Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1)
They just are spending the time to go back and test it. Do you really need to re-test MGCP with each new version of CallManager? What changed with the MGCP Draft 0.1 , or are they re-writing MGCP with each new version of Callmanager? From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Hughes, Scott GRE-MG Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 2:02 AM To: Anthony Holloway Cc: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1) I would love for some clarification on this-- specifically VG224, 7925, and 7937 support. On Jul 8, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Anthony Holloway avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.commailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.commailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com%3cmailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com wrote: It appears as though CUCM 10.5 drops official support for some phone and gateway models. E.g., 7925, 7937, 1861 and VG224. Or at least, the compatibility matrix is no longer being maintained for these products. Check here: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/unified/communications/system/versions/IPTMtrix.html#wp1016708 On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:23 AM, GR grc...@gmail.commailto:grc...@gmail.commailto:grc...@gmail.com%3cmailto:grc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, Was just about to do a fresh installation of ucm/cuc/imp on a Cisco BE6k. Is 10.5 mature enough to go ahead? Anyone has anything to share on whether to go for a 10.0 or 10.5? Googling didnot yield sufficient results - if anyone can share there first hand experience or thoughts would be great. -gr Sent from my iPhone ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net%3cmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net%3cmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: The information contained in this message from Great River Energy and any attachments are confidential and intended only for the named recipient(s). If you have received this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information. Please contact the sender immediately by return email and delete the original message. ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip itevomcid ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1)
Ryan, I will send you the details directly if you want, but here's what a Cisco PDI help desk person had to say on the topic: Regarding your query, what the information you provided means is that this models has not been tested on version 10.5 of CUCM so no compatibility is guarantee, this does not means that the phones won’t work but if any issue comes up with interoperability TAC will not support it. On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) rratl...@cisco.com wrote: I'm not sure what's behind them not being on the compatibility matrix, but we've never officially removed support for any device that I can think of. If they aren't on there they just weren't tested. -Ryan On Jul 9, 2014, at 8:22 AM, GR grc...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: Thanks Anthony good point. Anyone from Cisco on the list can clarify this plz? VG224 and 7937 will definitely be a big deal. -gr On 9 Jul 2014, at 4:02 pm, Hughes, Scott GRE-MG shug...@grenergy.com wrote: I would love for some clarification on this-- specifically VG224, 7925, and 7937 support. On Jul 8, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Anthony Holloway avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com javascript:;mailto: avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: It appears as though CUCM 10.5 drops official support for some phone and gateway models. E.g., 7925, 7937, 1861 and VG224. Or at least, the compatibility matrix is no longer being maintained for these products. Check here: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/unified/communications/system/versions/IPTMtrix.html#wp1016708 On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:23 AM, GR grc...@gmail.com javascript:; mailto:grc...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: Hi Guys, Was just about to do a fresh installation of ucm/cuc/imp on a Cisco BE6k. Is 10.5 mature enough to go ahead? Anyone has anything to share on whether to go for a 10.0 or 10.5? Googling didnot yield sufficient results - if anyone can share there first hand experience or thoughts would be great. -gr Sent from my iPhone ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net javascript:;mailto: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net javascript:; https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net javascript:;mailto: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net javascript:; https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: The information contained in this message from Great River Energy and any attachments are confidential and intended only for the named recipient(s). If you have received this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information. Please contact the sender immediately by return email and delete the original message. ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net javascript:; https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1)
Just because the system test folks don't test something doesn't make it not supported. The actual compatibility info I'd say is at http://tools.cisco.com/ITDIT/vtgsca/VTGServlet (linked from software compatibility matrix). At the end of the day unless the UCM version or endpoint has reached end of life (or at least end of sw maintenance) then TAC won't reject your call outright. -Ryan On Jul 9, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Anthony Holloway avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.commailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com wrote: Ryan, I will send you the details directly if you want, but here's what a Cisco PDI help desk person had to say on the topic: Regarding your query, what the information you provided means is that this models has not been tested on version 10.5 of CUCM so no compatibility is guarantee, this does not means that the phones won’t work but if any issue comes up with interoperability TAC will not support it. On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) rratl...@cisco.commailto:rratl...@cisco.com wrote: I'm not sure what's behind them not being on the compatibility matrix, but we've never officially removed support for any device that I can think of. If they aren't on there they just weren't tested. -Ryan On Jul 9, 2014, at 8:22 AM, GR grc...@gmail.comjavascript:; wrote: Thanks Anthony good point. Anyone from Cisco on the list can clarify this plz? VG224 and 7937 will definitely be a big deal. -gr On 9 Jul 2014, at 4:02 pm, Hughes, Scott GRE-MG shug...