Would it be possible for someone to provide a readable
clamav-0.88.3.tar.gz.sig? This file seems to be
universally unreadable on all the mirrors.
Rob
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Hi,
I'm new to this list and a new user of clamav on a Mac platform.
Today I received a message to upgrade clamav.
I downloaded the new version from a U.K. mirror and the download was
flagged by clamav and put into my quarantine folder.
I tried downloading from three other mirrors with the
On 7/13/06, Tilo Riemer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for the reply. I removed the = signs from the config file but
still the error is persisting.
What happens if you try
ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
? (without port nb)
hey,
ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ssh test1 192.168.2.13
ssh: connect
It sounds like your clamav is finding the test virus files and then
flagging the whole download as bad. As long as you don't have clamav
altering the file you should be fine to move it and build the new
version.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Staudenmayer wrote:
Nicholas J Adams wrote:
I'm new to this list and a new user of clamav on a Mac platform.
Today I received a message to upgrade clamav.
I downloaded the new version from a U.K. mirror and the download was
flagged by
Charles Swiger wrote:
However, also please note that sometimes people have Excel or Word
docs that were infected and then cleaned, which still contain some
viral fingerprints that ClamAV recognizes. If you can quarantine some
of these files and double-check with some other viral scanners, you
Jason Haar wrote:
Charles Swiger wrote:
However, also please note that sometimes people have Excel or Word
docs that were infected and then cleaned, which still contain some
viral fingerprints that ClamAV recognizes. If you can quarantine some
of these files and double-check with some other
Ultimately I would rather define by domain which files get scanned as a
temporary solution until I upgrade the mail server to a collaboration type
server. If this isn't possible without upgrading to something more along
the lines of AmaVIS, then I will bite the bullet and wait, because I don't
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 02:41:52PM -0500, Nathan Tullis wrote:
Ultimately I would rather define by domain which files get scanned as a
temporary solution until I upgrade the mail server to a collaboration type
server. If this isn't possible without upgrading to something more along
the lines
