On Thu, 2021-09-23 at 07:36 -0400, Maarten Broekman via clamav-users
wrote:
> To further Ged's point, these signatures that are hitting are extended
> logical signatures. Phishing signatures have a very specific format
> that are either solely looking at hostnames, host prefixes, link
>
uot;Joel Esler (jesler)" <
> jes...@cisco.com> wrote:
> >> On Sep 22, 2021, at 22:04, Jim Popovitch via clamav-users <
> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> ClamAV is not respecting Phishing* settings.
> >>>
> >>
On Thu, 2021-09-23 at 09:28 +0100, G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote:
>
> Why do you not want ClamAV to alert you to (what appear to me to be)
> obvious scam emails?
Because I have chosen to disable the Phishing* checks, per the ClamAV
documentation, and apparently that isn't happening. I
Hi there,
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, Jim Popovitch via clamav-users wrote:
On September 23, 2021 3:29:02 AM UTC, "Joel Esler (jesler)"
wrote:
On Sep 22, 2021, at 22:04, Jim Popovitch via clamav-users
wrote:
ClamAV is not respecting Phishing* settings.
clamd.conf:
...
Phishing
v-users
>> wrote:
>>
>> ClamAV is not respecting Phishing* settings.
>>
>> clamd.conf:
>> ...
>> PhishingSignatures false
>> PhishingScanURLs false
>>
>>
>> Sep 20 15:32:35 mx1 postfix/cleanup[9328]: 4HCpSy4
I am sure someone will respond about your particular issue, but are you saying
they are false positives?
—
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 22, 2021, at 22:04, Jim Popovitch via clamav-users
> wrote:
>
> ClamAV is not respecting Phishing* settings.
>
ClamAV is not respecting Phishing* settings.
clamd.conf:
...
PhishingSignatures false
PhishingScanURLs false
Sep 20 15:32:35 mx1 postfix/cleanup[9328]: 4HCpSy4JbTzCqpv: milter-
reject: END-OF-MESSAGE from unknown[103.195.186.145]: 5.7.1 Message
infected with
