Hi list
Just to let you know that the US mirrors seem to be down.
The following mirror is stil working fine.
http://ovh.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/clamav/clamav-0.80.tar.gz
http://ovh.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/clamav/clamav-0.80.tar.gz
Regards,
Tom Kinghorn
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:42:48 +1000, Bill Maidment [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of my servers is giving these warnings. What causes this and is it
anything to worry about?
I've been seeing the same error from time to time, so you're not alone :)
--
Please keep list traffic on
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Is that a problem??? or what?
The problem is you haven't even read my yesterday's e-mails in this
case.
Sorry about that , BUT scanning the tons of emails i get from this
mailing list and others (mimedefang thinstation) is sometimes too hard
work sometimes too boring.
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:34:48 +0200, Meni Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry about that , BUT scanning the tons of emails i get from this
mailing list and others (mimedefang thinstation) is sometimes too hard
work sometimes too boring.
If you're not going to even try to read the replies,
Rob MacGregor wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:34:48 +0200, Meni Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry about that , BUT scanning the tons of emails i get from this
mailing list and others (mimedefang thinstation) is sometimes too hard
work sometimes too boring.
If you're not going to even try to
Hi
I'v got next errors and warnings whe try configure clamav 0.80:
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: resolv.h:
On Oct 19, 2004, at 03:10, Korchmenuk Nickolay wrote:
Hi
I'v got next errors and warnings whe try configure clamav 0.80:
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: check for missing prerequisite
headers?
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: see the
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 03:16:53 -0400
Dale Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OS: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p1
--
Korchmenuk Nickolay
19 Oct 2004 10:23:50
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
when i enter 'clamd -V' i get a version line reflecting the i get a
version line indicating the current database version, eg .../535/...,
currently.
the clamav-milter X-Virus-Scanned lines, however, seem to reflect the
version feedback of clamd when the milter was started, not the current
So I made the leap from 0.75.1 to 0.80 and get the following error in exim
log
2004-10-19 09:20:52 1CJoIe-0002Ut-E3 malware acl condition: clamd: unable to
read from socket (No such file or directory)
2004-10-19 09:20:52 1CJoIe-0002Ut-E3 H=floyd.blarg.net (mail.blarg.net)
[206.124.128.8]:56990
Hello together
Iam a new ClamAV user. I have installed it a few days ago on my win2k
windows PC.
I have an scheudled update every hour. but now i always got this warnings
here:
---
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update immediately !
WARNING: Current functionality level =
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:42:23 +0200 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Graham Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm still searching the archives, but if anyone can point me in the
right direction it would help
Have a look at the thread about Exim entitled Upgrading to 0.80rc3
breaks Exim malware acl.
The
Graham Dodd wrote:
So I made the leap from 0.75.1 to 0.80 and get the following error in exim
log
2004-10-19 09:20:52 1CJoIe-0002Ut-E3 malware acl condition: clamd: unable to
read from socket (No such file or directory)
2004-10-19 09:20:52 1CJoIe-0002Ut-E3 H=floyd.blarg.net (mail.blarg.net)
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:00:41 +0200 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Hübler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I couldnt find something about it on the net. So i ask you: What is
this? Are my hourly updates not enough? How can i solve this problem?
I have the Clamwin 0.35.2 running. IT IS the latest
Michael Hübler wrote:
I have an scheudled update every hour. but now i always got this warnings
here:
---
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update immediately !
WARNING: Current functionality level = 2, required = 3
---
I couldnt find something about it on the net. So i ask
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:03:13 +0700 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fajar A. Nugraha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
exim 4.24 (the exiscan patch of it, to be exact) seems to have that
problem. Use exim 4.41 instead.
Or even 4.43 with exiscan-acl-28.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
-- So I made the leap from 0.75.1 to 0.80 and get the following
-- error in exim
-- log
--
-- 2004-10-19 09:20:52 1CJoIe-0002Ut-E3 malware acl condition:
-- clamd: unable to
-- read from socket (No such file or directory)
-- 2004-10-19 09:20:52 1CJoIe-0002Ut-E3 H=floyd.blarg.net
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:03:13 +0700 Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
[ ... ]
exim 4.24 (the exiscan patch of it, to be exact) seems to have that
problem. Use exim 4.41 instead.
