from:"BSCH"

Re: [Clamav-devel] API Clam AV under Windows

2006-04-27 Thread BSCH

Mybe you could see the whole of the Clamav document at first
The usage of the Clamav interface could be introduce by it




BSCH
2006-04-27



发件人： Zorron Konto
发送时间： 2006-04-26 16:30:46
收件人： clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net
抄送： 
主题： [Clamav-devel] API Clam AV under Windows

Hi,
I'm  working  on  a  project  of  email  filtering  on  exchange  server  2003  
under  
Windows  Server  2003,  I'm  searching  for  an  API  of  any  Antivirus  that  
I  can  
call  through  my  interface.  If  found  me,  can  u  tell  me  how  to  use  
it?  how  to  
call  it,  through  which  methods?  I'm  new  to  the  usage  of  APIs...
thanks  in  advance,

xinea

_
FREE  pop-up  blocking  with  the  new  MSN  Toolbar  -  get  it  now!  
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/

___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html

Re: Re: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code

2006-04-01 Thread BSCH

GiM,您好！

I think you not to understand my mean.
your said "Programming in these environments is totaly different, and
creating one universal engine wouldn't be reasonable." YOU COULD NOT PROOF 
IT.
The engine is pure! It only match signature one a file! match signature could 
use standar c or c++.

=== 2006-04-01 23:10:09 您在来信中写道：===

>BSCH in message 'Re: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code' wrote:
>> Brian A. Reiter!
>> 
>>   if engine design pure. the others could use the clamav engine to write
>> anti-virus software. the software not to write by us. ALL could use the
>> engine convenience.
>> 
>>  
>
>I don't think you understand the differences between UNIX and Windows
>platforms. Programming in these environments is totaly different, and
>creating one universal engine wouldn't be reasonable.
>
>And what problems do you see for others writing anti-virus software
>on ClamAV basis?
>
>btw: 1) I'm not a native english speaker, but it's quite hard o understand
> what you're trying to say (this and previous posts)
> 2) stop top-posting, this is really annoying.
>
> main(int a[puts("Michał 'GiM' Spadliński")]){}
>-- 
>144722  I've found bug in sendmail
>144724  what a suprise
>
>___
>http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


致
礼！
 
 
BSCH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
　　2006-04-02

___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html

Re: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code

2006-04-01 Thread BSCH

Brian A. Reiter!

  if engine design pure. the others could use the clamav engine to write 
anti-virus software. the software not to write by us. ALL could use the engine 
convenience.



=== 2006-04-01 08:07:53 您在来信中写道：===

>X-Gmail-Received: 7fb57286f11b0f23703c9d0c4a2d27a4c38d3b00
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Received: by 10.36.39.5 with SMTP id m5cs36786nzm;
>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:07:53 -0800 (PST)
>Received: by 10.54.93.12 with SMTP id q12mr640685wrb;
>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:07:53 -0800 (PST)
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Received: from aj.catt.com (aj.catt.com [64.18.103.6])
>by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 29si482937wrl.2006.03.31.16.07.49;
>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:07:53 -0800 (PST)
>Received-SPF: pass (gmail.com: domain of [EMAIL PROTECTED] designates 
>64.18.103.6 as permitted sender)
>Received: from aj.catt.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>   by aj.catt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B82E156002;
>   Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:07:47 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from rs19.luxsci.com (rs19.luxsci.com [65.61.136.23])
>   by aj.catt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D6F10DA44
>   for ;
>   Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:07:44 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from prometheus (pool-72-75-60-71.washdc.east.verizon.net
>   [72.75.60.71]) (authenticated bits=0)
>   by rs19.luxsci.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3107eZi018708
>   (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT)
>   for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:07:41 -0600
>From: "Brian A. Reiter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'ClamAV Development'" 
>Subject: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code
>Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:07:32 -0500
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
>Thread-Index: AcZVFl8cPxgzSxkuRISADJDEue5QoQACR8zQ
>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830
>X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
>X-BeenThere: clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
>Precedence: list
>Reply-To: ClamAV Development 
>List-Id: ClamAV Development 
>List-Unsubscribe: 
><http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-devel>,
>   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>List-Post: <mailto:clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net>
>List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>List-Subscribe: 
><http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-devel>,
>   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===2051393441=="
>Mime-version: 1.0
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>--===2051393441==
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature";
>   micalg=SHA1; boundary="=_NextPart_000_00C0_01C654F6.5CD55290"
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>--=_NextPart_000_00C0_01C654F6.5CD55290
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>   charset="us-ascii"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>
>> > i know it maybe use some time to write it, but i think it 
>> valuealbe. 
>> > ONE ENGINE IS A CORE OF SOFTWARE. and why don't you design 
>> it indepent 
>> > platform? if possible, the directory maybe plot clearly, the same
>> 
>> The engine is POSIX compliant.
>
>And, in fact, Microsoft has made a POSIX-compliant executive sub-system
>derived from OpenBSD and System V available for Windows NT 5+. It is called
>Interix aka "Services for UNIX" and "Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications
>(SUA)". Clamd and clamscan run fine under Interix.
>
>Download SFU 3.5 here:
>http://www.microsoft.com/technet/interopmigration/unix/sfu/default.mspx
>
>Subsystem for Unix-based Applications (SUA/Interix 5.2):
>http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/r2/unixinterop/default.mspx
>
>POSIX should be portable enough.
>
>--=_NextPart_000_00C0_01C654F6.5CD55290--
>
>
>--===2051393441==
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>___
>http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
>
>--===2051393441==--
>

