On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Eric Rostetter wrote:
The principle of least surprise says
But it is a big surprise when the action that old line was supposed to take
is no longer taken...
But NOT as big a surprise as NO FILTERING AT ALL. That's the sticking
point here. Unless we are all expected to
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Eric Rostetter wrote:
But when a mail filter 'fails', mail goes through UNFILTERED,
and UNNOTICED. This is just WRONG. Sorry, it is.
The OP was complaining that it did cause the mailer (exim) to stop.
Well, I feel sorry for him if this happens on a weekend when he's
Charles Gregory wrote:
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Eric Rostetter wrote:
The principle of least surprise says
But it is a big surprise when the action that old line was supposed to take
is no longer taken...
But NOT as big a surprise as NO FILTERING AT ALL. That's the sticking
point here.
) to support this
product.
Just my opinion,
John.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis Peterson
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 11:05 AM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] [0.0] Re: Handling of unknown configuration
lines (was Re
