Re: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code

2006-04-01 Thread BSCH
ould be portable enough. > >--=_NextPart_000_00C0_01C654F6.5CD55290-- > > >--===2051393441== >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >Content-Disposition: inline > >___ >http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html > >--===2051393441==-- > = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 致 礼! BSCH [EMAIL PROTECTED]   2006-04-01 ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html

Re: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code

2006-04-01 Thread BSCH
p://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/r2/unixinterop/default.mspx > >POSIX should be portable enough. > >--=_NextPart_000_00C0_01C654F6.5CD55290-- > > >--===2051393441== >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >Content-Disposition: inline > >___ >http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html > >--===2051393441==-- > = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 致 礼! BSCH [EMAIL PROTECTED]   2006-04-01 ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html

Re: Re: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code

2006-04-01 Thread BSCH
ture could use standar c or c++. === 2006-04-01 23:10:09 您在来信中写道:=== >BSCH in message 'Re: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code' wrote: >> Brian A. Reiter! >> >> if engine design pure. the others could use the clamav engine to write >> anti-v

Re: [Clamav-devel] API Clam AV under Windows

2006-04-27 Thread BSCH
Mybe you could see the whole of the Clamav document at first The usage of the Clamav interface could be introduce by it BSCH 2006-04-27 发件人: Zorron Konto 发送时间: 2006-04-26 16:30:46 收件人: clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net 抄送: 主题: [Clamav-devel] API Clam AV under Windows Hi, I'm working