@grenergy.commailto:shug...@grenergy.com wrote: I would love for some clarification on this-- specifically VG224, 7925, and 7937 support. On Jul 8, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Anthony Holloway avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.comjavascript:;mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.comjavascript:; wrote: It appears as though CUCM 10.5 drops official support for some phone and gateway models. E.g., 7925, 7937, 1861 and VG224. Or at least, the compatibility matrix is no longer being maintained for these products. Check here: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/unified/communications/system/versions/IPTMtrix.html#wp1016708 On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:23 AM, GR grc...@gmail.comjavascript:;mailto:grc...@gmail.comjavascript:; wrote: Hi Guys, Was just about to do a fresh installation of ucm/cuc/imp on a Cisco BE6k. Is 10.5 mature enough to go ahead? Anyone has anything to share on whether to go for a 10.0 or 10.5? Googling didnot yield sufficient results - if anyone can share there first hand experience or thoughts would be great. -gr Sent from my iPhone ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.netjavascript:;mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.netjavascript:; https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.netjavascript:;mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.netjavascript:; https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: The information contained in this message from Great River Energy and any attachments are confidential and intended only for the named recipient(s). If you have received this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information. Please contact the sender immediately by return email and delete the original message. ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.netjavascript:; https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1)
very weird, since they tested a VG248 which is EOL, but not the VG224, which is not EOL. --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 le...@uoguelph.ca www.uoguelph.ca/ccs Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 - Original Message - From: Scott GRE-MG Hughes shug...@grenergy.com To: Anthony Holloway avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com Cc: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Sent: Wednesday, 9 July, 2014 2:02:11 AM Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1) I would love for some clarification on this-- specifically VG224, 7925, and 7937 support. On Jul 8, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Anthony Holloway avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.commailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com wrote: It appears as though CUCM 10.5 drops official support for some phone and gateway models. E.g., 7925, 7937, 1861 and VG224. Or at least, the compatibility matrix is no longer being maintained for these products. Check here: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/unified/communications/system/versions/IPTMtrix.html#wp1016708 On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:23 AM, GR grc...@gmail.commailto:grc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, Was just about to do a fresh installation of ucm/cuc/imp on a Cisco BE6k. Is 10.5 mature enough to go ahead? Anyone has anything to share on whether to go for a 10.0 or 10.5? Googling didnot yield sufficient results - if anyone can share there first hand experience or thoughts would be great. -gr Sent from my iPhone ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: The information contained in this message from Great River Energy and any attachments are confidential and intended only for the named recipient(s). If you have received this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information. Please contact the sender immediately by return email and delete the original message. ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1)
I would love for some clarification on this-- specifically VG224, 7925, and 7937 support. On Jul 8, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Anthony Holloway avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.commailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com wrote: It appears as though CUCM 10.5 drops official support for some phone and gateway models. E.g., 7925, 7937, 1861 and VG224. Or at least, the compatibility matrix is no longer being maintained for these products. Check here: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/unified/communications/system/versions/IPTMtrix.html#wp1016708 On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:23 AM, GR grc...@gmail.commailto:grc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, Was just about to do a fresh installation of ucm/cuc/imp on a Cisco BE6k. Is 10.5 mature enough to go ahead? Anyone has anything to share on whether to go for a 10.0 or 10.5? Googling didnot yield sufficient results - if anyone can share there first hand experience or thoughts would be great. -gr Sent from my iPhone ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: The information contained in this message from Great River Energy and any attachments are confidential and intended only for the named recipient(s). If you have received this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information. Please contact the sender immediately by return email and delete the original message. ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1)
Thanks Anthony good point. Anyone from Cisco on the list can clarify this plz? VG224 and 7937 will definitely be a big deal. -gr On 9 Jul 2014, at 4:02 pm, Hughes, Scott GRE-MG shug...@grenergy.com wrote: I would love for some clarification on this-- specifically VG224, 7925, and 7937 support. On Jul 8, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Anthony Holloway avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.commailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com wrote: It appears as though CUCM 10.5 drops official support for some phone and gateway models. E.g., 7925, 7937, 1861 and VG224. Or at least, the compatibility matrix is no longer being maintained for these products. Check here: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/unified/communications/system/versions/IPTMtrix.html#wp1016708 On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:23 AM, GR grc...@gmail.commailto:grc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, Was just about to do a fresh installation of ucm/cuc/imp on a Cisco BE6k. Is 10.5 mature enough to go ahead? Anyone has anything to share on whether to go for a 10.0 or 10.5? Googling didnot yield sufficient results - if anyone can share there first hand experience or thoughts would be great. -gr Sent from my iPhone ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: The information contained in this message from Great River Energy and any attachments are confidential and intended only for the named recipient(s). If you have received this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information. Please contact the sender immediately by return email and delete the original message. ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1)
