Hi Tod
New version of the Clamav / Clamav-milter Logwatch scripts awailable. You
may
download from here:
http://www.schimkat.dk/clamav/clamav-logwatch-0.30.tar.gz
I'm going to assume that these scripts are not intended to be run from
the commandline. I had to hack at it a bit before I
Hello, clamav-users,
I can not find any reference how to get count of known viruses with
any executable of clamav distribution.
Seems it must be a freshclam or clam(d)scan functions to show it?
_
Marin Alex
---
This
Marin Alexey wrote the following on 05/07/2004 11:32 AM :
Hello, clamav-users,
I can not find any reference how to get count of known viruses with
any executable of clamav distribution.
sigtool -l | wc -l
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored
Marin Alexey wrote:
I can not find any reference how to get count of known viruses with
any executable of clamav distribution.
You can use sigtool -l | wc -l from a command shell.
--
Mit freundlichen Gren / Yours sincerely
Dipl. Inform. Ralph Seichter
HORUS-IT
Ahornweg 10
D-57635 Oberirsen
Tel
What is the simplest and best solution for providing virus detection of
incoming email using Clamav with sendmail both assuming I don't have
milter
and that I do?
RedHat and Fedora have a sendmail-devel package that includes the milter
support (provided Sendmail is new enough). It installs
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Antony Stone wrote:
On Friday 07 May 2004 12:49 pm, Dan O'Brien wrote:
What is the simplest and best solution for providing virus detection of
incoming email using Clamav with sendmail both assuming I don't have
milter and that I do?
I like
On Friday 07 May 2004 2:14 pm, Mike Lambert wrote:
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Antony Stone wrote:
On Friday 07 May 2004 12:49 pm, Dan O'Brien wrote:
What is the simplest and best solution for providing virus detection
of incoming email using Clamav with sendmail both assuming I don't
have
I've read herein that it's recommended that you uninstall ClamAV 0.68 before
you install 0.70.
I apologize if this is a stupid question, but how do you uninstall 0.68? I
think I've read all of the documentation that comes with the source and the
clamdoc.pdf, but I don't see anything on
What is the simplest and best solution for providing virus detection of
incoming email using Clamav with sendmail both assuming I don't have
milter and that I do?
Clamav does it all itself no need for another solution, look in
.../clamav-milter/INSTALL.
-Nigel
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger,
On Fri, 7 May 2004 09:56:38 -0400, Ken Morley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've read herein that it's recommended that you uninstall ClamAV 0.68 before
you install 0.70.
I apologize if this is a stupid question, but how do you uninstall 0.68? I
think I've read all of the documentation that comes
Antony Stone wanted us to know:
accepting every single message, MailScanner would be fine. If, like me,
you prefer to 5xx reject messages that you don't like (virus, spam,
But, what is the advantage of this? It does not reduce your bandwidth by
No it does not reduce the bandwidth, however
Ken Morley mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've read herein that it's recommended that you uninstall ClamAV 0.68
before you install 0.70.
I apologize if this is a stupid question, but how do you uninstall
0.68? I think I've read all of the documentation that comes with the
source and the
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Antony Stone wrote:
On Friday 07 May 2004 2:14 pm, Mike Lambert wrote:
If I understand MailScanner correctly, the mta must accept the message
before passing to MailScanner for processing.
That is true.
If you don't mind
accepting every single message, MailScanner
I've just installed RedHat Enterprise ES V3 and patched to the latest
revision. I then installed ClamAV 0.70, ran freshclam and did a clamdscan
against the entire drive.
I was surprised when clamdscan reported:
//proc/kcore: Trojan.MiniCommander.dr FOUND
What's the possibility that the server
At 12:27 PM 5/7/04, Mike Lambert wrote:
But, what is the advantage of this? It does not reduce your bandwidth by
avoiding transfer of unwanted emails, since your milter has to see
enough of
the content to decide not to accept it.
The advantage is sending a 5xx reject instead of a 2xx
On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 18:36, Ken Morley wrote:
I was surprised when clamdscan reported:
//proc/kcore: Trojan.MiniCommander.dr FOUND
What's the possibility that the server is really infected?
