> GiM,您好！
>
> your said "Programming in these environments is totaly different, and
> creating one universal engine wouldn't be reasonable." YOU COULD
> NOT PROOF IT.
> The engine is pure! It only match signature one a file! match
> signature could use standar c or c++.
I strongly suggest t
ture could
use standar c or c++.
=== 2006-04-01 23:10:09 您在来信中写道：===
>BSCH in message 'Re: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code' wrote:
>> Brian A. Reiter!
>>
>> if engine design pure. the others could use the clamav engine to write
>> anti-v
BSCH in message 'Re: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code' wrote:
> Brian A. Reiter!
>
> if engine design pure. the others could use the clamav engine to write
> anti-virus software. the software not to write by us. ALL could use the
> engine convenience.
D5 bits=128 verify=NOT)
> for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:07:41 -0600
>From: "Brian A. Reiter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'ClamAV Development'"
>Subject: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code
>Date: Fri,
1 -0600
>From: "Brian A. Reiter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'ClamAV Development'"
>Subject: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code
>Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:07:32 -0500
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X
> > i know it maybe use some time to write it, but i think it
> valuealbe.
> > ONE ENGINE IS A CORE OF SOFTWARE. and why don't you design
> it indepent
> > platform? if possible, the directory maybe plot clearly, the same
>
> The engine is POSIX compliant.
And, in fact, Microsoft has made a
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 06:21:53 +0800
"梁飞" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tomasz Kojm,您好！
>
> but in fact, engine is pure. Most of commercial AV has Linux and
> Win32 version. so... the engine could be design the independ OS, why don't
> you code that?
http://www.clamav.net/abstract.html#pagesta
Tomasz Kojm,您好！
but in fact, engine is pure. Most of commercial AV has Linux and Win32
version. so...
the engine could be design the independ OS, why don't you code that?
i know it maybe use some time to write it, but i think it valuealbe. ONE
ENGINE IS A CORE OF SOFTWARE. and why do
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 05:19:35 +0800
"梁飞" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> clamav-devel，您好！
>
> why don't you write portable code?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POSIX
> if some function must use dependent platform API, we could implement it
> using macro at runtime. e.g, visit a directory are differen
clamav-devel，您好！
why don't you write portable code?
if some function must use dependent platform API, we could implement it using
macro at runtime.
e.g, visit a directory are difference in Linux and Win32. We could implement a
VisitDirectory fuction
in LibClamav, and use it. The implement of Vi
10 matches
Mail list logo
