On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 15:48 +0530, Mohamed Jahfar Sadiq M.R wrote:
Hi All,
I need to install a new Sendmail server with more security features like
ClamAV Anti Virus + Spam Assasin + Squirrel Mail + Sendmail. I was
really confused with where I should start working upon. So if anyone has
On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 12:39 +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:08:17 +0100
Julio Canto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm seeing from yesterday that the windows version (devel-20041205) of
the clam scanner doesn't like very much the last daily.cvd file. I
don't read
Freddie Cash wrote:
On December 15, 2004 08:57 am, Rainer Zocholl wrote:
In the really meanwhile long long linear list of mail scanners
I only see the (non GPLed) DansGuardian Anti-Virus Patch.
Do you mean that?
AFAIK is DansGuardian payware except for private use.
Please do at least the
Hi Freddie,
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:36:03 -0800, Freddie Cash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On December 15, 2004 08:57 am, Rainer Zocholl wrote:
In the really meanwhile long long linear list of mail scanners
I only see the (non GPLed) DansGuardian Anti-Virus Patch.
Do you mean that?
AFAIK is
Hi Russel,
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:00:48 -0500, roliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is Safesquid and SquidClamAV_Redirector. (scavr)
I use scavr with squid for a school district with great success. Neither
Dansguardian or Safesquid can handle very heavy loads in my experience.
I use
Is this a joke? licensed under the GPL not free for commercial
use.
As far as I can tell there is nothing wrong with this. In fact I've seen
this quite alot.
The GPL does not prevent anyone from making money.
___
BitFuzzy wrote the following on 12/16/2004 03:01 PM :
Is this a joke? licensed under the GPL not free for commercial
use.
As far as I can tell there is nothing wrong with this. In fact I've
seen this quite alot.
The GPL does not prevent anyone from making money.
Nothing prevents the author
BitFuzzy wrote:
Is this a joke? licensed under the GPL not free for commercial
use.
As far as I can tell there is nothing wrong with this. In fact I've
seen this quite alot.
The GPL does not prevent anyone from making money.
Since saying not free for commerical use pretty much means that
Hi,
I am having Redhat Linux 9 with sendmail 8.13 and
clamav-0.80 are installed.
When I try to update virus databse. I get error
[EMAIL PROTECTED] clamav-0.80]# freshclam
ClamAV update process started at Thu Dec 16 21:22:38
2004
Downloading main.cvd [*]
ERROR: Verification: Broken or not
I use scavr with squid for a school district with great success. Neither
Dansguardian or Safesquid can handle very heavy loads in my experience.
I use Squid on an OpenBSD 3.6 proxy. Could you please help me to the
links/resources on the net that would explaining installation of scavr
Linux vendors make from their product is in the sale of packaged
products or the sale of updates.
Hmm, good point I didn't think of that
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 16:42, Victor Cardenas Paredes wrote:
Hi
When I update, I get next error:
**
Downloading daily.cvd [*] daily.cvd updated (version: 631, sigs: 1750,
f-level: 3, builder: trog)
Database updated (28380 signatures) from db.pe.clamav.net (63.166.28.8).
ERROR:
Hi
When I update, I get next error:
**
Downloading daily.cvd [*] daily.cvd updated (version: 631, sigs: 1750,
f-level: 3, builder: trog)
Database updated (28380 signatures) from db.pe.clamav.net (63.166.28.8).
ERROR: Parse error at line 85: Unknown option StreamSaveToDisk.
ERROR: Clamd
Hi! :-D
We use clamd and clamav-milter 0.80 on a Dell PowerEdge 1650 with 2G of RAM.
We recieve about 200,000-250,000 emails a day and after a period of 30 mins to
4 hours, clamav-milter just quits.
I thought that it could be a process limit issue, because our sendmail
processes peak out at
zlib Version zlib-1.1.4
I am in the process of building CVS RPMs at the moment...
Doug
On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 16:21 -0500, Doug Eubanks wrote:
We start seeing maillog messages like this
Dec 16 16:37:24 Joe sendmail[1036]: iBGJaf54001036: Milter (clmilter):
write(A) returned -1,
Hi,
I am running Redhat 9 with sendmail 8.13 and
clamav-0.80 working o.k.
/etc/freshclam.conf is configured for
###
Checks 12
##
But freshclam updates virus databse more frequent than
specified. Here is log.
##
Dec 17 10:35:55 cliuedmz freshclam[28775]: Received
signal 14,
Could it be that when a virus is hidden in a file named
.filename, then clamd cannot detect it?
A copy of the mail in question is available at this link:
http://ns2.wananchi.com/~wash/Clamav/undetected
username: guest
password: guest
When I saved the attachment to .zip and ran clamdscan on it,
Hi All,
I need to install a new Sendmail server with more security features like
ClamAV Anti Virus + Spam Assasin + Squirrel Mail + Sendmail. I was
really confused with where I should start working upon. So if anyone has
already done a similar settings, please guide me through.
I need to create
Mohamed Jahfar Sadiq M.R wrote:
Hi All,
I need to install a new Sendmail server with more security features like
ClamAV Anti Virus + Spam Assasin + Squirrel Mail + Sendmail. I was
really confused with where I should start working upon. So if anyone has
already done a similar settings, please guide
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:08:17 +0100
Julio Canto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm seeing from yesterday that the windows version (devel-20041205) of
the clam scanner doesn't like very much the last daily.cvd file. I
don't read any report, I just see it not responding :? Any clue about
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 15:48 +0530, Mohamed Jahfar Sadiq M.R wrote:
Hi All,
I need to install a new Sendmail server with more security features like
ClamAV Anti Virus + Spam Assasin + Squirrel Mail + Sendmail. I was
really confused with where I should start working upon. So
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 19:12:56 +0530
Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DansGuardian 2 is:
* free for non-commercial use
* not free for installation by 3rd parties charging for
installation or support
* not free for commercial use
* licensed under the GPL
* copyright
Joe Maimon wrote:
BitFuzzy wrote:
Is this a joke? licensed under the GPL not free for commercial
use.
As far as I can tell there is nothing wrong with this. In fact I've
seen this quite alot.
The GPL does not prevent anyone from making money.
Since saying not free for commerical use
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:31:08 GMT Fernando Azevedo wrote:
My clamd-update keeps complaining that my clamd engine needs to be uptaded.
It reports a 0.80rc4 instead of the installed 0.80 I have running.
It is a fact that before installing 0.80 I had the 0.80rc4 but I've changed
that. Below are
Hi all!
My clamd-update keeps complaining that my clamd
engine needs to be uptaded. It reports a 0.80rc4 instead of the installed 0.80
I have running.
It is a fact that before installing 0.80 I had the
0.80rc4 but I've changed that. Below are some log lines to have a better
view of
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
So, can we provide commercial support or not? :)
The wording is kinda funky, it seems we can, but we just can't install it for
the person. So then there's the question of what's installing? etc etc
etc... sounds very funky :)
Allow me to preface
R Jansen wanted us to know:
I'm beginning to think that's the problem. It's a PIII 450 MHz machine with
384MB RAM. Like said the avarage rate was about 50 infected mails a day.
Really easy fix here for resource shortages, add another 256 or 512 Megs
of RAM.
But now the bsmtp server of the ISP
27 matches
Mail list logo
