<https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/customer-collaboration/unified-workforce-optimization/products-release-notes-list.html>

[image.png]

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Disclaimer: The information contained in this transmission and any attachments 
may contain privileged and confidential information including patient 
information protected by federal and state privacy laws. This transmission is 
sent for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please immediately (1) notify the sender via reply email; (2) do not 
open or read the message or any attachments; and (3) delete this message and 
any attachments. The review, dissemination, distribution, or duplication of 
this transmission by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly 
prohibited.
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco WFO QM: "We fixed some bugs...or did we?"

[Brian Meade]

Might have been only internal bugs got fixed.  Any resolved caveats listed
are supposed to be public bugs.  But anything that makes it into a customer
version is also supposed to be a public bug and I'm assuming any of these
bugs would have existed in SR5.

Someone messed up here though.

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Anthony Holloway <
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just pointing out, what I thought to be a humorous documentation conflict.
>
> Source: QM 11.5(1) Release Notes
> 
>
> [image: image.png]
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco WFO QM: "We fixed some bugs...or did we?"

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

That was a good one. Thx.

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Anthony Holloway
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 1:13 PM
To: Cisco VoIP Group 
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco WFO QM: "We fixed some bugs...or did we?"

Just pointing out, what I thought to be a humorous documentation conflict.

Source: QM 11.5(1) Release 
Notes

[image.png]
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip