Hi there,
I would like to commit many virus that clamav cannot discover at this
moment,what should I do?
I've already know the names of them by using other antivirus software.
Regards,
Aron Xu
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit
Hi there,
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 Dennis Peterson wrote:
G.W. Haywood wrote:
My point was that it's ten times as big as it should be
Which begs the question: How big should it be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mail]$ tar czv clamav-0.93.3/database/ database.tgz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mail]$ tar czv
Aron schrieb:
Hi there,
I would like to commit many virus that clamav cannot discover at this
moment,what should I do?
I've already know the names of them by using other antivirus software.
Regards,
Aron Xu
___
Help us build a comprehensive
That is for sending one virus at a time. I would email Tomasz and ask him if
there is a better way (or just as a common sourtesy of sending many samples
at once).
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Robert Schetterer [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Aron schrieb:
Hi there,
I would like to commit many
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Spiro Harvey, Knossos Networks Ltd wrote:
Bandwidth costs money. How big will the database have to grow before
the ClamAV team starts to take notice? Fifty megabytes? A hundred?
Americans don't understand this dilemma. To them traffic is free...
Minor correction: RICH
Charles Gregory wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Spiro Harvey, Knossos Networks Ltd wrote:
Bandwidth costs money. How big will the database have to grow before
the ClamAV team starts to take notice? Fifty megabytes? A hundred?
Americans don't understand this dilemma. To them traffic is free...
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:00:46PM +1000, Bill Maidment wrote:
Perhaps we could have two versions; one with a recent database, and one with
an empty
database. Then let the user decide which he requires.
I agree, Sourceforge mirrors are pretty slow these days. ;)
This reminds me, I'd rather
It will be a bad day for all when poor people set the standards of
quality and functionality for the rest of the world. It will happen only
at the point of a gun. Get over it. Meanwhile, I believe you can pick
and choose what you need from the cvs server, no?
dp
That is really arrogant,
reiner otto wrote:
It will be a bad day for all when poor people set the standards of
quality and functionality for the rest of the world. It will happen only
at the point of a gun. Get over it. Meanwhile, I believe you can pick
and choose what you need from the cvs server, no?
dp
That
--- Dennis Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Mi, 20.8.2008:
Von: Dennis Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.94rc1
An: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Datum: Mittwoch, 20. August 2008, 18:05
reiner otto wrote:
It will be a bad day for
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Minor correction: RICH Americans (and Canadians) don't appreciate this
dilemma. All the POOR people still using dial-up internet are the victims
It will be a bad day for all when poor people set the standards of
quality and functionality for the
Guys,
It's about time to let this thread die.
The full database is distributed with full releases to let our mirrors
save some bandwidth. At least some people grabbing the release tarball
won't hit them with full main.cvd requests.
If you can't be arsed or can't afford downloading the tarball
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:17:52 -0500
Brandon Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is for sending one virus at a time. I would email Tomasz and ask
him if there is a better way (or just as a common sourtesy of sending
many samples at once).
Exactly how may viruses are you purporting to have?
--
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:35:07 -0400 (EDT)
Charles Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pity you can't read what is written. I never suggested lowering
standards, I actually suggested returning to a *higher* standard,
where people don't just use bloated tools to write bloated code, but
return to
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:35:07 -0400 (EDT)
Charles Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Minor correction: RICH Americans (and Canadians) don't appreciate this
dilemma. All the POOR people still using dial-up internet are the victims
It will be a bad
Brian Morrison wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:35:07 -0400 (EDT)
Charles Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, given that you have to get the signature database somehow, how do
you propose that it's done? I suppose that a version without this is
possible, but suppose I then build it on my Linux
On 2008-08-20 17:31, Henrik K wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:00:46PM +1000, Bill Maidment wrote:
Perhaps we could have two versions; one with a recent database, and one with
an empty
database. Then let the user decide which he requires.
I agree, Sourceforge mirrors are pretty
On 2008-08-20 14:32, Aron wrote:
Hi there,
I would like to commit many virus that clamav cannot discover at this
moment,what should I do?
I've already know the names of them by using other antivirus software.
If you've scanned your samples at virustotal or jotti they are submitted
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 05:40:55PM +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
On 2008-08-20 17:31, Henrik K wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:00:46PM +1000, Bill Maidment wrote:
Perhaps we could have two versions; one with a recent database, and one
with an empty
database. Then let the user decide
19 matches
Mail list logo