Or use the newest exim-4.43/exiscan-acl-4.43-28 combination.
Works great with ClamAV 0.80.
--Frank Elsner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:03:13 +0700 Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
[ ... ]
exim 4.24 (the exiscan patch of it, to be exact) seems to have that
problem. Use exim 4.41 instead.
Or use the newest exim-4.43/exiscan-acl-4.43-28 combination. Works
great with ClamAV 0.80.
Quoting Michael Hübler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I couldnt find something about it on the net. So i ask you: What is this?
Are my hourly updates not enough? How can i solve this problem?
I have the Clamwin 0.35.2 running. IT IS the latest release. What is
Outdated then?
As people have already
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:23:04 +0200 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Graham Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:03:13 +0700 Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
[ ... ]
exim 4.24 (the exiscan patch of it, to be exact) seems to have that
problem. Use exim 4.41
Hello list,
I have upgraded from clamav 075.1 to clamav-80 using the rpm for FC2.
after the upgrade, qmail-scanner ( 1.23 ) is not detecting clamav.
I have recompiles qmail-scanner, ran qmail-scanner.pl -z and
qmail-scanner.pl -g , with the same result.
Any clue??
Best Regards,
Kareem Mahgoub
Hi,
First let me apologize if this is way off the mark, but it has aroused
my curiosity. When you say freshclam fails, do you get a return
value of 1? I only ask because we have two Web Proxies in the office,
one is a Novell box and the other is Squid/Debian. I built the
Squid/Debian box as
PERFECT!
--
Message: 12
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:23:37 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED ?
To: ClamAV users ML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;
All,
I stuck to use clamd of version 0.80 with daemontools (I used this scheme
very nicely for older version). Does anyone know how to do it?
Thx Rgds,
Awie
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:24:07 +0300, Korchmenuk Nickolay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 03:16:53 -0400
Dale Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OS: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p1
Update your ports and install from there.
--
Please keep list traffic on the list.
Rob
* Kareem Mahgoub [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-10-19 10:32]:
Hello list,
I have upgraded from clamav 075.1 to clamav-80 using the rpm for FC2.
after the upgrade, qmail-scanner ( 1.23 ) is not detecting clamav.
I have recompiles qmail-scanner, ran qmail-scanner.pl -z and
qmail-scanner.pl -g , with
On 10/19/2004 10:32 AM +0200, Kareem Mahgoub wrote:
Hello list,
I have upgraded from clamav 075.1 to clamav-80 using the rpm for FC2.
after the upgrade, qmail-scanner ( 1.23 ) is not detecting clamav.
I have recompiles qmail-scanner, ran qmail-scanner.pl -z and
qmail-scanner.pl -g , with the same
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:42:23 +0200
Graham Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I made the leap from 0.75.1 to 0.80 and get the following error in
exim log
2004-10-19 09:20:52 1CJoIe-0002Ut-E3 malware acl condition: clamd:
unable to read from socket (No such file or directory)
It's trying to
Thanks for the quick help.
I thought it is something in clamav not QS ( on a second thought, it should
really go to QS mailing list ) my apology.
For hitting reply on a previous thread,
I thought it won't harm anybody, but it seems to be something bad. It will
be my last time.
Best Regards,
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:39:44 +0200
Kareem Mahgoub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the quick help.
I thought it is something in clamav not QS ( on a second thought, it
should really go to QS mailing list ) my apology.
For hitting reply on a previous thread,
I thought it won't harm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:42:23 +0200
Graham Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I made the leap from 0.75.1 to 0.80 and get the following error
in exim log
2004-10-19 09:20:52 1CJoIe-0002Ut-E3 malware acl condition: clamd:
unable to read from socket (No such file or
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:00:03 +0200
Graham Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:42:23 +0200
Graham Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I made the leap from 0.75.1 to 0.80 and get the following error
in exim log
2004-10-19 09:20:52
On 10/19/2004 10:54 AM +0200, Awie wrote:
All,
I stuck to use clamd of version 0.80 with daemontools (I used this scheme
very nicely for older version). Does anyone know how to do it?
