RE: [Clamav-users] Version 0.87 installed, outdated message claims 0.86.2

2005-09-29 Thread Don Levey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/28/05, Don Levey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And clamd -V reports what? That gives me 0.87, just like the others. I didn't kill (or restart) any of the clam processes when I upgraded, but previous upgrades stopped/started the processes as

Re: [Clamav-users] Version 0.87 installed, outdated message claims 0.86.2

2005-09-29 Thread Bob Hutchinson
On Thursday 29 Sep 2005 12:08, Don Levey wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/28/05, Don Levey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And clamd -V reports what? That gives me 0.87, just like the others. I didn't kill (or restart) any of the clam processes when I upgraded,

RE: [Clamav-users] Version 0.87 installed, outdated message claims 0.86.2

2005-09-29 Thread Don Levey
Bob wrote: On Thursday 29 Sep 2005 12:08, Don Levey wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/28/05, Don Levey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And clamd -V reports what? That gives me 0.87, just like the others. I didn't kill (or restart) any of the clam processes when I

Re: [Clamav-users] Version 0.87 installed, outdated message claims 0.86.2

2005-09-29 Thread Stephen J. Smoogen
On 9/29/05, Don Levey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/28/05, Don Levey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And clamd -V reports what? That gives me 0.87, just like the others. I didn't kill (or restart) any of the clam processes when I

Re: [Clamav-users] Version 0.87 installed, outdated message claims 0.86.2

2005-09-29 Thread Stephen J. Smoogen
On 9/29/05, Don Levey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bob wrote: On Thursday 29 Sep 2005 12:08, Don Levey wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/28/05, Don Levey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And clamd -V reports what? That gives me 0.87, just like the others. I didn't

[Clamav-users] Version 0.87 installed, outdated message claims 0.86.2

2005-09-28 Thread Don Levey
This seems to be a bizarre error, and one I'm not finding in (recent) past correspondence. I'm getting the following error in my daily logwatch report: Last Status: WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! WARNING: Local version: 0.86.2 Recommended version:

RE: [Clamav-users] Version 0.87 installed, outdated message claims 0.86.2

2005-09-28 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
Don Levey wrote: WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! WARNING: Local version: 0.86.2 Recommended version: 0.87 So why am I being told that this is outdated? Any ideas? Have you killed the running clam processes since you upgraded? -- Matthew.van.Eerde (at)

Re: [Clamav-users] Version 0.87 installed, outdated message claims 0.86.2

2005-09-28 Thread Steven Spence
And clamd -V reports what? ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

RE: [Clamav-users] Version 0.87 installed, outdated message claims 0.86.2

2005-09-28 Thread Don Levey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And clamd -V reports what? That gives me 0.87, just like the others. I didn't kill (or restart) any of the clam processes when I upgraded, but previous upgrades stopped/started the processes as part of the installation (I install from RPM). I only see freshclam as a

Re: [Clamav-users] Version 0.87 installed, outdated message claims 0.86.2

2005-09-28 Thread Stephen J. Smoogen
On 9/28/05, Don Levey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And clamd -V reports what? That gives me 0.87, just like the others. I didn't kill (or restart) any of the clam processes when I upgraded, but previous upgrades stopped/started the processes as part of the