Hi Odhiambo,
That is the problem.. NOTHING at all...
Before 16 august I saw a couple error message that it can't connect to the
server. But after that the connection was restored and the signature is
updated. After 16 August nothing is logged in the file. Seem that tha daemon
stops with periodic
Casper Gasper wrote:
Thanks to everyone for the help. Just to follow up, the problem was
actually a hardware fault. The hard drive is flaky, but the box is so
lightly loaded the weekly clamscan was the only thing that thrashed
the disk. Testing with:
dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null
crashes the
Basically I want to continue on with what some of the people on this list
were saying about using tripwire (or something similar) to just scan files
on a system that have changed. I wouldn't want to call clamscan multiple
times each with one file, but rather call it once with a big list of files
mcd wrote:
Basically I want to continue on with what some of the people on this
list were saying about using tripwire (or something similar) to just
scan files on a system that have changed. I wouldn't want to call
clamscan multiple times each with one file, but rather call it once
with a big
find (options) | xargs clamscan
So to search all files in home
find /home/ |xargs clamscan
Or to scan only certain files of specified size (thanks to Noel Jones for
this one)
find / -type f -size N | xargs clamscan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mcd wrote:
Basically I want to continue on with what some of the people on this list
were saying about using tripwire (or something similar) to just scan files
on a system that have changed. I wouldn't want to call clamscan multiple
times each with one file, but rather call it once with a big
Or if you maintain a file with the filenames and paths that you want to
scan, you can use cat to output each line of that file to clamscan in the
same fashion.
cat filename | xargs clamscan
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
mcd wrote:
Basically I want to continue on with what some of the people on this list
were saying about using tripwire (or something similar) to just scan files
on a system that have changed. I wouldn't want to call clamscan multiple
times each with one file, but rather call it once with a big
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, mcd wrote:
Basically I want to continue on with what some of the people on this list
were saying about using tripwire (or something similar) to just scan files
on a system that have changed. I wouldn't want to call clamscan multiple
times each with one file, but rather
This is an interesting approach, but let me explain a little more. I will be
running md5sums for every file on a system. I will then compare that list of
md5sums against a list of md5sums that are know to be virus free. The files
that do not have valid md5sums in the database will then need to be
mcd wrote:
This is an interesting approach, but let me explain a little more. I
will be
running md5sums for every file on a system. I will then compare that
list of
md5sums against a list of md5sums that are know to be virus free. The files
that do not have valid md5sums in the database will
mcd wrote:
On 9/8/06, Barry Gill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cat filename | xargs clamscan
This is an interesting approach, but let me explain a little more. I
will be running md5sums for every file on a system. I will then
compare that list of md5sums against a list of md5sums that are
On Fri, September 8, 2006 10:42 am, mcd said:
This is an interesting approach, but let me explain a little more. I will
be running md5sums for every file on a system. I will then compare that
list of md5sums against a list of md5sums that are know to be virus free.
The files that do not have
At 09:42 AM 9/8/2006, mcd wrote:
This is an interesting approach, but let me explain a
little more. I will be
running md5sums for every file on a system. I will then
compare that list of
md5sums against a list of md5sums that are know to be
virus free. The files
that do not have valid md5sums
Noel Jones wrote:
At 09:42 AM 9/8/2006, mcd wrote:
This is an interesting approach, but let me explain a little more. I
will be
running md5sums for every file on a system. I will then compare that
list of
md5sums against a list of md5sums that are know to be virus free. The
files
that do not
At 10:11 AM 9/8/2006, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
cat big.list.of.files | xargs clamscan
xargs is still limited by max line length, so this needs
to be done with care. Perl can also be used in place of
clamdscan to feed file names to clamd (which must be run
as root). The
xargs is still limited by max line length, so this needs to be done
with care. Perl can also be used in place of clamdscan to feed file
names to clamd (which must be run as root). The advantage of Perl is it
can iterate over an array and of course manage all the logging.
Also, depending on how
On 08/09/06, Dennis Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Casper Gasper wrote:
Thanks to everyone for the help. Just to follow up, the problem was
actually a hardware fault. The hard drive is flaky, but the box is so
lightly loaded the weekly clamscan was the only thing that thrashed
the disk.
At 10:11 AM 9/8/2006, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
cat big.list.of.files | xargs clamscan
xargs is still limited by max line length, so this needs
to be done with care. Perl can also be used in place of
clamdscan to feed file names to clamd (which must be run
as root).
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:05:48AM -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Hopefully the list is also properly escaped and or quoted. xargs is pretty
unhappy with filenames that have special characters in them, or spaces. This
is
true no matter how the list is submitted to the scanner. This is the
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:05:48AM -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Hopefully the list is also properly escaped and or quoted. xargs is pretty
unhappy with filenames that have special characters in them, or spaces.
This is
true no matter how the list is submitted to the scanner. This is
On Sep 8, 2006, at 11:34 AM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:05:48AM -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Hopefully the list is also properly escaped and or quoted. xargs
is pretty
unhappy with filenames that have special characters in them, or
spaces. This is
true no matter
On 9/8/06, Philip Ershler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 8, 2006, at 11:34 AM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:05:48AM -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Hopefully the list is also properly escaped and or quoted. xargs
is pretty
unhappy with filenames that have special
On Sep 8, 2006, at 10:34 AM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Henrik Krohns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats why we have: find -print0 | xargs -0
Assumes Linux?
No. This -print0 option first appeared in GNU find before Linux
existed, as far as I can tell.
It was adopted into BSD versions of find
On Sep 8, 2006, at 11:25 AM, mcd wrote:
Sorry this is on a windows system. Can I just cat the file list
and pipe
it to the windows version of clamscan? I believe it takes stdin?
The problem is that clamscan wants the files or directories passed to
it via the command line, not via
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 8, 2006, at 11:25 AM, mcd wrote:
Sorry this is on a windows system. Can I just cat the file list and
pipe
it to the windows version of clamscan? I believe it takes stdin?
The problem is that clamscan wants the
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Scott Moseman wrote:
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 22:31:43 -0500
From: Scott Moseman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Subject: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter will not create socket file
I have searched
On Sep 8, 2006, at 10:34 AM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Henrik Krohns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats why we have: find -print0 | xargs -0
Assumes Linux?
No. This -print0 option first appeared in GNU find before Linux
existed, as far as I can tell.
It was adopted into BSD versions of
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Seems not to work in Solaris.
As a Solaris fan -- you REALLY want to install gnu find, and grep, and
fileutils. At least.
Sun still for whatever reason doesn't support many newer options, newer
being post 1989.
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Seems not to work in Solaris.
As a Solaris fan -- you REALLY want to install gnu find, and grep, and
fileutils. At least.
Sun still for whatever reason doesn't support many newer options, newer
being post 1989.
You can't imagine the
On Sep 8, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
No. This -print0 option first appeared in GNU find before Linux
existed, as far as I can tell.
It was adopted into BSD versions of find around 1993 to 1995:
Seems not to work in Solaris.
Agreed-- Solaris and AIX are the two platforms I
The problem is that clamscan wants the files or directories passed to
it via the command line, not via stdin-- besides which, Windows has a
fairly limited max length for the command line.
Actually it's not that limited (but still too limited for this purpose I
guess). Windows XP/2k3 has a
the following installed and running well gmp-4.1.4.tar.gz
Does that mean I can come out from under my rock now?
LOL...Dennis, let me apologize, I should have not hit the SEND key so
quickly here. Its just lately I see so much of the can't/don't bother
me type responses in so many of the lists
33 matches
Mail list logo
