Re: [Clamav-users] [EMAIL PROTECTED] undetected

2006-01-19 Thread Thomas Hochstein
James Miller schrieb: [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not be picked up by clamav. It is (and was) here: | 2006-01-18 09:34:18 [...] H=p54a7c5f6.dip.t-dialin.net (amd2) [84.167.197.246] F=[...] rejected after DATA: This message contains a virus (Worm.VB-8). Worm.VB-8 is ClamAV's name for [EMAIL

Re: [Clamav-users] [EMAIL PROTECTED] undetected

2006-01-19 Thread Gerard Seibert
Thomas Hochstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] James Miller schrieb: [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not be picked up by clamav. It is (and was) here: | 2006-01-18 09:34:18 [...] H=p54a7c5f6.dip.t-dialin.net (amd2) [84.167.197.246] F=[...] rejected after DATA: This message contains a virus (Worm.VB-8).

Re: [Clamav-users] [EMAIL PROTECTED] undetected

2006-01-19 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Gerard Seibert wrote: Thomas Hochstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] Worm.VB-8 is ClamAV's name for [EMAIL PROTECTED], according to the advisories I read. I believe that, that definition was only added on the 18th. On 2/16 and Not true. The first VB-8 I have logged is from 11:53

Re: [Clamav-users] [EMAIL PROTECTED] undetected

2006-01-19 Thread Bill Maidment
Christopher X. Candreva wrote: On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Gerard Seibert wrote: Thomas Hochstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] Worm.VB-8 is ClamAV's name for [EMAIL PROTECTED], according to the advisories I read. I believe that, that definition was only added on the 18th. On 2/16 and Not true. The

Re: [Clamav-users] [EMAIL PROTECTED] undetected

2006-01-19 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Bill Maidment wrote: Not true. The first VB-8 I have logged is from 11:53 EST on Jan 17 . That all depends on your time zone. EST in Australia may be different to EST somewhere else. Let's not get into a fight over this. I mean GMT-0500 . I wasn't aware there were any

Re: [Clamav-users] [EMAIL PROTECTED] undetected

2006-01-19 Thread Bill Maidment
Bill Maidment wrote: Christopher X. Candreva wrote: On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Gerard Seibert wrote: Thomas Hochstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] Worm.VB-8 is ClamAV's name for [EMAIL PROTECTED], according to the advisories I read. I believe that, that definition was only added on the 18th. On

Re: [Clamav-users] [EMAIL PROTECTED] undetected

2006-01-19 Thread Bill Maidment
Christopher X. Candreva wrote: On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Bill Maidment wrote: Not true. The first VB-8 I have logged is from 11:53 EST on Jan 17 . That all depends on your time zone. EST in Australia may be different to EST somewhere else. Let's not get into a fight over this. I mean

Re: [Clamav-users] [EMAIL PROTECTED] undetected

2006-01-19 Thread Brian Morrison
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 23:34:26 +1100 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Maidment [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (My state is oh dear I need another beer) A man has to believe in something, and I believe I'll have another beer. -- Brian Morrison bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 -

[Clamav-users] [EMAIL PROTECTED] undetected

2006-01-18 Thread James Miller
Hi all, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not be picked up by clamav. I'm running 0.88 and have the latest sigs (main version 35 and daily 1245). I know I should figure out how to write a sig for this but is an update expected soon? Thanks, Jim ___

Re: [Clamav-users] [EMAIL PROTECTED] undetected

2006-01-18 Thread Damian Menscher
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, James Miller wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not be picked up by clamav. I'm running 0.88 and have the latest sigs (main version 35 and daily 1245). I know I should figure out how to write a sig for this but is an update expected soon? Have you submitted a sample? If not,