It got to be somewhat unlikely that a running linux kernel would get
infected with a Windows
On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 18:27, Mike Lambert wrote:
Again, the advantage is sending 5xx instead of 2xx. IMO, giving the
connecting mta a status code appropriate to the message disposition is
better than simply accepting _all_ messages only to drop some later (I
do not consider generating a
On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 13:36 -0400, Ken Morley wrote:
I've just installed RedHat Enterprise ES V3 and patched to the latest
revision. I then installed ClamAV 0.70, ran freshclam and did a clamdscan
against the entire drive.
I was surprised when clamdscan reported:
//proc/kcore:
Hi,
I am attempting to replace our e-mail virus scanner (RAV) with clamav.
I am running it under OS X 10.3. I have about 250 e-mail messages that
RAV has quarantined as being virus infected. If I use clamscan to scan
these files, it only finds a few files that are infected (with
I.Frame). If
On OS X 10.2.2, trying to run Freshclam after a successful install of
ClamAV...test runs fine too. But running the freshclam updater results in:
/usr/local/bin/freshclam
dyld: /usr/local/bin/freshclam can't open library:
/usr/local/lib/libclamav.1.dylib (No such file or directory, errno = 2)
On Friday 07 May 2004 8:52 pm, Phil Ershler wrote:
Hi,
I am attempting to replace our e-mail virus scanner (RAV) with clamav.
I am running it under OS X 10.3. I have about 250 e-mail messages that
RAV has quarantined as being virus infected. If I use clamscan to scan
these files, it
-- On Friday, May 7, 2004 4:07 PM -0400 Rob Kudyba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On OS X 10.2.2, trying to run Freshclam after a successful install of ClamAV...test
runs fine too. But running the freshclam updater results in:
/usr/local/bin/freshclam
dyld: /usr/local/bin/freshclam can't open
On Fri, 7 May 2004 13:36:09 -0400
Ken Morley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just installed RedHat Enterprise ES V3 and patched to the latest
revision. I then installed ClamAV 0.70, ran freshclam and did a
clamdscan against the entire drive.
I was surprised when clamdscan reported:
On Fri, 7 May 2004 13:52:45 -0600
Phil Ershler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am attempting to replace our e-mail virus scanner (RAV) with
clamav.
I am running it under OS X 10.3. I have about 250 e-mail messages that
RAV has quarantined as being virus infected. If I use
Hi
I upgrade from clamav-devel-20040418 to clamav-devel-20040507 and
notifies from clam to postmaster to inform a virus was found, are queued.
After one hour the messages are sent to posmaster (Every hour the queue
is procesed)
Virus are filtered OK.
Clamav-devel-20040418 works fine.
I have
Thanks for the reply, but
clamscan --mbox quarantine (where quarantine is the directory where
RAV has stored the infected messages
produces the same output as
clamscan quarantine
Am I still being stupid about something?
Thanks, Phil
On Friday, May 7, 2004, at 03:24 PM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Ing. Germán González B. wanted us to know:
CLAMAV_FLAGS=--quarantine-dir=/var/clamav/quarantine --max-children=200
Holy cow! 200 ??? Is there a reason that you have it set that high?
--
Regards... Todd
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety
On Saturday 08 May 2004 12:09 am, Todd Lyons wrote:
Ing. Germán González B. wanted us to know:
After one hour the messages are sent to posmaster (Every hour the queue
is procesed)
CLAMAV_FLAGS=--quarantine-dir=/var/clamav/quarantine --max-children=200
Holy cow! 200 ??? Is there a
Hi,
I've been having problems updating the daily.cvd file
I've just narrowed the problem down to the transparent proxy and content
filter that I run on my network.
As yet I haven't been able to hone it on it any further, so has anyone
else had this problem with transparent proxy and/or content
Ing. Germán González B. wanted us to know:
CLAMAV_FLAGS=--quarantine-dir=/var/clamav/quarantine --max-children=200
Holy cow! 200 ??? Is there a reason that you have it set that high?
Well. Two months ago the server reach 150 childrens. I have to apply en
filter to port 25 from a lot of
On Sat, 8 May 2004, Antony Stone wrote:
On Saturday 08 May 2004 12:09 am, Todd Lyons wrote:
Ing. Germán González B. wanted us to know:
After one hour the messages are sent to posmaster (Every hour the queue
is procesed)
CLAMAV_FLAGS=--quarantine-dir=/var/clamav/quarantine
31 matches
Mail list logo