Re: [Clamav-users] Re: pdf zip module failure

2007-02-24 Thread Robert Allerstorfer
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, 19:42 GMT+01 Robert Allerstorfer wrote: On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, 15:17 GMT+10 Bill Maidment wrote: How do you switch off pdf scanning, so I can get the the pdf in. Unfortunately, there seems to be no way to disable PDF scanning in ClamAV 0.90. I am currently using

[Clamav-users] Why is clamscan compiled with libcurl support per default?

2007-02-24 Thread Robert Allerstorfer
Hi, I am wondering why clamscan will be compiled with libcurl support per default, when a supported libcurl version has been found to be present. Currently, we have to add '--with-libcurl=no' to the configure options to get rid of the nasty libcurl stuff (on Linux it will lead to load 16 instead

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90?

2007-02-21 Thread Robert Allerstorfer
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, 09:47 GMT+00 Nick Leverton wrote: You are not authorized to access bug #295 I am logged into the bugzilla. Is there any estimate of time to fix ? If this problem has been known about for a week ? We rely heavily on Clam's phishing detection and I'm very pleased with

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: pdf zip module failure

2007-02-18 Thread Robert Allerstorfer
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, 15:17 GMT+10 Bill Maidment wrote: How do you switch off pdf scanning, so I can get the the pdf in. Unfortunately, there seems to be no way to disable PDF scanning in ClamAV 0.90. I am currently using this workaround: clamscan --exclude=.+\.pdf$ This skips scanning all

Re: [Clamav-users] Scan report problems with 0.90...

2007-02-18 Thread Robert Allerstorfer
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, 02:05 GMT+01 Jan-Pieter Cornet wrote: The README file says that --enable-experimental adds performance, but I found it only slows things down further, what sort of speedup is expected with the experimental code? The --enable-experimental switch adds url-based phishing

Re: [Clamav-users] Scan report problems with 0.90...

2007-02-17 Thread Robert Allerstorfer
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, 09:07 GMT-05 Robert S. Carroll wrote: With the old clamav, I ran a daily cron job that included saving the scan report to a file: clamscan -r -l /home/scan.txt --exclude=some_files --exclude=some_more_files /home This worked well and the -l simply added the summary

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: pdf zip module failure

2007-02-16 Thread Robert Allerstorfer
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, 15:56 GMT+00 Ian Abbott wrote: It's hard to tell what fixes are in the current development snapshot as they're out of date and the SVN server is disabled at the moment. It has never been enabled so far. The CVS server has been shut down before 0.90 came out and since then

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90?

2007-02-16 Thread Robert Allerstorfer
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, 07:36 GMT-08 Bill Landry wrote: (Rolf E. Sonneveld): Did you see any performance or crash issues after the recompile-without-experimental? /rolf No issues to report yet - hope it stays that way... Enabling the experimental code in 0.90 is dangerous because there has

Re: [Clamav-users] Minor bug on the home page

2007-02-16 Thread Robert Allerstorfer
Hi, On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, 11:35 GMT-05 Rick Macdougall wrote: When I click on the Support link, the page displays in Italian instead of English as all the other pages do. I have these issues all the time when i click around through the new website. The languages are changing randomly,

[Clamav-users] f-level of daily.cvd decreased from 10 to 9 since version 2161

2006-11-05 Thread Robert Allerstorfer
Hi, until daily.cvd version 2160 its f(unctionality)?-level was 10, as main.cvd version 41 also has. However, since daily.cvd updated (version: 2161, sigs: 1600, f-level: 9, builder: arnaud) the f-level is (still) down at 9, which causes freshclam to issue WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam says 0.90RC1.1 is outdated

2006-10-27 Thread Robert Allerstorfer
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, 13:23 GMT-04 Jim Maul wrote: Eric Peabody wrote: # freshclam -v (...) Software version from DNS: 0.88.5 WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! WARNING: Local version: 0.90RC1.1 Recommended version: 0.88.5 Of course it says its outdated, 0.90RC1.1 != 0.88.5

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamd 0.90RC1.1 version string

2006-10-27 Thread Robert Allerstorfer
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, 23:30 GMT+03 Ovidiu Bivolaru wrote: Example: v. 0.88.5 ClamAV 0.88.5/2108/Thu Oct 26 19:21:59 2006 v. 0.90RC1.1 ClamAV 0.90RC1.1 I guess your problem is another one. What is the output of /path_to/clamscan --debug --no-summary --tempdir=/dev/null 21 | sed -e

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: daily.wdb and daily.pdb

2006-10-17 Thread Robert Allerstorfer
Hello Sven, On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, 21:37 GMT+02 Sven Strickroth wrote: No, I update daily.pdb regularly, but this time I forgot to add this entry. I'll take care on my next update... That is great. However, the current daily.cvd does no more even contain a daily.pdb file. Where can it be

Re: [Clamav-users] daily.wdb and daily.pdb

2006-10-09 Thread Robert Allerstorfer
Hello Tomasz, On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, 23:51 GMT+02 Tomasz Papszun wrote: Submission-ID 495773 has been mentioned in the same announcement: Submission-ID: 495773 Sender: Anonymous Added: HTML.Phishing.Bank-820 oops, sorry for overseeing that. OK, so that mail will now be found by the

Re: [Clamav-users] daily.wdb and daily.pdb

2006-10-08 Thread Robert Allerstorfer
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, 22:14 GMT+02 Robert Allerstorfer wrote: On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, 10:59 GMT+03 Török Edvin wrote: On 10/3/06, Robert Allerstorfer wrote: How can yet undetected phishings be submitted to the project? Submit a sample: http://cgi.clamav.net/sendvirus.cgi, following the rules

Re: [Clamav-users] how to decern what to scan?

2006-10-06 Thread Robert Allerstorfer
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, 08:45 GMT-04 Jim Shupert, Jr. wrote: I have clam av on a redhat ES3 linux machine. I do not see where i can declare what directory it is to scan? what do I config to make that happen? like if I wanted to scan mnt/data ( where data is a mounted 2nd drive ) or

Re: [Clamav-users] daily.wdb and daily.pdb

2006-10-06 Thread Robert Allerstorfer
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, 10:59 GMT+03 Török Edvin wrote: On 10/3/06, Robert Allerstorfer wrote: Reading phishsigs_howto.pdf from the latest snapshot tarball, it says that each line must consist of *three* fields, in the form Flags RealURL DisplayedURL Is there an updated documentation where

[Clamav-users] daily.wdb and daily.pdb

2006-10-03 Thread Robert Allerstorfer
Hi, I am currently using the latest phishing-scan-urls enabled clamscan (devel-20061002) with a devel version of my procmail anti-virus filter (http://softlabsav.sourceforge.net/). Each incoming mail will first be scanned with the --phish-scan-alldomains option, in order to minimize the number of