RE: [Clamav-users] Clamscan bug/feature in Solaris

2005-02-28 Thread Plant, Dean
Dennis Peterson wrote: Naturally it is going to follow NFS mount points. That is what you asked it to do so why wouldn't it? And what you are doing is a rather nutty thing to attempt, as well. This is a user problem, not a software problem. The solution is to scan selectively as in

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamscan bug/feature in Solaris

2005-02-28 Thread Alberto da Silva
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:17:42 -, Plant, Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nutty I may be :-) but scanning selectively is fine for a few machines but what if you have fifty machines with varying configurations. This approach would mean an extra administrative overhead to guarantee all machines do

[Clamav-users] problems with ScanMail and digests

2005-02-28 Thread Steve Platt
We are having problems with certain mailing list digests that cause clamav to recurse impressively. I see a hint about a similar problem on the developers list but haven't seen anything on this users list yet. A typical 170kB digest containing about 90 messages took 7 hours to scan and

Re: [Clamav-users] problems with ScanMail and digests

2005-02-28 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:30:55 + Steve Platt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are having problems with certain mailing list digests that cause clamav to recurse impressively. I see a hint about a similar problem on the developers list but haven't seen anything on this users list yet. A

[Clamav-users] Clamav Install RH7.3

2005-02-28 Thread Stoffel Bester
hi Just having a issue installing clamav on my Redhat 7.3 box, getting some c compiler error configure: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH. Thanks ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

RE: [Clamav-users] Clamscan bug/feature in Solaris

2005-02-28 Thread Plant, Dean
Alberto da Silva wrote: On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:17:42 -, Plant, Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nutty I may be :-) but scanning selectively is fine for a few machines but what if you have fifty machines with varying configurations. This approach would mean an extra administrative overhead

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav Install RH7.3

2005-02-28 Thread Daniel J McDonald
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 09:05 -0500, Stoffel Bester wrote: hi Just having a issue installing clamav on my Redhat 7.3 box, getting some c compiler error configure: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH. Sounds like you either need to install a C compiler, or find some binary RPMs of

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav Install RH7.3

2005-02-28 Thread Brian Morrison
On 28 Feb 2005 09:05:46 -0500 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stoffel Bester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi Just having a issue installing clamav on my Redhat 7.3 box, getting some c compiler error configure: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH. Try: rpm -qa | grep gcc and see whether you

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav Install RH7.3

2005-02-28 Thread Stoffel Bester
hi I get libgcc1-3.2.2-3 gcc-cpp-3.2.2-3 On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 08:22, Brian Morrison wrote: On 28 Feb 2005 09:05:46 -0500 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stoffel Bester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi Just having a issue installing clamav on my Redhat 7.3 box, getting some c compiler error

RE: [Clamav-users] Clueless Newbies [was: (no subject)]

2005-02-28 Thread evan
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 22:58 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote: Is there a possibility there could be separate ClamAV mail lists for Linux and Windows newbies, and another for Email professionals? I can't be the only one who senses a need. I'd recommend against splitting: 1. Who is going to

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav Install RH7.3

2005-02-28 Thread Brian Morrison
On 28 Feb 2005 10:50:05 -0500 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stoffel Bester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get libgcc1-3.2.2-3 gcc-cpp-3.2.2-3 Then you need to install the gcc-3.2.2-5 package for RH 7.3, it will be on the CDs or you can have a look at rpmfind.net or similar sites for it. FYI, my RH 9

Re: [Clamav-users] problems with ScanMail and digests

2005-02-28 Thread Steve Platt
A typical 170kB digest containing about 90 messages took 7 hours to scan and exploded to 3900MB! The problem has been already fixed in CVS. Thanks Tomasz. I still have the problem that I cannot turn off ScanMail for the daemon clamd. That is, commented out or not, I still see this :-

Re: [Clamav-users] problems with ScanMail and digests

2005-02-28 Thread Stephen Gran
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 02:33:12PM +, Steve Platt said: A typical 170kB digest containing about 90 messages took 7 hours to scan and exploded to 3900MB! The problem has been already fixed in CVS. Thanks Tomasz. I still have the problem that I cannot turn off ScanMail for the

Re: [Clamav-users] problems with ScanMail and digests

2005-02-28 Thread Steve Platt
you need to use DisableDefaultScanOPtions ... A big Thank You Stephen! This option and its significance was hidden by reading:- # DO NOT TOUCH IT unless you know what you are doing. I suppose I should be congratulated for reading that one line, at least! Steve