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


致
礼！
 
 
BSCH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
　　2006-04-01

___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html

Re: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code

2006-04-01 Thread BSCH

Brian A. Reiter
  If you could compile clamav at Win32, it maybe have little fix to src. So 
now, it has a module Clamav-win32. My mean, it has not must. You could 
maintenance ONE src. Not to have the module of Clamav-win32. If want to use in 
Win32. Only compile it. Now we have use in win32, we must patch the src, and 
compile. Though, we could compile it in Cygwin, but the execustive must have 
DLL with Cygwin.



=== 2006-04-01 08:07:53 您在来信中写道：===

>X-Gmail-Received: 7fb57286f11b0f23703c9d0c4a2d27a4c38d3b00
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Received: by 10.36.39.5 with SMTP id m5cs36786nzm;
>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:07:53 -0800 (PST)
>Received: by 10.54.93.12 with SMTP id q12mr640685wrb;
>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:07:53 -0800 (PST)
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Received: from aj.catt.com (aj.catt.com [64.18.103.6])
>by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 29si482937wrl.2006.03.31.16.07.49;
>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:07:53 -0800 (PST)
>Received-SPF: pass (gmail.com: domain of [EMAIL PROTECTED] designates 
>64.18.103.6 as permitted sender)
>Received: from aj.catt.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>   by aj.catt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B82E156002;
>   Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:07:47 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from rs19.luxsci.com (rs19.luxsci.com [65.61.136.23])
>   by aj.catt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D6F10DA44
>   for ;
>   Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:07:44 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from prometheus (pool-72-75-60-71.washdc.east.verizon.net
>   [72.75.60.71]) (authenticated bits=0)
>   by rs19.luxsci.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3107eZi018708
>   (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT)
>   for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:07:41 -0600
>From: "Brian A. Reiter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'ClamAV Development'" 
>Subject: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code
>Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:07:32 -0500
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
>Thread-Index: AcZVFl8cPxgzSxkuRISADJDEue5QoQACR8zQ
>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830
>X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
>X-BeenThere: clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
>Precedence: list
>Reply-To: ClamAV Development 
>List-Id: ClamAV Development 
>List-Unsubscribe: 
><http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-devel>,
>   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>List-Post: <mailto:clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net>
>List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>List-Subscribe: 
><http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-devel>,
>   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===2051393441=="
>Mime-version: 1.0
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>--===2051393441==
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature";
>   micalg=SHA1; boundary="=_NextPart_000_00C0_01C654F6.5CD55290"
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>--=_NextPart_000_00C0_01C654F6.5CD55290
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>   charset="us-ascii"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>
>> > i know it maybe use some time to write it, but i think it 
>> valuealbe. 
>> > ONE ENGINE IS A CORE OF SOFTWARE. and why don't you design 
>> it indepent 
>> > platform? if possible, the directory maybe plot clearly, the same
>> 
>> The engine is POSIX compliant.
>
>And, in fact, Microsoft has made a POSIX-compliant executive sub-system
>derived from OpenBSD and System V available for Windows NT 5+. It is called
>Interix aka "Services for UNIX" and "Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications
>(SUA)". Clamd and clamscan run fine under Interix.
>
>Download SFU 3.5 here:
>http://www.microsoft.com/technet/interopmigration/unix/sfu/default.mspx
>
>Subsystem for Unix-based Applications (SUA/Interix 5.2):
>http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/r2/unixinterop/default.mspx
>
>POSIX should be portable enough.
>
>--=_NextPart_000_00C0_01C654F6.5CD55290--
>
>
>--===2051393441==
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>___
>http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
>
>--===2051393441==--
>

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


致
礼！
 
 
BSCH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
　　2006-04-01

___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html

Re: [Clamav-devel] API Clam AV under Windows

Re: Re: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code

Re: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code

Re: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code

4 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information