RE: [Clamav-users] freshclam: crontab vs. daemon

2004-09-11 Thread Peter Kiem
Hi, 0 * * * * sleep $[ $RANDOM % 1800 ] ; /usr/local/bin/freshclam --quiet I just spent AGES trying to get this to work on some Linux systems. Turns out that unless you escape the % on those systems the crontab entry will fail. This is what is working for me on my Fedora Core 2 systems:

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam: crontab vs. daemon

2004-09-07 Thread Niek
On 9/7/2004 9:28 AM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: Which would give the following behaviour how? | ClamAV update process started at Tue Sep 7 00:01:35 2004 | ClamAV update process started at Tue Sep 7 00:54:56 2004 | ClamAV update process started at Tue Sep 7 01:48:16 2004 | ClamAV update

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam: crontab vs. daemon

2004-09-07 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Niek wrote: On 9/7/2004 9:28 AM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: Which would give the following behaviour how? | ClamAV update process started at Tue Sep 7 07:08:22 2004 | ClamAV update process started at Tue Sep 7 08:01:43 2004 | ClamAV update process started at Tue Sep 7 08:55:03 2004

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam: crontab vs. daemon

2004-09-07 Thread Matt
Ralph Angenendt wrote: Niek wrote: On 9/7/2004 9:28 AM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: Which would give the following behaviour how? | ClamAV update process started at Tue Sep 7 07:08:22 2004 | ClamAV update process started at Tue Sep 7 08:01:43 2004 | ClamAV update process

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam: crontab vs. daemon

2004-09-07 Thread Bill Randle
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 04:19, Matt wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote: Niek wrote: On 9/7/2004 9:28 AM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: Which would give the following behaviour how? | ClamAV update process started at Tue Sep 7 07:08:22 2004 | ClamAV update process started at Tue

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam: crontab vs. daemon

2004-09-07 Thread Mister Coffee
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 07:35:26AM -0700, Bill Randle wrote: large snipping 0 * * * * sleep $[ $RANDOM % 1800 ] ; /usr/local/bin/freshclam --quiet this causes it to sleep for a random period of time not exceeding 30 min before executing. Rob Matt Slightly

[Clamav-users] freshclam: crontab vs. daemon

2004-09-06 Thread Daniel S. Cohen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I am wondering if there is any advantage of running freshclam as a daemon as oppposed to running it from the crontab a few times day? Thanks. Dan - -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam: crontab vs. daemon

2004-09-06 Thread Thomas Lamy
Daniel S. Cohen wrote: Hello, I am wondering if there is any advantage of running freshclam as a daemon as oppposed to running it from the crontab a few times day? Thanks. Dan It's a matter of taste. I prefer running it in daemon mode, as freshclam is rock solid (eg. it hasn't crashed here for

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam: crontab vs. daemon

2004-09-06 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Monday 06 September 2004 01:25 pm, Thomas Lamy wrote: It's a matter of taste. I prefer running it in daemon mode, as freshclam is rock solid (eg. it hasn't crashed here for months), and due to it's random start time does not tend to overload the mirrors. You have to use bashisms or perl (or

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam: crontab vs. daemon

2004-09-06 Thread Stephen Gran
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 02:16:48PM -0500, Jeff Smelser said: On Monday 06 September 2004 01:25 pm, Thomas Lamy wrote: It's a matter of taste. I prefer running it in daemon mode, as freshclam is rock solid (eg. it hasn't crashed here for months), and due to it's random start time does not