RE: [Clamav-users] Clamscan bug/feature in Solaris

2005-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Plant, Dean said: Dennis Peterson wrote: Naturally it is going to follow NFS mount points. That is what you asked it to do so why wouldn't it? And what you are doing is a rather nutty thing to attempt, as well. This is a user problem, not a software problem. The solution is to scan

RE: [Clamav-users] Clueless Newbies [was: (no subject)]

2005-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Daniel J McDonald said: On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 22:58 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote: Is there a possibility there could be separate ClamAV mail lists for Linux and Windows newbies, and another for Email professionals? I can't be the only one who senses a need. I'd recommend against

RE: [Clamav-users] Clueless Newbies [was: (no subject)]

2005-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 22:58 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote: Is there a possibility there could be separate ClamAV mail lists for Linux and Windows newbies, and another for Email professionals? I can't be the only one who senses a need. I'd recommend against

RE: [Clamav-users] Clamav Install RH7.3

2005-02-28 Thread John Gallagher
On 28 Feb 2005 10:50:05 -0500 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stoffel Bester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get libgcc1-3.2.2-3 gcc-cpp-3.2.2-3 Then you need to install the gcc-3.2.2-5 package for RH 7.3, it will be on the CDs or you can have a look at rpmfind.net or similar sites for it. FYI, my RH 9

Re: [Clamav-users] Clueless Newbies [was: (no subject)]

2005-02-28 Thread Elizabeth Schwartz
I'd like to see one list, for similar reasons. I run Solaris but I can see that a lot of folks here run Linux, and if they were on a separate list probably all their general QA's would end up on that list, and I'd end up reading it anyway. And if most of the users migrated over there, it would be

[Clamav-users] php-clamav

2005-02-28 Thread Dale Walsh
I'm rewriting this module based on some functionality issues with the original code. If your interested, examne: (these are built in functions including the logo) http://www.daleenterprise.com/info.php (scroll down to see it, click the logo) and http://www.daleenterprise.com/clamav_info.php

[Clamav-users] socket-addr doesn't agree with sendmail.cf ... !!

2005-02-28 Thread Dave Smith
I use Fedora Core 3. On booting up I notice an error message which suggests a problem with the way in which ClamAV is set up. The following four lines from the boot log give an indication of what I mean: Feb 28 07:14:58 localhost clamav-milter: clamav-milter: socket-addr

Re: [Clamav-users] Exclude with clamdscan

2005-02-28 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:37:32 - Plant, Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tomasz Kojm wrote: Plant, Dean wrote: Is it possible to completely exclude the /net folder so that when clamscan hits this directory it does not check the contents of it? Yes, it's in my TODO. Done. Tue Mar

Re: [Clamav-users] socket-addr doesn't agree with sendmail.cf ... !!

2005-02-28 Thread Dave Smith
Clamav.conf has this in it: Title = Clamav LogFile = messages *OnlyService = clamd *RemoveHeaders sendmail.cf is probably too long t post here. What should I be looking for? On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 20:04 -0500, Dale Walsh wrote: On Feb 28, 2005, at 07:49, Dave Smith wrote: I use Fedora Core

Re: [Clamav-users] Exclude with clamdscan

2005-02-28 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:20:43 +0100 Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:37:32 - Plant, Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tomasz Kojm wrote: Plant, Dean wrote: Is it possible to completely exclude the /net folder so that when clamscan hits this directory it

Re: [Clamav-users] Exclude with clamdscan

2005-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Tomasz Kojm said: On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:20:43 +0100 Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:37:32 - Plant, Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tomasz Kojm wrote: Plant, Dean wrote: Is it possible to completely exclude the /net folder so that when clamscan hits

Re: [Clamav-users] socket-addr doesn't agree with sendmail.cf ... !!

2005-02-28 Thread Dale Walsh
in your sendmail, all that is important is anything related to ClamAV. Look in all your conf file and find where you specify the .sock file It's also not the only CLamAV conf file used in your install. -- Dale On Feb 28, 2005, at 08:34, Dave Smith wrote: Clamav.conf has this in it: Title = Clamav

Re: [Clamav-users] php-clamav

2005-02-28 Thread Steven Stern
Dale Walsh wrote: I'm rewriting this module based on some functionality issues with the original code. If your interested, examne: (these are built in functions including the logo) http://www.daleenterprise.com/info.php (scroll down to see it, click the logo) and

[Clamav-users] Port for openbsd

2005-02-28 Thread Penny Rand
I'm looking for a port for OpenBSD 3.6 for Clamav. ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] Port for openbsd

2005-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Penny Rand said: I'm looking for a port for OpenBSD 3.6 for Clamav. Did you know that with a basic Unix system that includes GCC you can build this from source in less than 10 minutes? It is really quite easy, can be scripted for repeatability, and frees you from this dependancy. dp