On Thursday 14 Apr 2005 01:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're correct, clamav-milter won't listen on a TCP port, only on a local
socket.
Wrong.
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bandsman.co.uk
On Thursday 14 Apr 2005 02:42, Carl Thompson wrote:
If clamav-milter is nothing but a portal so to speak and doesn't cause much
load thats fine but I thought clamav-milter now has clamd inherant in it (no
longer needing to communicate with clamd).
This would increase the load of
On Thursday 14 Apr 2005 00:55, Carl Thompson wrote:
Sendmail must connect to clamav-milter not clamd directly but clamav-milter
will not listen on a TCP port
Yes it will.
Carl
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 14 Apr 2005 00:00, Carl Thompson wrote:
I looked at the document and it gives a milter rule for sendmail to connect
to a remote clamav-milter process:
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clamav', `S=inet:[EMAIL PROTECTED], F=, T=S:4m;R:4m')dnl
and the install doc says to put
Doug Hardie wrote:
I have been running clamav for quite some time now. For most of that
time I was receiving between 1500 and 2000 viruses per day. However,
lately the number is down to about 200 per day. I don't have any users
complaining about receiving viruses so I don't think there is a
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 07:39:41 +0200
christian laubscher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
84rc1 (same in cvs) freshclam, manager.c:
__cut__
if(optl(opt, on-update-execute))
arg = getargl(opt, on-update-execute);
else if((cpt = cfgopt(copt, OnUpdateExecute)))
Doug Hardie wrote:
I have been running clamav for quite some time now. For most of that
time I was receiving between 1500 and 2000 viruses per day. However,
lately the number is down to about 200 per day. I don't have any users
complaining about receiving viruses so I don't think
Thanks Rick, i will check the wiki.
Hans
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:00:28 -0400, Rick Macdougall wrote
Hans Poo wrote:
Hi
I'am reposting to myself. Yesterday i made a question of the subject, i felt
really bad when someone respond me the answer was in the faq.
I felt with the
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
About the same here, almost one years worth of data
http://newmail.axess.com/qmailmrtg/clamd.html
Regards,
Rick
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Rick,
Would you mind sharing where you got the mrtg setup for
R. Scott Baer wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
About the same here, almost one years worth of data
http://newmail.axess.com/qmailmrtg/clamd.html
Rick,
Would you mind sharing where you got the mrtg setup for clamav, or if
you would mind sharing your setup/config ? This has been on my todo
list for
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 08:29:44AM -0400, Samuel Benzaquen wrote:
I have been running clamav for quite some time now. For most of that
time I was receiving between 1500 and 2000 viruses per day. However,
lately the number is down to about 200 per day. I don't have any users
We've
hello,
i have just updated my clamav to 0.83 and this is showing up in the log file
does anyone know what might my problem be or how to solve it ?
any advice would be appreciated
PS: the system is Fedora Core 2, Sendmail 8.12.11, and clamav 0.83
wilhelm
Hi Folks,
After installing the package, which went smoothly, and starting
the clamd-daemon with: ./clamd I got stuck.
Starting the daemon generated the following info in the clamd.log:
+++ Started at Wed Apr 13 18:05:00 2005
clamd daemon 0.83 (OS: linux-gnu, ARCH: i386, CPU: i686)
Log
Wim Janssen wrote:
Hi Folks,
After installing the package, which went smoothly, and starting
the clamd-daemon with: ./clamd I got stuck.
Starting the daemon generated the following info in the clamd.log:
+++ Started at Wed Apr 13 18:05:00 2005
clamd daemon 0.83 (OS: linux-gnu, ARCH: i386,
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 16:21 +0200, Wim Janssen wrote:
There is a daemon running, ps -ef | grep clam results into:
root 8352 1 0 Apr13 ?00:00:00 lt-clamd
From here I expected that the command: SCAN, VERSION etc. became
available from the prompt. But here is what I got
On 4/14/05, Wilhelm du Plessis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello,
i have just updated my clamav to 0.83 and this is showing up in the log file
does anyone know what might my problem be or how to solve it ?
any advice would be appreciated
I'd advise posting the error...
--
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Thursday 14 Apr 2005 01:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're correct, clamav-milter won't listen on a TCP port, only on a
local socket.
Wrong.
*removes foot from mouth* oops, sorry...
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 4/14/2005 at 9:14 AM Nigel Horne wrote:
On Thursday 14 Apr 2005 00:00, Carl Thompson wrote:
I looked at the document and it gives a milter rule for sendmail to
connect to a remote clamav-milter process:
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clamav', `S=inet:[EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kiril Todorov
Sent: donderdag 14 april 2005 23:55
To: ClamAV users
Subject: [Clamav-users] Bagle-BB.rar
Hello list,
Just a quick warning to the ones still running 0.83.
There seems to be a
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Mark wrote:
As a rule, I do not bother with 'devel' versions (an anti-virus program
should, because of its often deeply ingrained use in the mail system,
always be stable, IMHO). So I must say I am a bit distressed to hear that
the current stable version (still 0.83) does
Kiril Todorov wrote:
Hello list,
Just a quick warning to the ones still running 0.83.
There seems to be a variation of Bagle which is being catched only by
the devel versions of clamav 0.84rc1 for example.
Online scanners showed that only Macaffee, nod32 and clam catch those
new bagle variations.
Hello list,
Just a quick warning to the ones still running 0.83.
There seems to be a variation of Bagle which is being catched only by
the devel versions of clamav 0.84rc1 for example.
Online scanners showed that only Macaffee, nod32 and clam catch those
new bagle variations.
So, admins - time
Daniel wrote:
Kiril Todorov wrote:
Hello list,
Just a quick warning to the ones still running 0.83.
There seems to be a variation of Bagle which is being catched only by
the devel versions of clamav 0.84rc1 for example.
Online scanners showed that only Macaffee, nod32 and clam catch
Hi Does anybody know of any nice http redirector/proxy
other than SCAVR (SquidClamAV Redirector). SCAVR has
to work with squid, which is too clumsy too me. I only
need the redirector functionality that can work with
clamav scanner. Thanks.
__
Do
24 matches
Mail list logo
