Hi,
I would like to make a test (via cron) on a directory :
clamscan -ir --no-summary ~/.mozilla-thunderbird
this line works great, but takes time. So I have tested with clamdscan
and it works great, but the files must be readable for the user. And
there are not.
How can I solve this problem ?
Hi,
I have done a small bash script, which scans my ~/.mozilla-thunderbird
directory via cron. To test it I have send me an email with the test of
eicar in the message (not in attachment).
When I launch clamscan or clamdscan on the INBOX file clamav detects
nothing. But if I read the INBOX file
giggz wrote:
How can I solve this problem ?
Hi giggz,
There are several things you may want to try.
If you are on a SMP the multiscan option in clamd/clamdscan is probably
what you need.
As for the privileges go, if your clamd is running on the local host and
is accessible via unix socket, you
Hi,
I would like to have the same output as clamscan -i, but with the
clamav daemon. Is it possible ?
Thx a lot
regards,
Guillaume
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
aCaB a écrit :
giggz wrote:
How can I solve this problem ?
Hi giggz,
There are several things you may want to try.
If you are on a SMP the multiscan option in clamd/clamdscan is probably
what you need.
As for the privileges go, if your clamd is running on the local host and
is accessible
--On 3 October 2008 22:31:32 +0200 Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David F. Skoll wrote:
I suspect the Clam developers do it the way they do to force users to
look at (and think about) their configuration files. This is a laudable
goal, but really interferes with usability and creates
On 2008-10-03 22:25, Charles Gregory wrote:
CONCRETE SUGGESTION FOR CLAMAV DEVELOPERS (and anyone else with
minimal script writing skills):
CLAMWATCH service.
Either as cron job, or constantly running monitor daemon.
- Checks if clamd service is running (if enabled in startup
Hi All,
There are a few changes to the Sanesecurity signature names and database
names (including updated downlaod scripts).
Please read the following, as it contains all the information on the new
changes:
http://www.sanesecurity.co.uk/clamav/changes.pdf
Cheers,
Steve
Sanesecurity
On 06.10.08 11:27, giggz wrote:
I have done a small bash script, which scans my ~/.mozilla-thunderbird
directory via cron. To test it I have send me an email with the test of
eicar in the message (not in attachment).
When I launch clamscan or clamdscan on the INBOX file clamav detects
Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
On 06.10.08 11:27, giggz wrote:
I have done a small bash script, which scans my ~/.mozilla-thunderbird
directory via cron. To test it I have send me an email with the test of
eicar in the message (not in attachment).
When I launch clamscan or clamdscan on the
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Eric Rostetter wrote:
The principle of least surprise says
But it is a big surprise when the action that old line was supposed to take
is no longer taken...
But NOT as big a surprise as NO FILTERING AT ALL. That's the sticking
point here. Unless we are all expected to
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Hopefully they're not running mail servers on the Internet elsewise they
could easily be considered derelict in their responsibilities.
Ah. Yes, I must be 'derelict' because there is only ONE sysadmin (me) and
I go home on weekends?
Heck, I'm not
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Eric Rostetter wrote:
But when a mail filter 'fails', mail goes through UNFILTERED,
and UNNOTICED. This is just WRONG. Sorry, it is.
The OP was complaining that it did cause the mailer (exim) to stop.
Well, I feel sorry for him if this happens on a weekend when he's
Charles Gregory wrote:
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Eric Rostetter wrote:
The principle of least surprise says
But it is a big surprise when the action that old line was supposed to take
is no longer taken...
But NOT as big a surprise as NO FILTERING AT ALL. That's the sticking
point here.
Charles Gregory wrote:
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Hopefully they're not running mail servers on the Internet elsewise they
could easily be considered derelict in their responsibilities.
Ah. Yes, I must be 'derelict' because there is only ONE sysadmin (me) and
I go home on
I can appreciate both sides. However, the general opinion I have heard
seems to echo what I would expect, and that is that the product let me know
if there is an error. Whether that be in a log file, an GUI display, or an
email message are just ways of implementing that solution.
Yes many
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
Well, it's probably better to not update in Friday in the first place.
H. Now that you mention it Yeah, I should set my cron jobs to
only update packages Monday through Thursday. (smile) Thanks!
(and people said this was a useless thread!) :)
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 11:37:51 -0400 (EDT)
Charles Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Hopefully they're not running mail servers on the Internet elsewise
they could easily be considered derelict in their responsibilities.
Ah. Yes, I must be 'derelict'
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 13:30 +0200, Colin Alston wrote:
[]
I'm not all that interested if you have time for that. I don't, and
neither do most end users regardless of your opinion about their
intellect or ability.
To put it simple and direct: If you don't have time to read the
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 11:37 -0400, Charles Gregory wrote:
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Hopefully they're not running mail servers on the Internet elsewise they
could easily be considered derelict in their responsibilities.
Ah. Yes, I must be 'derelict' because there is only
Hi,
When I run the command make check while trying to install clamav-0.94, i
get the following error:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lcheck
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [check_clamav] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/install/clamav/clamav-0.94/unit_tests'
make[1]:
Chandra wrote:
Hi,
When I run the command make check while trying to install clamav-0.94,
i get the following error:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lcheck
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [check_clamav] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
You need the check package installed (sudo apt-get install check on
debian/ubuntu).
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:57 PM, James Kosin [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Chandra wrote:
Hi,
When I run the command make check while trying to install
clamav-0.94, i get the following error:
/usr/bin/ld:
Chandra wrote:
Hi,
When I run the command make check while trying to install clamav-0.94,
i get the following error:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lcheck
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [check_clamav] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Jerry wrote:
I find it hard to believe that ClamAV could be down for *weeks* and
nobody has notice.
Well, in my case, it was a couple of days, but again, it was quite
disturbing that the first indication of 'trouble' was that I noticed
'error code 3' being returned in
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
What could be more obvious than simply stopping to work?
Why do they have an 'oil light' in cars? When your oil gets too low, the
vehicle doesn't stop running. It keeps going, even though it is tearing
the insides of the engine apart from lack of
I think everyone should calm down.
Both sides are right: Sysadmins should upgrade carefully and RTFM.
But also, software vendors should try not to break things or surprise users.
The problem is that historically, it has often been necessary to upgrade
Clam in a hurry because of a security
I am thankful that the underlying spirit of providing good quality
software to those who can't really afford it is not tainted by people
with attitudes like yours.
- Charles
Respect. I have to agree 100% on your very (too ?) polite expression.
Good software simply tells the user, that
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, David F. Skoll wrote:
1) Issue security updates that *only* fix security problems and
nothing else. This is something that (for example) Red Hat Enterprise
...
I use CentOS and notice that it auto-updates to the latest ClamAV.
And strictly speaking, that is a good thing.
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:46:07 + (GMT)
reiner otto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am thankful that the underlying spirit of providing good quality
software to those who can't really afford it is not tainted by people
with attitudes like yours.
- Charles
Respect. I have to agree 100% on your
On 2008/10/07 12:05 AM Jerry wrote:
Just out of morbid curiosity, who is holding a gun to your head forcing
you to use 'hobby products' anyway? No one is being forced to do
anything, therefore they have no discernible right to demand that the
developer of the product they are using change it
31 matches
Mail list logo