Thx Rgds,
Awie
I use daemontools to run clamd.
I didn't change a thing when upgrading from 0.75.1
to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:00:03 +0200
Graham Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:42:23 +0200
Graham Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I made the leap from 0.75.1 to 0.80 and get the following error
in exim log
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:23:21 +0200
Graham Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Until 0.80 this worked
Oh, I remember that issue. But this is due to an improvement in ClamAV
and not a bug!
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(\/)\.
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:23:21 +0200 Graham Dodd wrote:
[ ... ]
av_scanner = clamd:127.0.0.1 3310
That means your clamd listems for TCP connections on port 3310
And in check_data have the following:
# Check for Virus/virii exiscan
deny message = This message contains malware
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:42:48 +1000
Bill Maidment [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of my servers is giving these warnings. What causes this and is it
anything to worry about?
freshclam daemon 0.80 (OS: linux-gnu, ARCH: i386, CPU: i686)
ClamAV update process started at Tue Oct 19 14:39:06
I use daemontools to run clamd.
I didn't change a thing when upgrading from 0.75.1
to 0.80rc-series, and 0.80 final.
My run script and clamd.conf attached.
Regards,
Niek
--
Hello Niek,
I used your script and clamd.conf. The readproctitle said error in
Library..bla.. bla...
Then I
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:54:14 +0200
Graham Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well some people would say bug . :-)
What happened to backward compatibility ?
What do you call a backward incompatibility? The bug in exiscan? ;-)
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:23:21 +0200 Graham Dodd wrote:
[ ... ]
av_scanner = clamd:127.0.0.1 3310
That means your clamd listems for TCP connections on port 3310
And in check_data have the following:
# Check for Virus/virii exiscan
deny message = This
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:54:14 +0200
Graham Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well some people would say bug . :-)
What happened to backward compatibility ?
What do you call a backward incompatibility? The bug in exiscan? ;-)
I wonder what Tom would say :-)
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:01:13 +0200
Graham Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, and now that I've switched back to 0.75.1 it's running fine.
I have no way to upgrade Exim from 4.24 to 4.43 as I inherited the
system and it has custom patches to work with LDAP.
Sounds like a laziness. Remember
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:06:44 +0200
Graham Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's see.
Exim 4.24 exiscan-acl patch rev. 12 ClamAV 0.75.1 - works
Exim 4.24 exiscan-acl patch rev. 12 ClamAV 0.80 - doesn't work
What changed ?
Session handling has been improved in ClamAV and the old
Graham Dodd wrote:
I have no way to upgrade Exim from 4.24 to 4.43 as I inherited the system
and it has custom patches to work with LDAP.
Won't standard exim work with LDAP, assuming you set correct parameter
during compile?
I compiled one successfully, but I never did use the LDAP lookups for
Trying to upgrade to .80 on SuSE Linux PPC distro, from 0.75.
It looks like /etc/clamav.conf in the .75 release, has been replaced by
/etc/clamd.conf in the 80 release. Can anyone confirm, because this will
effect my upgrade procedures.
Alex Laslavic
Havertys Tech Services
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:12:31 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to upgrade to .80 on SuSE Linux PPC distro, from 0.75.
It looks like /etc/clamav.conf in the .75 release, has been replaced
by/etc/clamd.conf in the 80 release. Can anyone confirm,
Confirmed. But next time please
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:12:31 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to upgrade to .80 on SuSE Linux PPC distro, from 0.75.
It looks like /etc/clamav.conf in the .75 release, has been replaced by
/etc/clamd.conf in the 80 release. Can anyone confirm, because this will
effect my upgrade
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graham Dodd wrote:
I have no way to upgrade Exim from 4.24 to 4.43 as I inherited the
system and it has custom patches to work with LDAP.
Won't standard exim work with LDAP, assuming you set correct
If only I had a standard Exim, or the source and patches.
