On 2/27/14, 3:43:08PM, Paul Kosinski wrote:
The blog post concerning OpenSSL being required for ClamAV only has
one reason as to why it might *benefit* ClamAV, the other reasons are
why OpenSSL *itself* in good.
That single reason is:
"We will be able to provide a better freshclam experience
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 18:43 -0500, Paul Kosinski wrote:
> The blog post concerning OpenSSL being required for ClamAV only has
> one reason as to why it might *benefit* ClamAV, the other reasons are
> why OpenSSL *itself* in good.
>
> That single reason is:
>
> "We will be able to provide a bett
The blog post concerning OpenSSL being required for ClamAV only has
one reason as to why it might *benefit* ClamAV, the other reasons are
why OpenSSL *itself* in good.
That single reason is:
"We will be able to provide a better freshclam experience in a
future release."
What exactly does thi
