On March 20, 2024 3:19:33 PM UTC, Ralph Seichter via clamav-users
wrote:
>* Damian via clamav-users:
>
>>> requirements.txt:
>>> requests >= 2.22.0
>>> SQLAlchemy >= 1.4.0
>>
>> Are those requirements sharp? I wonder if Fangfrisch could run on
>> older Debian systems with Debian-shipped
On February 29, 2024 12:56:47 PM UTC, Andrew C Aitchison via clamav-users
wrote:
>
>I haven't fully understood this yet, but Debian is planning a flag-day
>on 29 March to fix the y2038 bug on 32bit systems (possibly excluding
>intel).
>
On August 1, 2023 4:09:44 PM UTC, Fiorenza Meini via clamav-users
wrote:
>
>
>Il 31/07/23 18:06, Damian via clamav-users ha scritto:
>>> Then I configured amavis on another VM so that it has to contact CLamav
>>> through TCP connection to the VM where Clamav is installed.
>>> But the error
y decisions. But I didn't
want to leave you hanging either.
>
>Regards,
>Micah
>
>
>Micah Snyder
>ClamAV Development
>Talos
>Cisco Systems, Inc.
>
>
>From: clamav-users on behalf of Scott
Kitterman via clamav-users
>Sent: Thursday
I don't know if this is new or if I missed it before, but, now that I've
looked at https://docs.clamav.net/faq/faq-eol.html again, I have questions/
comments about the provision of signature support to EOL releases.
A little over a month ago (Feb 18) one of the Fedora clamav maintainers raised
On Thursday, March 23, 2023 4:23:28 PM EDT Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-
users wrote:
> Read this online at
> https://blog.clamav.net/2023/03/clamav-eol-of-0104x-versions.html
>
>
> Effective March 28, 2023, ClamAV 0.104.0 (and all patch versions) will no
> longer be supported in
No. Ubuntu package maintenance is separate from Debian's.
Scott K
On February 20, 2023 6:57:46 PM UTC, Newcomer01 via clamav-users
wrote:
>Does this mean, it affects the Ubuntu LTS too? This would be really great!
>
>Am 20. Februar 2023 19:44:51 schrieb Scott Kitterman via cla
LTS team uploaded it today, so it should be available for Buster shortly, if
it isn't already.
Scott K
On Monday, February 20, 2023 7:41:16 AM EST Scott Kitterman via clamav-users
wrote:
> Packages for Bullseye are available in bullseye -proposed-updates. Buster
> is now sup
Packages for Bullseye are available in bullseye -proposed-updates. Buster is
now supported by the Debian LTS team and I don't know their plans.
Scott K
On February 20, 2023 12:11:10 PM UTC, Brent Clark via clamav-users
wrote:
>Good day Guys
>
>Anyone on Debian Buster and Bullseye?
>
>How
On February 19, 2023 1:26:44 AM UTC, Michael Orlitzky via clamav-users
wrote:
>On 2023-02-18 15:40:55, Orion Poplawski via clamav-users wrote:
>>
>> This email is to start a discussion of what will happen with clamav
>> support in EPEL7 and EPEL8. In particular, to inform everyone that it
On February 18, 2023 10:40:55 PM UTC, Orion Poplawski via clamav-users
wrote:
>I'm one of the maintainers of the clamav package in Fedora and Fedora EPEL. I
>believe that the EPEL packages are currently one of the primary sources for
>users of clamav on RHEL based distributions.
>
>We were
lz4 was last updated in Debian in September 2022. If you're running Debian
Unstable and not upgrading packages for months, that's not a distro problem.
That said, lz4 isn't used by clamav, so whatever it was, that's likely a
coincidence.
Debian Unstable isn't for everyone. It's not uncommon
On January 8, 2023 5:40:55 AM UTC, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>On 1/6/23 14:29, Scott Kitterman via clamav-users wrote:
>> On Thursday, January 5, 2023 8:51:27 AM EST Scott Kitterman via clamav-users
>> wrote:
>>> We finally have Clamav 1.0.0 in Debian Unstable.
>>&g
On Thursday, January 5, 2023 8:51:27 AM EST Scott Kitterman via clamav-users
wrote:
> We finally have Clamav 1.0.0 in Debian Unstable.
>
> Unfortunately, unit tests fail on all big endian archs (shown in the PowerPC
> build log [1] - it's the same tests failing on all of them). D
We finally have Clamav 1.0.0 in Debian Unstable.
Unfortunately, unit tests fail on all big endian archs (shown in the PowerPC
build log [1] - it's the same tests failing on all of them). Does upstream
testing include big endian?
Does anyone have suggestions on how to fix it? I have access to
It's a Debian issue. I haven't figured it out yet as nothing changed that
seems like a likely source. In the meantime, the 0.103.7 package in Stable
works on Testing/Unstable, so you can use that
Scott K
On December 28, 2022 10:31:40 PM UTC, Alexander Lochmann
wrote:
>Hi all!
>
>I'm
It looks like the Ubuntu/Debian instructions are somewhat out of date
regarding installing CMake. Likely others too. In the currently published
instructions:
https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Installing/Installing-from-source-Unix.html
There's a note that says:
Note: Many of the instructions
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 4:13:55 PM EDT John wrote:
> I apologise in advance if this question is trivial but I am getting
> very lost.
