Am 27.09.18 um 11:04 schrieb Arnaud Jacques:
>> I then restarted the milter. Unfortunately, the email is still marked as
>> Spam. I thought that clamav-milter would simply ignore the file.
>>
>> X-Virus-Status: Infected (SecuriteInfo.com.Spam-4701.UNOFFICIAL)
>
> You can whitelist the signature
Am 27.09.18 um 01:53 schrieb Ted Hatfield:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 27.09.18 um 00:34 schrieb Ted Hatfield:
>>> None of these says anything about what headers are added to the message.
>>>
>>> X-Virus-Status: and X-Virus-Scanned: may be added to all of the messages
>>>
Am 27.09.18 um 00:34 schrieb Ted Hatfield:
> None of these says anything about what headers are added to the message.
>
> X-Virus-Status: and X-Virus-Scanned: may be added to all of the messages
> regardless of how the milter is configured
no
the whole purpose of this header is to signal if t
Hi Paul,
Thanks for the update.
I am interested to know how freshclam in ClamAV 0.100.2 performs for you. I
have made some tweaks to make it ignore mirrors for less time, but more
importantly I implemented a change to have it report "up to date" in the event
that the signature version provide
@sanesecurity:
News: Sanesecurity.Rogue.0hr.20181004-1536 is causing FPs.
Fixed but reload signatures ASAP
Will investigate what went wrong.
Cheers,
Steve
Twitter: @sanesecurity
___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http
At Joel's suggestion, i have changed our sampling rate looking for ClamAV cvd
updates from 15 minutes down to 1 minute. This gives a more precise
measurement of how long it takes for the cvd file(s) to actually become
available from Cloudflare after its presence is "advertised" by the CNS TXT
Oh no. Not that kind of “significant change”. We have several ideas, but we
want 1.0 to be a shift in functionality and user experience, not just
incremental additions and functionality.
Sent from my iPad
> On Oct 4, 2018, at 1:15 PM, Paul Kosinski wrote:
>
> I hope it won't be in the style
I hope it won't be in the style of Mozilla's "significant change" to
Firefox, which has just about destroyed it (IMHO, anyway).
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 07:00:00 +
"Joel Esler (jesler)" wrote:
> :)
>
> We have some thoughts around 1.0. We want it to be a significant
> change, not just an increme
:)
We have some thoughts around 1.0. We want it to be a significant change, not
just an incremental improvement.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 3, 2018, at 23:48, Dennis Peterson
mailto:denni...@inetnw.com>> wrote:
On 10/3/18 10:37 AM, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote:
https://blog.clamav.net/2018/10/cl