Hi
I'v got next errors and warnings whe try configure clamav 0.80:
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING:
Dear Sirs ,
I've seen quite strange behavior of new clamd:
I try to send a message with virus:
If old clamd 0.6 used:
clamd.log
Tue Oct 19 07:25:47 2004 - +++ Started at Tue Oct 19 07:25:47 2004
Tue Oct 19 07:25:47 2004 - Log file size limited to 1048576 bytes.
Tue Oct 19 07:25:47 2004 -
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 01:34 am, Meni Shapiro wrote:
Two or more scanners from different vendors are recommended in these
days...
OK, but the more is NOT the marrierthe more you got the more
problems you have with interacting with the sendmail.
Either find a better mailer, or
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:46:21 -0500
Jeff Smelser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I KNOW thatand i still work clamAV...I'm not looking for
guarantees, just striving for perfection
All I ment to say is that I learned of a problem (through the
mailing list!!) and is it going to be fixed??
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 08:49 am, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Jeff Smelser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I KNOW thatand i still work clamAV...I'm not looking for
guarantees, just striving for perfection
All I ment to say is that I learned of a problem (through the
mailing list!!) and is
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:32:08 +0200 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Graham Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Won't standard exim work with LDAP, assuming you set correct
If only I had a standard Exim, or the source and patches.
parameter during compile? I compiled one successfully, but
I'd suggest
Alex Pleiner wrote:
* Kareem Mahgoub [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-10-19 10:32]:
Hello list,
I have upgraded from clamav 075.1 to clamav-80 using the rpm for FC2.
after the upgrade, qmail-scanner ( 1.23 ) is not detecting clamav.
I have recompiles qmail-scanner, ran qmail-scanner.pl -z and
On Tuesday 19 Oct 2004 08:32, christian laubscher wrote:
when i enter 'clamd -V' i get a version line reflecting the i get a
version line indicating the current database version, eg .../535/...,
currently.
the clamav-milter X-Virus-Scanned lines, however, seem to reflect the
version
I saw on my monitoring application just now that clamav was outdated and that
i must update immediately. I was running 0.80rc3, and the moment I got this
message i was inundated with users complaining that any jpeg attachment is
flagged as a virus / comment 1.
I upgraded to 0.80rc4 and the jpeg
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 15:07, Scott Ryan wrote:
I saw on my monitoring application just now that clamav was outdated and that
i must update immediately. I was running 0.80rc3, and the moment I got this
message i was inundated with users complaining that any jpeg attachment is
flagged as a
ClamAV databases updated (2004.10.19 12:59 +): daily.cvd
version: 540
Submission: n/a
Sender: Trog
Updated: Exploit.JPEG.Comment.1
I dont know about anyone else, but this caused me huge issues...
Flagged every jpeg attachment as a virus on 0.80rc3.
Upgraded to 0.80rc4 and problem went away.
I saw on my monitoring application just now that clamav was outdated and
that
i must update immediately. I was running 0.80rc3, and the moment I got
this
message i was inundated with users complaining that any jpeg attachment is
flagged as a virus / comment 1.
I upgraded to 0.80rc4 and the
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:09:54 +0200
Scott Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ClamAV databases updated (2004.10.19 12:59 +): daily.cvd
version: 540
Submission: n/a
Sender: Trog
Updated: Exploit.JPEG.Comment.1
I dont know about anyone else, but this caused me huge issues...
Flagged every
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Trog wrote:
You should leave your cave more often :-)
-trog
. . This from someone calling himself trog ? :-)
-Chris
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 967-7816
WestNet Internet Services of
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 15:49, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Trog wrote:
You should leave your cave more often :-)
. . This from someone calling himself trog ? :-)
Ohh, the irony :-)
-trog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hello all.
I just upgraded to the new ClamAV 0.80. I use the
clamscan command along with the --leave-temps flag to
generate the main.db and daily.db files. I am using a
SMTP proxy spam program called ASSP that uses these db
files for preliminary virus detection. The
--leave-temps flag, which
I recently switched from Fedora Core 1 to Fedora Core 2. At the same
time I upgraded to clamav 0.80. I have been using 'clamscan /' to scan
my system in cron.daily. I am now running the clamd daemon and have
changed from to 'clamscan /' to 'clamdscan /'.