>
> I have been running clamav as part of my mailer's anti-spam system for
> years. More recently I started using the Debian package rather that a
>
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 12:38:02 PM EST Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via
clamav-users wrote:
> HI Michael, Ged,
>
> clamav-milter is indeed a part of the clamav project. As Ged notes, it
> hasn't changed in many years - at least not since I started here over 4
> years ago.
>
> Unfortunately,
On July 28, 2021 11:53:35 PM UTC, "Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users"
wrote:
>
>Hi All,
>
>For the past couple of months I've been promoting the idea of having Long Term
>Support (LTS) feature releases for ClamAV within internal Talos communications.
>
>For the purposes of this
For Debian derived distributions like Ubuntu you are best off installing
distribution packages using apt. They are kept reasonably up to date and
resolution of security issues in the packages us supported by the Ubuntu
Security Team.
There are many Ubuntu and Debian specific resources on how
On Tuesday, February 11, 2020 4:23:18 PM EST John Shelton via clamav-users
wrote:
> The interface for cl_scanfile changed to accept a new struct cl_scan_options
> type from what used to be an int. Is there any backward compatibility for
> this change?
AFAIK, there isn't. You probably need to do
AL
> Unofficial because I mark every exe in archive as a virus. (as explained
> previously)
>
> On 04.02.20 22:33, Scott Kitterman via clamav-users wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 3:26:42 PM EST Ntek, SIA Janis wrote:
> >>> libclamunrar9
> >>
On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 3:26:42 PM EST Ntek, SIA Janis wrote:
> > libclamunrar9
>
> I already had that, didn't help. I will upgrade Debian 9.7 to 10
It's extremely unlikely to make any difference. They both have clamav 0.101
available and after this weekend's point release they will both
On February 4, 2020 1:28:45 AM UTC, "Gary R. Schmidt" wrote:
>On 04/02/2020 11:38, Ntek, SIA Janis wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I have Debian 9.7 w/ postfix and ClamAV 0.100.2 I have made custom
>> definition file /var/lib/clamav/archive_exe.cdb containing:
>> Archived_EXE:*:*:.*\.exe:*:*:*:*:*:*
On August 31, 2019 4:32:00 PM UTC, Henrik K wrote:
>On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 12:21:11PM -0400, Scott Kitterman via
>clamav-users wrote:
>>
>> Not to put too fine a point on it, but if you are unhappy with the
>service you
>> are receiving, you should switch to a d
On Saturday, August 31, 2019 12:04:36 PM EDT Henrik K wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 04:48:54PM +0100, G.W. Haywood via clamav-users
wrote:
> > More testing, by people prepared to chip in some effort instead of
> > complaining about something that they get for free, would be great.
>
> The
On Monday, August 12, 2019 4:49:01 PM EDT Nick Howitt wrote:
> On 12/08/2019 19:16, J.R. via clamav-users wrote:
> >> I would suggest not packaging them at all, and they
> >> should be downloaded from the update servers the
> >> first time the update is ran.
> >
> > Ideally yes, I would agree.
>
On August 4, 2019 11:32:09 PM UTC, "Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users"
wrote:
>Every product is different as to whether or not they provide security
>patches for older versions or how far back they patch.
>
>For ClamAV, our development team is very small and we have a lot on our
Debian Testing has the current version:
testing: 0.101.2+dfsg-1
You need to upgrade your packages. If you need help with that, you should use
a Debian specific support resource.
Scott K
___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
On Friday, May 31, 2019 8:50:13 AM EDT Maurizio Caloro wrote:
> Hello
>
> I try to setup clamav-milter to running with Postfix, i don't understund
> now not why Clam/Postfix cant Write/Access to this file.
>
> i try meny things now also root:root, Postfix:Postfix, Calmav and so
>
>
On Saturday, April 06, 2019 04:51:16 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >> On Apr 5, 2019, at 20:12, Scott Kitterman via clamav-users
> >> wrote: The unrar stuff is still free to
> >> use.
> >>
> >> Due to modification restrictions Debian sp
y good job as a clamav distributor.
Scott K
On April 6, 2019 12:21:05 AM UTC, "Joel Esler (jesler)"
wrote:
>Correct. Which is why we recommend people compile from source for full
>functionality.
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Apr 5, 2019, at 20:12,
On Friday, March 29, 2019 06:01:25 PM G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Micah Snyder wrote:
> > This won't help you right now, but our team has been discussing
> > publishing ClamAV on Linux using Snapcraft at the time of each
> > release. Snapcraft sounds
On March 12, 2019 11:22:05 AM UTC, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via clamav-users
wrote:
>On 12.03.19 13:58, Sunhux G via clamav-users wrote:
>>I'm on Solaris 10 x86 : we disabled compilers as part of our OS
>hardening;
>>much appreciated if someone can help me make/compile one for our OS.
>>So far
Isn't that issue fixed in 0.100.1?
As I recall, 0.101.0 and .1 didn't provide any security fixes, at least not as
identified as such.
Scott K
On March 12, 2019 3:51:03 AM UTC, Sunhux G via clamav-users
wrote:
>Does freshclam auto-update Clam's engine.
>
>Recently there's a vulnerability (
36 matches
Mail list logo
