[Clamav-users] Autoreply to clamav-users Digest, Vol 70, Issue 17
ZECCHINI MARCO - Messaggio automatico / Automatic reply Sono assente fino al 2 AGOSTO 2010, sarà mia premura rispondere alla vostra e-mail al mio ritorno. Cordiali saluti Marco Zecchini EUROGROUP S.p.A. Sito internet http://www.eurogroup.com Tel. 0422 / 4647 - Fax 0422 / 460040 EUROGROUP S.P.A. Sede in Via Treviso, n. 66 - 31057 SILEA (TV) Capitale sociale Euro 2.064.000,00 i.v. Codice fiscale e Partita I.V.A. 00030280267 Iscritta al Registro Imprese di Treviso al n. 00030280267 Iscritta al R.E.A. al n. 88700 *** I dati contenuti nella presente mail e in ognuno dei suoi allegati sono strettamente riservati e confidenziali e di uso esclusivo dei loro destinatari. In caso di ricezione per errore, ogni divulgazione, riproduzione, distribuzione o uso degli stessi è assolutamente proibita. *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be privileged and confidential and intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. If you are not the addressee any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. Messaggio originale / Original message Da / From: clamav-users-requ...@lists.clamav.net A / To:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Data / Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:00:29 +0200 Oggetto / Subject: clamav-users Digest, Vol 70, Issue 17 ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
[Clamav-users] Feedback on clamav + sanesecurity experience
Hi Everyone, We are currently using clamav (0.96.1), spamassassin (3.3.1), greylisting (4.2.5) and sendmail (8.14.4) on our mailserver's cluster (OS : freeBSD 8.0) at the University of Strasbourg. This antispam and antivirus solution was quiet sure until last month. We've been having intensive phishing's issues for one month and we are considering using sanesecurity'signatures to improve the situation. We would appreciate any feedback on your experience using clamav with sanesecurity. Thank's in advance. Regards. Laurence Moindrot -- University of Strasbourg IT Service ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [Clamav-users] Feedback on clamav + sanesecurity experience
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:35:49 +0200 Laurence MOINDROT moind...@unistra.fr articulated: Hi Everyone, We are currently using clamav (0.96.1), spamassassin (3.3.1), greylisting (4.2.5) and sendmail (8.14.4) on our mailserver's cluster (OS : freeBSD 8.0) at the University of Strasbourg. This antispam and antivirus solution was quiet sure until last month. We've been having intensive phishing's issues for one month and we are considering using sanesecurity'signatures to improve the situation. We would appreciate any feedback on your experience using clamav with sanesecurity. Using the signatures provided by Sanesecurity would greatly enhance your AV/AS environment. There are scripts that automate the downloading and installation of these signature files also available on the Sanesecurity site. If you need further information feel free to contact me. -- Jerry clamav.u...@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __ I kind of want to slay the dragon. Let's go to work. Angel's final words. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [Clamav-users] Feedback on clamav + sanesecurity experience
Laurence, Just a thought. Do you have any rbl listing(s) in your sendmail.mc file hardcoded? This has helped us out lots,in addition to clamav and spamassassin,of course. If not I can email you on how to setup or google on how to accomplish this. Take Care, Barry On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 20:35 +0200, Laurence MOINDROT wrote: Hi Everyone, We are currently using clamav (0.96.1), spamassassin (3.3.1), greylisting (4.2.5) and sendmail (8.14.4) on our mailserver's cluster (OS : freeBSD 8.0) at the University of Strasbourg. This antispam and antivirus solution was quiet sure until last month. We've been having intensive phishing's issues for one month and we are considering using sanesecurity'signatures to improve the situation. We would appreciate any feedback on your experience using clamav with sanesecurity. Thank's in advance. Regards. Laurence Moindrot -- University of Strasbourg IT Service ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [Clamav-users] Feedback on clamav + sanesecurity experience
On 7/20/2010 1:35 PM, Laurence MOINDROT wrote: Hi Everyone, We are currently using clamav (0.96.1), spamassassin (3.3.1), greylisting (4.2.5) and sendmail (8.14.4) on our mailserver's cluster (OS : freeBSD 8.0) at the University of Strasbourg. This antispam and antivirus solution was quiet sure until last month. We've been having intensive phishing's issues for one month and we are considering using sanesecurity'signatures to improve the situation. We would appreciate any feedback on your experience using clamav with sanesecurity. I've been using the sanesecurity lists since shortly after they became publicly available. I've found them to be safe and very effective. -- Noel Jones ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [Clamav-users] Feedback on clamav + sanesecurity experience
Barry, Just a thought. Do you have any rbl listing(s) in your sendmail.mc file hardcoded? We didn't use this option yet. This has helped us out lots,in addition to clamav and spamassassin,of course. If not I can email you on how to setup or google on how to accomplish this. Thanks, that will be helpfull. Best regards, Laurence Take Care, Barry On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 20:35 +0200, Laurence MOINDROT wrote: Hi Everyone, We are currently using clamav (0.96.1), spamassassin (3.3.1), greylisting (4.2.5) and sendmail (8.14.4) on our mailserver's cluster (OS : freeBSD 8.0) at the University of Strasbourg. This antispam and antivirus solution was quiet sure until last month. We've been having intensive phishing's issues for one month and we are considering using sanesecurity'signatures to improve the situation. We would appreciate any feedback on your experience using clamav with sanesecurity. Thank's in advance. Regards. Laurence Moindrot -- University of Strasbourg IT Service ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [Clamav-users] Feedback on clamav + sanesecurity experience
