Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-16 Thread Steve Basford
The script I use has a bit more finesse than this simple overview. I use a randomizer to prevent this process from running at the same minute past the hour Note there's a *tiny* chance if the script runs at 10.07 and then 11.03, you'll get temp block for an hour from some of the mirrors,

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-16 Thread Tom Shaw
At 8:42 AM +0100 10/16/09, Steve Basford wrote: The script I use has a bit more finesse than this simple overview. I use a randomizer to prevent this process from running at the same minute past the hour Note there's a *tiny* chance if the script runs at 10.07 and then 11.03, you'll get

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-16 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Tom Shaw wrote: Just to clarify winnow_malware.hdb is designed to detect malware payloads. Thus, it is effective in an email system only when the payload is attached (such as a dropper, etc). It is also very effective when used in file system/download checking scenarios. Thanks to Dennis

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-16 Thread Jari Fredriksson
16.10.2009 10:42, Steve Basford kirjoitti: I'd use: phish.ndb rougue.hdb winnow_malware_links.ndb winnow_malware.hdb Thanks, I have implemented these now with SaneSecurity Script 1. -- http://www.iki.fi/jarif/ Alas, how love can trifle with itself! -- William

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-16 Thread Dennis Peterson
Steve Basford wrote: The script I use has a bit more finesse than this simple overview. I use a randomizer to prevent this process from running at the same minute past the hour Note there's a *tiny* chance if the script runs at 10.07 and then 11.03, you'll get temp block for an hour from some

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-16 Thread Tom Shaw
Tom Shaw wrote: Just to clarify winnow_malware.hdb is designed to detect malware payloads. Thus, it is effective in an email system only when the payload is attached (such as a dropper, etc). It is also very effective when used in file system/download checking scenarios. Thanks to Dennis

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-16 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Tom Shaw wrote: If you submit a file to virus-samp...@oitc.com I'll process it for winnow_malware.hdb and at the same time send it to the ClamAV malware signature team and virustotal to check if others can detect. If you submit a url to malware to virus-samp...@oitc.com I'lldownload the

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-16 Thread Tom Shaw
Tom Shaw wrote: If you submit a file to virus-samp...@oitc.com I'll process it for winnow_malware.hdb and at the same time send it to the ClamAV malware signature team and virustotal to check if others can detect. If you submit a url to malware to virus-samp...@oitc.com I'lldownload the

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-16 Thread Dennis Peterson
Tom Shaw wrote: Tom Shaw wrote: If you submit a file to virus-samp...@oitc.com I'll process it for winnow_malware.hdb and at the same time send it to the ClamAV malware signature team and virustotal to check if others can detect. If you submit a url to malware to virus-samp...@oitc.com

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-16 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Tom Shaw wrote: As long as you don't obfuscate the url my scripts will isolate the url or the attached malware and process. Nice ! Can I send one URL per line ? I have 20 undetected virus. -- --- Jose Marcio MARTINS DA CRUZ

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-16 Thread Tom Shaw
At 8:14 AM -0700 10/16/09, Dennis Peterson wrote: Tom Shaw wrote: Tom Shaw wrote: If you submit a file to virus-samp...@oitc.com I'll process it for winnow_malware.hdb and at the same time send it to the ClamAV malware signature team and virustotal to check if others can detect. If you

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-16 Thread Tom Shaw
At 5:21 PM +0200 10/16/09, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: Tom Shaw wrote: As long as you don't obfuscate the url my scripts will isolate the url or the attached malware and process. Nice ! Can I send one URL per line ? I have 20 undetected virus. Yes it strips out all urls just don't

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-16 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Tom Shaw wrote: At 5:21 PM +0200 10/16/09, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: Tom Shaw wrote: Yes it strips out all urls just don't send with a signature that contains your home url or else it will get processed. Hopefully it will not return malware so it will be discarded as dead. ;-)

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Richard Chapman
I am interested in Tom's list of unofficial signatures - but haven't found the recommended way to use the signatures. Do I need to download them periodically - or do I just add an additional freshclam DataBaseMirror directive. In either case - exactly what is the url to download from - or to

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Steve Basford
I am interested in Tom's list of unofficial signatures - but haven't found the recommended way to use the signatures. Do I need to download them periodically - or do I just add an additional freshclam DataBaseMirror directive. In either case - exactly what is the url to download from - or to

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Tom Shaw
At 10:18 AM +0100 10/15/09, Steve Basford wrote: I am interested in Tom's list of unofficial signatures - but haven't found the recommended way to use the signatures. Do I need to download them periodically - or do I just add an additional freshclam DataBaseMirror directive. In either case

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Jari Fredriksson
15.10.2009 14:55, Tom Shaw kirjoitti: The samples I have of that one are being detected by ClamAV standard sigs as Trojan.Peed-477. Wonder why you and some others didn't detect it with standard sigs? Could this be a problem? Do you have samples that were undetectable? Tom Undetected

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Steve Basford
Steve, The samples I have of that one are being detected by ClamAV standard sigs as Trojan.Peed-477. Wonder why you and some others didn't detect it with standard sigs? Could this be a problem? Do you have samples that were undetectable? Not sure Tom... here's a quick test... Official

