No doubt a problem with logrotate. Is there a fix for this?
ERROR: /var/log/clamav/freshclam.log is locked by another process
ERROR: Problem with internal logger (UpdateLogFile
= /var/log/clamav/freshclam.log).
lsof | grep freshclam.log
freshclam 16920 root3wW REG 104,6
D.J. Fan wrote:
Thanks again ClamAV developers and maintainers. Today will be the
fourth time I submit a virus caught by ClamAV and missed by both Trend
Micro and Symantec to them. Obviously yet another new Bagle variant
caught by an older ClamAV signature:
A virus was found:
Chris Heiner wrote:
Are there any good command mode instructions to retrieve update information
and other log information on the Clam AV.? The only command we are aware of
is freshclam.
Commands:
freshclam (config file: /etc/freshclam.conf)
clamd (config file: /etc/clamd.conf)
Noel Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 01:12:02AM +, Thalador Du'Fosnee wrote:
Ok, let me get this right. Clamav cannot clean? What good is it?
Cleaning of viruses is a marketing ploy.
Very few viruses in recent years infect files, they overwrite the
good data in the file with their
Mike Lambert wrote:
Thank you, team ClamAV, for your your hard work on the latest release.
ClamAV 0.80 (FreeBSD 4.9) is by far the most stable and memory
efficient clamd yet.
*applause*
Regards,
Mike Lambert
___
I concur!! I did have problem with
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:58:56 -0500
"Vernon A. Fort" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been getting the following warning with freshclam for the last
several hours.
WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours.
WARNING: Invalid DNS reply.
All cvd
Vernon A. Fort wrote:
Steve Basford wrote:
Hi,
Can someone test ClamAV with these files:
http://www.hiddenbit.org/demo_files/jpeg.zip
Source:
http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-October/027530.html
Cheers,
Steve
___
http
Attempting to compile clamav-devel-latest on a redhat 7.2 or 7.3 box but
I'm getting autoconf / automake errors. Can I re-run the automake and
autoconf and if so, what are the command line args. Here's the output
just after the configure runs:
cd . /bin/sh /tmp/clamav-20040731/missing
I'm tring to understand the Build time string in the sigtoo -i daily.cvd
file:
Build time: 27 Jul 2004 15-12 +0200
specifically with the 15-12 +0200. I want to convert this to Central
time (US), any pointers.
Vernon
---
This SF.Net
Steven Stern wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:15:53 -0500, Vernon A. Fort
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm tring to understand the Build time string in the sigtoo -i daily.cvd
file:
Build time: 27 Jul 2004 15-12 +0200
specifically with the 15-12 +0200. I want to convert this to Central
time (US
I have email messages that are being detected as Worm.Bagle.Gen-zippwd
but when I unzip, clamav detects the binary as Bagle.AF. I cannot
submit a sample because its already detected.
If someone wants a few sample email messages, let me know where to send
them.
Vernon
Steve Lenti wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 08:39:16 -0500, Vernon A. Fort
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have email messages that are being detected as Worm.Bagle.Gen-zippwd
but when I unzip, clamav detects the binary as Bagle.AF. I cannot
submit a sample because its already detected.
If someone wants
Victor Yu wrote:
Greeting,
I just installed Clam on a Linux server. After installation, I run #clamscan
/usr/local/share/clamav/test, it found the virus, the output like this:
-
/usr/local/share/clamav/test/test1:
Antony Stone wrote:
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 9:57 am, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
I have several emails which clamav detects as 'Worm.SomeFool.Gen-2', but
Sophos nor McAcfee will detect the virus. Would this be some new
varient that clamav fould. From the description, this sig was added to
detect
I have several emails which clamav detects as 'Worm.SomeFool.Gen-2', but
Sophos nor McAcfee will detect the virus. Would this be some new
varient that clamav fould. From the description, this sig was added to
detect possible future varients of the NetSky viruses.
Should I submit this? or
I noticed that virusdb was updated, according to the clamav-virusdb
list, to daily version 226 but my freshclam is still reporting that 225
is the latest. Am I missing something?
Vernon
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux
Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
Vernon A. Fort Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 11:11 AM
I noticed that virusdb was updated, according to the clamav-virusdb
list, to daily version 226 but my freshclam is still reporting that 225
is the latest. Am I missing something?
FYI, my freshclam returns
17 matches
Mail list logo
