Re: [Clamav-users] News about 0.95

2009-03-31 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: What I've meant is, can it (instruct sendmail to) reject mail only viruses, not phishing nor unsafe pages, or do I need two instances of clamd for this? On 30.03.09 14:40, aCaB wrote: Hi Matus, If you are using clamd for different purposes as well as for

Re: [Clamav-users] News about 0.95

2009-03-31 Thread aCaB
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Hmm, there could be an option for not rejecting signatures like *.Phishing.* or Safebrowsing.* Hi, If you want to fine tune detection based on malware names you can either do the tuning in clamd (as explained above) or use OnInfected=Accept and AddHeader=Yes and

Re: [Clamav-users] News about 0.95

2009-03-31 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Hmm, there could be an option for not rejecting signatures like *.Phishing.* or Safebrowsing.* On 31.03.09 11:46, aCaB wrote: If you want to fine tune detection based on malware names you can either do the tuning in clamd (as explained above) or use

Re: [Clamav-users] News about 0.95

2009-03-31 Thread McDonald, Dan
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 12:11 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Hmm, there could be an option for not rejecting signatures like *.Phishing.* or Safebrowsing.* On 31.03.09 11:46, aCaB wrote: If you want to fine tune detection based on malware names you

Re: [Clamav-users] News about 0.95

2009-03-30 Thread aCaB
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: What I've meant is, can it (instruct sendmail to) reject mail only viruses, not phishing nor unsafe pages, or do I need two instances of clamd for this? Hi Matus, If you are using clamd for different purposes as well as for serving the milters and if you require

Re: [Clamav-users] News about 0.95

2009-03-28 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: You can then filter based on the virusname, if you want to treat phishing/safebrowsing-blacklisted entries as spam. Yes, that wil be important. Does clamav-milter support this for now? On 24.03.09 15:46, aCaB wrote: clamav-milter has been nerfed and it now

Re: [Clamav-users] News about 0.95

2009-03-24 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:56:22 + Ian Eiloart i...@sussex.ac.uk wrote: That sounds good. What does it do, though? My guess is that it enables freshclam to download copies of files containing URLs that Google considers unsafe, and then clamd will block emails that contain those URLs. Is

Re: [Clamav-users] News about 0.95

2009-03-24 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-03-24 13:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:56:22 + Ian Eiloart i...@sussex.ac.uk wrote: That sounds good. What does it do, though? My guess is that it enables freshclam to download copies of files containing URLs that Google considers unsafe, and then

Re: [Clamav-users] News about 0.95

2009-03-24 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:56:22 + Ian Eiloart i...@sussex.ac.uk wrote: That sounds good. What does it do, though? My guess is that it enables freshclam to download copies of files containing URLs that Google considers unsafe, and then clamd will block emails that contain those URLs.

Re: [Clamav-users] News about 0.95

2009-03-24 Thread aCaB
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: You can then filter based on the virusname, if you want to treat phishing/safebrowsing-blacklisted entries as spam. Yes, that wil be important. Does clamav-milter support this for now? Hi, clamav-milter has been nerfed and it now relies on clamd. All you have

Re: [Clamav-users] News about 0.95

2009-03-12 Thread Henrik K
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 05:07:19PM +, Nigel Horne wrote: Folks, I am pleased to let you know of a major new feature to be added to ClamAV. 0.95RC2 will be released next Monday, 16/3/09, which will include support for Google Safe Browsing. Have you tried this with live servers? Can you

Re: [Clamav-users] News about 0.95

2009-03-12 Thread Steve Basford
The safebrowsing.cvd will be distributed under Google's terms and license. Therefore, before enabling SafeBrowsing in freshclam.conf one should check that he's OK with that license. We'll provide all necessary information and links to make it easy to find out. Hi, Just a quick question:

Re: [Clamav-users] News about 0.95

2009-03-12 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-03-12 10:41, Steve Basford wrote: The safebrowsing.cvd will be distributed under Google's terms and license. Therefore, before enabling SafeBrowsing in freshclam.conf one should check that he's OK with that license. We'll provide all necessary information and links to make it easy to

Re: [Clamav-users] News about 0.95

2009-03-12 Thread Dennis Peterson
Török Edwin wrote: On 2009-03-12 00:05, Dennis Peterson wrote: Is such a list now available to explore for gotcha's that need to be whitelisted? The list contains only hashes, so you can lookup URLs, but not browse them. No thanks, then. That would be too full of surprised. dp

Re: [Clamav-users] News about 0.95

2009-03-11 Thread Ian Eiloart
--On 11 March 2009 17:07:19 + Nigel Horne n...@bandsman.co.uk wrote: Folks, I am pleased to let you know of a major new feature to be added to ClamAV. 0.95RC2 will be released next Monday, 16/3/09, which will include support for Google Safe Browsing. That sounds good. What does it do,

Re: [Clamav-users] News about 0.95

2009-03-11 Thread Spiro Harvey
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:56:22 + Ian Eiloart i...@sussex.ac.uk wrote: That sounds good. What does it do, though? My guess is that it enables freshclam to download copies of files containing URLs that Google considers unsafe, and then clamd will block emails that contain those URLs. Is that

Re: [Clamav-users] News about 0.95

2009-03-11 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Nigel Horne wrote: Folks, Hi Folk, I am pleased to let you know of a major new feature to be added to ClamAV. 0.95RC2 will be released next Monday, 16/3/09, which will include support for Google Safe Browsing. Some questions : * if I understood, freshclam will get the complete list of

Re: [Clamav-users] News about 0.95

2009-03-11 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:06:19 +0100 Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz jose-marcio.mart...@ensmp.fr wrote: * if I understood, freshclam will get the complete list of URLs from Google. The computer running clamav/clamd/... will get this list from clamav (as a signature) not from Google. Right ?

Re: [Clamav-users] News about 0.95

2009-03-11 Thread Dennis Peterson
Tomasz Kojm wrote: On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:06:19 +0100 Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz jose-marcio.mart...@ensmp.fr wrote: * if I understood, freshclam will get the complete list of URLs from Google. The computer running clamav/clamd/... will get this list from clamav (as a signature) not from