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Steve Basford
Undetected Outlook Express malware: h t t p :/ / www.iki.fi/jarif/malware/install.zip That's one of 'em: Sanesecurity.Rogue.736.UNOFFICIAL Cheers, Steve Sanesecurity ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Jari Fredriksson
Undetected IRS scam variant. http://www.iki.fi/jarif/malware/tax-statement.exe -- http://www.iki.fi/jarif/ A classic is something that everyone wants to have read and nobody wants to read. -- Mark Twain, The Disappearance of Literature pgptHhkej7lOn.pgp Description: PGP

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Tom Shaw
At 1:23 PM +0100 10/15/09, Steve Basford wrote: Undetected Outlook Express malware: h t t p :/ / www.iki.fi/jarif/malware/install.zip That's one of 'em: Sanesecurity.Rogue.736.UNOFFICIAL Well that one didn't get detected by standard ClamAV. Must be running multiple payloads That one

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Tom Shaw
At 3:14 PM +0300 10/15/09, Jari Fredriksson wrote: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==_20nrA2UWvqBocwzbhDgZQrQ22plLxr Content-Disposition: inline 15.10.2009 14:55, Tom Shaw kirjoitti: The samples I have of that one are being

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Tom Shaw
At 4:30 PM +0300 10/15/09, Jari Fredriksson wrote: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==_6GorA2txt0CVliaTmJuBPNhCIqDzZA Content-Disposition: inline Undetected IRS scam variant. http://www.iki.fi/jarif/malware/tax-statement.exe --

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Jari Fredriksson
15.10.2009 16:47, Tom Shaw kirjoitti: At 4:30 PM +0300 10/15/09, Jari Fredriksson wrote: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==_6GorA2txt0CVliaTmJuBPNhCIqDzZA Content-Disposition: inline Undetected IRS scam variant.

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Tom Shaw
At 1:23 PM +0100 10/15/09, Steve Basford wrote: Undetected Outlook Express malware: h t t p :/ / www.iki.fi/jarif/malware/install.zip That's one of 'em: Sanesecurity.Rogue.736.UNOFFICIAL FYI Official ClamAV sigs now detect as Trojan.Inject-2443 I just noticed that my

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Jari Fredriksson
Does ClamAV somehow dedicate to email format (base64) or how it is possible that is does not recognise this http://www.iki.fi/jarif/malware/FILE_UPS_c380a16.zip That's an UPS fraud, W32/Bredolab.D.gen!Eldorado by F-Prot. -- http://www.iki.fi/jarif/ An exotic journey in downtown Newark is in

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Jari Fredriksson
15.10.2009 17:24, Jari Fredriksson kirjoitti: Does ClamAV somehow dedicate to email format (base64) or how it is possible that is does not recognise this http://www.iki.fi/jarif/malware/FILE_UPS_c380a16.zip That's an UPS fraud, W32/Bredolab.D.gen!Eldorado by F-Prot. Uh. The point was

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Tom Shaw
At 5:24 PM +0300 10/15/09, Jari Fredriksson wrote: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==_T3prA2NkQhJdMqo4E_3U4WfuiiDVVM Content-Disposition: inline Does ClamAV somehow dedicate to email format (base64) or how it is possible that is

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Dennis Peterson
Richard Chapman wrote: I am interested in Tom's list of unofficial signatures - but haven't found the recommended way to use the signatures. Do I need to download them periodically - or do I just add an additional freshclam DataBaseMirror directive. In either case - exactly what is the url to

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-14 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Hello Tom, Tom Shaw wrote: Jose, If you use the unofficial signatures it might help you. See http://www.sanesecurity.co.uk/databases.htm One of my signatures, winnow_malware.hdb, detect numerous (over 3000 at present) malware that are not yet detected in stock ClamAV sigs. The current

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-14 Thread upscope
On Wednesday 14 October 2009 12:49:47 am Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: Hello Tom, Tom Shaw wrote: Jose, If you use the unofficial signatures it might help you. See http://www.sanesecurity.co.uk/databases.htm I'll integrate winnow_malware.hdb. Is there a good tutorial somewhere

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-14 Thread Bowie Bailey
upscope wrote: On Wednesday 14 October 2009 12:49:47 am Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: Hello Tom, Tom Shaw wrote: Jose, If you use the unofficial signatures it might help you. See http://www.sanesecurity.co.uk/databases.htm I'll integrate winnow_malware.hdb.

[Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-13 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Hello, I have 49 virus (2 kinds only) received at our mailserver last night which weren't detected by ClamAV, but are detected by most other antivirus available at www.virustotal.com The name of the virus, as detected by Sophos are SophoMal/Bredo-A (detected by 16/41) and Troj/Agent-LKL

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-13 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: I have 49 virus (2 kinds only) ... weren't detected by ClamAV ... surely variants of virus already detected by Clamav. ... As long as this happens near every day since a week ago, it's becoming annoying. Check the

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-13 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
G.W. Haywood wrote: Hi there, Check the documentation on how to add your own signatures. That way, it won't annoy you so much when you have to wait for people, who already have too much work to do, to do some work for you. :) Are you talking by yourself or on behalf of Clamav team ?

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-13 Thread Tom Shaw
At 10:28 AM +0200 10/13/09, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: Hello, I have 49 virus (2 kinds only) received at our mailserver last night which weren't detected by ClamAV, but are detected by most other antivirus available at www.virustotal.com The name of the virus, as detected by Sophos