Hi Everyone, We are currently using clamav (0.96.1), spamassassin (3.3.1), greylisting (4.2.5) and sendmail (8.14.4) on our mailserver's cluster (OS : freeBSD 8.0) at the University of Strasbourg. This antispam and antivirus solution was quiet sure until last month. We've been having intensive phishing's issues for one month and we are considering using sanesecurity'signatures to improve the situation. We would appreciate any feedback on your experience using clamav with sanesecurity. Using the signatures provided by Sanesecurity would greatly enhance your AV/AS environment. There are scripts that automate the downloading and installation of these signature files also available on the Sanesecurity site. If you need further information feel free to contact me. I will setup a test plateform and I'll let you know how it goes. Thanks Laurence ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [Clamav-users] Feedback on clamav + sanesecurity experience
Checked out GreyListing and Sanesecurity. Both look like really cool tools. However, we have been using SpamAssassin, ClamAV, with sendmail (Fedora Core 8), and zan.spamhaus.org RBL, which does most of the heavy work, of blocking incoming SPAM. I prefer this method since it is not at all resource intensive (it doesn't really need to parse the header or body, doing so only after the RBL oks the IP). With Graylisting, and sanesecurity, you would be doing a lot of processing that the RBL (should) already be blocking. So I would definitely implement RBL first (if not already there), before trying out the others. Again they are fantastic tools, if needed, but how much processor power are you going to through at every email, vs. the rare occasion that a SPAM email may get through before the RBL is updated? Shawn Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:54:55 +0200 From: moind...@unistra.fr To: clamav.u...@seibercom.net CC: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Feedback on clamav + sanesecurity experience Hi Everyone, We are currently using clamav (0.96.1), spamassassin (3.3.1), greylisting (4.2.5) and sendmail (8.14.4) on our mailserver's cluster (OS : freeBSD 8.0) at the University of Strasbourg. This antispam and antivirus solution was quiet sure until last month. We've been having intensive phishing's issues for one month and we are considering using sanesecurity'signatures to improve the situation. We would appreciate any feedback on your experience using clamav with sanesecurity. Using the signatures provided by Sanesecurity would greatly enhance your AV/AS environment. There are scripts that automate the downloading and installation of these signature files also available on the Sanesecurity site. If you need further information feel free to contact me. I will setup a test plateform and I'll let you know how it goes. Thanks Laurence ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml _ Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2 ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [Clamav-users] Feedback on clamav + sanesecurity experience
On 7/20/10 6:12 PM, Shawn Bakhtiar shashan...@hotmail.com wrote: Checked out GreyListing and Sanesecurity. Both look like really cool tools. With Graylisting, and sanesecurity, you would be doing a lot of processing that the RBL (should) already be blocking. So I would definitely implement RBL first (if not already there), before trying out the others. Greylisting is very resource light. It's done before the data stanza in smtp, so it cuts down on the over traffic flow in addition to processing (no need to check RBLs or parse the message before deciding to delay the message). Greylisting got rid of 80% of my spam, most of which was caught by spamassassin anyway, but that's 80% I didn't have to run through spamassassin before discarding. -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281 Again they are fantastic tools, if needed, but how much processor power are you going to through at every email, vs. the rare occasion that a SPAM email may get through before the RBL is updated? Shawn Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:54:55 +0200 From: moind...@unistra.fr To: clamav.u...@seibercom.net CC: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Feedback on clamav + sanesecurity experience Hi Everyone, We are currently using clamav (0.96.1), spamassassin (3.3.1), greylisting (4.2.5) and sendmail (8.14.4) on our mailserver's cluster (OS : freeBSD 8.0) at the University of Strasbourg. This antispam and antivirus solution was quiet sure until last month. We've been having intensive phishing's issues for one month and we are considering using sanesecurity'signatures to improve the situation. We would appreciate any feedback on your experience using clamav with sanesecurity. Using the signatures provided by Sanesecurity would greatly enhance your AV/AS environment. There are scripts that automate the downloading and installation of these signature files also available on the Sanesecurity site. If you need further information feel free to contact me. I will setup a test plateform and I'll let you know how it goes. Thanks Laurence ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml _ Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL: en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2 ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