I am getting access denied messages
On 10/19/04 17:26, Pete D wrote:
Hello all.
I just upgraded to the new ClamAV 0.80. I use the
clamscan command along with the --leave-temps flag to
generate the main.db and daily.db files. I am using a
SMTP proxy spam program called ASSP that uses these db
files for preliminary virus detection.
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 16:34, Trog shaped the electrons to say:
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 15:07, Scott Ryan wrote:
I saw on my monitoring application just now that clamav was outdated and
that i must update immediately. I was running 0.80rc3, and the moment I
got this message i was
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 16:38, Tomasz Kojm shaped the electrons to say:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:09:54 +0200
Scott Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ClamAV databases updated (2004.10.19 12:59 +): daily.cvd
version: 540
Submission: n/a
Sender: Trog
Updated: Exploit.JPEG.Comment.1
Thanks for the great tip! The sigtool command works
beautifully. However, it does make me wonder if there
is a bug with the leave-temps flag.
Thanks again.
--- aCaB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/19/04 17:26, Pete D wrote:
Hello all.
I just upgraded to the new ClamAV 0.80. I use the
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
Pete D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all.
I just upgraded to the new ClamAV 0.80. I use the
clamscan command along with the --leave-temps flag to
generate the main.db and daily.db files. I am using a
SMTP proxy spam program called ASSP that uses
Just upgraded my FreeBSD 4.10 to exim 4.43 exiscan patch 28 and clamav
0.80 using ports.
I mow get the error
malware acl condition: clamd: connection to, 127.0.0.1, port 3310 failed
(Bad file descriptor)
Any help would be appreciated
Thanks
Graeme
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:17:11 +0100 (BST) in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Graeme
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
malware acl condition: clamd: connection to, 127.0.0.1, port 3310
failed(Bad file descriptor)
Can you post the av_scanner entry in your exim.conf file and the socket
entries from clamd.conf.
--
Tomasz,
I posted your response here to the ASSP forum. In the
ASSP documentation, it mentions that ASSP lacks the
ability to block all viruses (I guess that is what
they mean by basic anti-virus filtering). I use
ASSP in combination with a amavisd/clamd setup.
Whatever ASSP doesn't catch, the
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 at 11:38:17 -0400, Peter A Farago wrote:
I recently switched from Fedora Core 1 to Fedora Core 2. At the same
time I upgraded to clamav 0.80. I have been using 'clamscan /' to scan
my system in cron.daily. I am now running the clamd daemon and have
changed from to
All,
Tried to upgrade to ClamAV 0.80 from 0.75.1. Failed to compile it.
~~~ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/clamav/0.80 's warnings -
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure:
Robin, Rob wrote:
All,
Tried to upgrade to ClamAV 0.80 from 0.75.1. Failed to compile it.
~~~ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/clamav/0.80 's warnings -
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?
Odhiambo Washington said:
* Graeme [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20041019 19:18]: wrote:
Just upgraded my FreeBSD 4.10 to exim 4.43 exiscan patch 28 and clamav
0.80 using ports.
I mow get the error
malware acl condition: clamd: connection to, 127.0.0.1, port 3310 failed
(Bad file descriptor)
Any
http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/6E00G2ABFY.html
Bit hard to say if this would impact ClamAV?
Does clam skip the decompression if the local/global header contain a
zero filesize? It sounds like from the article that those of use who
Yes, it does. Unfortunately.
The
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:59:02 +0100
lnx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have downloaded ver80 and now I'm not sure how to proceed. I've
read the manual but I can't info on how to upgrade, is it best to
remove the previous version or install over it.?
The first option.
--
oo.
I'm not sure what is more obnoxious. Top posting a short response ...
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:39:44 +0200
Kareem Mahgoub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the quick help.
I thought it is something in clamav not QS ( on a second thought, it
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what is more obnoxious. Top posting a short response ...
