[Clamav-users] A readable clamav-0.88.3.tar.gz.sig?

2006-07-12 Thread Robert Stampfli
Would it be possible for someone to provide a readable clamav-0.88.3.tar.gz.sig? This file seems to be universally unreadable on all the mirrors. Rob ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.86 memory leak?

2005-06-25 Thread Robert Stampfli
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 01:35:39AM -0500, Damian Menscher wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Robert Stampfli wrote: > > >On Linux, with the new ClamAV 0.86, I'm seeing a significant > >jump in the size of clamav-milter (w/o --external) each time > >a new database is l

[Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.86 memory leak?

2005-06-21 Thread Robert Stampfli
On Linux, with the new ClamAV 0.86, I'm seeing a significant jump in the size of clamav-milter (w/o --external) each time a new database is loaded. Is there per-chance a memory leak in the new code in this area? I did not observe this on earlier releases. Rob

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Follow-up on clamav-milter not mailing notice to postmaster

2005-05-14 Thread Robert Stampfli
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 09:49:01AM -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote: > Christopher X. Candreva said: > > > > May I add that it is really, really, really bad for clamav-milter to > > refuse > > to run at all, just because it can't write to it's log file ? > > > > I would much prefer it doing something a

[Clamav-users] Report Phishing attacks?

2005-03-20 Thread Robert Stampfli
ClamAV does an excellent job of expunging viruses, but I still get plenty of phishing emails through the filter daily. Perhaps the phishing email writers are much more prolific than the virus writers, but my understanding is that ClamAV is dedicated to catching both. My question: Does the ClamAV

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd on Solaris ceases functioning after a while

2005-02-17 Thread Robert Stampfli
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 12:01:12AM -0500, Igor Brezac wrote: > On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, David Blank-Edelman wrote: > > >Hi- > > Thanks for such a great program and all of the work being put into it. > >We're having a nasty problem with clamd 0.8x (even with 0.83 which we just > >installed yesterday)