Markus Kolb wrote:
> Am 08.09.2019 19:28, schrieb Per Jessen:
>
>> This was discussed quite intensively on the openSUSE list just
>> recently:
>>
>> Create /etc/systemd/system/clamd.service.d/memlimit.conf and add:
>>
>> MemoryLimit=500M (for instance)
>> TimeoutSec=300s
>
> I've also
Hello again,
On Mon, 9 Sep 2019, Markus Kolb wrote:
Am 08.09.2019 18:35, schrieb G.W. Haywood:
> Perhaps you haven't been reading recent posts on the users' list.
Which thread topic do you mean? The "How to boost clamav? Reloading
database results in a talking timeout?"?
Yes.
Another
Am 08.09.2019 19:28, schrieb Per Jessen:
This was discussed quite intensively on the openSUSE list just
recently:
Create /etc/systemd/system/clamd.service.d/memlimit.conf and add:
MemoryLimit=500M (for instance)
TimeoutSec=300s
I've also cheered too soon.
This doesn't always work as
Markus Kolb wrote:
> Am 08.09.2019 19:28, schrieb Per Jessen:
>> Markus Kolb wrote:
>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> I'd like to get some thoughts of reducing the memory footprint of
>>> clamav (clamd)...
>>
> [...]
>> MemoryLimit=500M (for instance)
>> This reduces the working set according to your
Am 08.09.2019 18:35, schrieb G.W. Haywood:
Perhaps you haven't been reading recent posts on the users' list.
Which thread topic do you mean?
The "How to boost clamav? Reloading database results in a talking
timeout?"?
___
clamav-devel mailing
Hi there,
On Sun, 8 Sep 2019, Markus Kolb wrote:
I'd like to get some thoughts of reducing the memory footprint of clamav
(clamd)...
My thought: Once upon a time they used to say that hardware accounted
for 90% of the cost of a computer system; then they used to say it was
more like 50/50;
Hey,
I'd like to get some thoughts of reducing the memory footprint of clamav
(clamd)...
Do you have already some ideas of the way to introduce a feature like
this?
Is my assumption correct that the loaded signature database in memory is
the biggest part?
So my idea would be to do