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:39:44 +0200
Kareem Mahgoub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the quick help.
Is there a reason that clamav comes with 777 modes in the tar? I would
hate for someone to change something while I'm compiling, even though my
parent directory is a bit more secure (700). Ideas?
--
Eric Wheeler
Vice President
National Security Concepts, Inc.
PO Box 3567
Tualatin, OR 97062
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 02:58 pm, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours.
WARNING: Invalid DNS reply.
This was just asked and answered.. Its telling something is suspicious with
the dns update, so it is looking for updates the old way.
Now pay attention next
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:58:56 -0500
Vernon A. Fort [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been getting the following warning with freshclam for the last
several hours.
WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours.
WARNING: Invalid DNS reply.
All cvd files seem to be up-to-date but why am I getting
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:58:56 -0500
"Vernon A. Fort" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been getting the following warning with freshclam for the last
several hours.
WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours.
WARNING: Invalid DNS reply.
All cvd files seem to be
Tomasz Kojm wanted us to know:
WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours.
WARNING: Invalid DNS reply.
Please read my today's post in this case.
Could I suggest different verbage:
WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours, falling back to HTTP GET.
Would get rid of the questions of what does
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 04:29 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
Tomasz Kojm wanted us to know:
WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours.
WARNING: Invalid DNS reply.
Please read my today's post in this case.
Could I suggest different verbage:
WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours, falling
I'm using Clam AV 0.80 with Qmail-Scanner 1.23 and receive the following lines in my
clamd.log:
Tue Oct 19 15:22:34 2004 -
/var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/newmail01.readyhosting.com109821735148216078/1098217354.16090-1.newmail01.readyhosting.com:
Trojan.Dropper.JS.Zerolin-6 FOUND
Tue Oct 19 15:30:44
Am I the only one who sees several of the posters with embedded:
Content-Type: message/rfc822
that includes embedded text/plain attachments. Evolution opens them up
with only one extra step, but if I'm stuck with Outlook (or worse, OWA)
you have to open three levels of attachments to read the
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 05:20:38PM -0500, Daniel J McDonald said:
Am I the only one who sees several of the posters with embedded:
Content-Type: message/rfc822
that includes embedded text/plain attachments. Evolution opens them up
with only one extra step, but if I'm stuck with Outlook
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
Am I the only one who sees several of the posters with embedded:
Content-Type: message/rfc822
that includes embedded text/plain attachments. Evolution opens them up
with only one extra step, but if I'm stuck with Outlook (or worse, OWA)
you have to
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Damian Menscher wrote:
Yes, I'm seeing them, and they're annoying as hell. Most of them seem to be
from Trog, thought the other poster that said they were forwarded messages
broke his own claim, since his had the same issue.
Ah -- could this be people who PGP-sign their
Christopher X. Candreva wanted us to know:
Yes, I'm seeing them, and they're annoying as hell. Most of them seem to be
from Trog, thought the other poster that said they were forwarded messages
broke his own claim, since his had the same issue.
Ah -- could this be people who PGP-sign their
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 17:37, Jo Mills wrote:
Hi,
First let me apologize if this is way off the mark, but it has aroused
my curiosity. When you say freshclam fails, do you get a return
value of 1? I only ask because we have two Web Proxies in the office,
one is a Novell box and the
All,
When will the version of ClamAV 0.75-1 be expired? I hope it will be after I
solve my problem of supervise clamd of new version.
Thx Rgds,
Awie
- Original Message -
From: Awie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 7:57 PM
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 06:26:30PM -0700, Todd Lyons said:
Christopher X. Candreva wanted us to know:
Yes, I'm seeing them, and they're annoying as hell. Most of them seem to be
from Trog, thought the other poster that said they were forwarded messages
broke his own claim, since his had
Finally I can supervise new version of clamd. There are some parameter of
clamav.conf that no need anymore in clamd.conf. After editing some lines, it
works well.
However, Qmail-scanner still has unrecognize command that I sure it should
be OK.
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:50:22 EDT:4600: run
98 matches
Mail list logo