10.5 is going to be a long-term release with more updates. 10.0 will probably not be getting any more updates. Most people don't run X.0 software in production unless a certain feature is really, really needed immediately. Think of 10.0 similar to 8.0 and 10.5 similar to 8.5. People are still running 8.5 fine, but no one is still running 8.0 for the most part. On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:23 AM, GR grc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, Was just about to do a fresh installation of ucm/cuc/imp on a Cisco BE6k. Is 10.5 mature enough to go ahead? Anyone has anything to share on whether to go for a 10.0 or 10.5? Googling didnot yield sufficient results - if anyone can share there first hand experience or thoughts would be great. -gr Sent from my iPhone ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1)
I'd go with 10.5. Traditionally once the first non dot zero release is RTM, the dot zero no longer sees development and Cisco generally steers you toward upgrading off the .0. Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 -Original Message- From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of GR Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 8:23 AM To: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Subject: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1) Hi Guys, Was just about to do a fresh installation of ucm/cuc/imp on a Cisco BE6k. Is 10.5 mature enough to go ahead? Anyone has anything to share on whether to go for a 10.0 or 10.5? Googling didnot yield sufficient results - if anyone can share there first hand experience or thoughts would be great. -gr Sent from my iPhone ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1)
I'm trying 10.5 out a few smaller places and having no issues. My setups are usually pretty vanilla, but most things are working ok. Did find a bug with Single Inbox that is fixed in ES4 which won't be available until Friday. CSCuo75357. My single inbox isn't working and the bug is preventing further troubleshooting. Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA 1965 Greenspring Drive Timonium, MD 21093 direct voice. 443.541.1518 fax. 410.252.9284 Twitter | Facebook | Website | Email Support Support Phone. 410.252.8830 -Original Message- From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Heim, Dennis Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 10:21 AM To: GR; cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Subject: [QUARANTINE] Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1) Importance: Low I'd go with 10.5. Traditionally once the first non dot zero release is RTM, the dot zero no longer sees development and Cisco generally steers you toward upgrading off the .0. Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 -Original Message- From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of GR Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 8:23 AM To: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Subject: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1) Hi Guys, Was just about to do a fresh installation of ucm/cuc/imp on a Cisco BE6k. Is 10.5 mature enough to go ahead? Anyone has anything to share on whether to go for a 10.0 or 10.5? Googling didnot yield sufficient results - if anyone can share there first hand experience or thoughts would be great. -gr Sent from my iPhone ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1)
I haven't run into any problems with 10.5(1) on CUCM yet. But... if you want to use SRST Manager it is only compatable with 9.x until later this summer when they release the new version. -- Ben Story CCSP, CCNA, CCNA Wireless, CCDA ben.st...@gmail.com @ntwrk80 http://showbrain.blogspot.com http://rand0mw0rds.blogspot.com From sour-faced saints and silly devotions, good Lord, preserve us!. -- St. Teresa of Avila On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:23 AM, GR grc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, Was just about to do a fresh installation of ucm/cuc/imp on a Cisco BE6k. Is 10.5 mature enough to go ahead? Anyone has anything to share on whether to go for a 10.0 or 10.5? Googling didnot yield sufficient results - if anyone can share there first hand experience or thoughts would be great. -gr Sent from my iPhone ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1)
Thank you all - will go with 10.5. Sent from my iPhone On 9 Jul 2014, at 1:57 am, Matthew Loraditch mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com wrote: I'm trying 10.5 out a few smaller places and having no issues. My setups are usually pretty vanilla, but most things are working ok. Did find a bug with Single Inbox that is fixed in ES4 which won't be available until Friday. CSCuo75357. My single inbox isn't working and the bug is preventing further troubleshooting. Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA 1965 Greenspring Drive Timonium, MD 21093 direct voice. 443.541.1518 fax. 410.252.9284 Twitter | Facebook | Website | Email Support Support Phone. 410.252.8830 -Original Message- From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Heim, Dennis Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 10:21 AM To: GR; cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Subject: [QUARANTINE] Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1) Importance: Low I'd go with 10.5. Traditionally once the first non dot zero release is RTM, the dot zero no longer sees development and Cisco generally steers you toward upgrading off the .0. Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 -Original Message- From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of GR Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 8:23 AM To: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Subject: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1) Hi Guys, Was just about to do a fresh installation of ucm/cuc/imp on a Cisco BE6k. Is 10.5 mature enough to go ahead? Anyone has anything to share on whether to go for a 10.0 or 10.5? Googling didnot yield sufficient results - if anyone can share there first hand experience or thoughts would be great. -gr Sent from my iPhone ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
