Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam logs nonsens

2003-11-11 Thread Odhiambo Washington
* Kritof Petr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003 11:14]: wrote: Hi, I assume the database.clamav.net site doesnt have IP address 192.168.100.1. It is IP address of my proxy server. Look at logfile below. This logfile is clean ;-) Anyway, my update log file has nothing like that. Are you connecting

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam logs nonsens

2003-11-11 Thread Kritof Petr
Odhiambo Washington wrote: * Kritof Petr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003 11:14]: wrote: Hi, I assume the database.clamav.net site doesnt have IP address 192.168.100.1. It is IP address of my proxy server. Look at logfile below. This logfile is clean ;-) Anyway, my update log file has

[Clamav-users] Digital Signatures warning

2003-11-11 Thread Support ePaxsys/FRWS
Greetings folks! Been reading my clam-update.log (since previous posts raised my curiousity) and noticed: SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES A quick run through the docs, and a couple grep's on the source tree show nothing I should look for with the build. The ./configure

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam logs nonsens

2003-11-11 Thread Odhiambo Washington
* Kritof Petr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003 18:29]: wrote: Odhiambo Washington wrote: * Kritof Petr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003 11:14]: wrote: Hi, I assume the database.clamav.net site doesnt have IP address 192.168.100.1. It is IP address of my proxy server. Look at logfile below

Re: [Clamav-users] Digital Signatures warning

2003-11-11 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Flinn Mueller wrote: You are missing GMP, install then rebuild with support for it. If anyone is trying to do this on Solaris -- GMP will build as a 64 bit library. Unless you can figure out how to get GMP to make a 32 bit library, you'll need to add -m64 to your CFLAGS

[Clamav-users] clamav freebsd port problems

2003-11-11 Thread Ken McKittrick
Hello I've updated 2 of my servers to use the latest FreeBSD port of clamav 0.60_4. Clamscan works fine. However fresclam fails with permission denied errors and clamdscan doesn't see to work at all. The FreeBSD port uses the user clamav. I changed this to use vscan to work better with

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: clamav-devel-20031106 fails to compile with --enable-milter

2003-11-11 Thread Steve King
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 2:24 pm, Nigel Horne wrote: On Sunday 09 November 2003 4:32 pm, Steve King wrote: It is linux Suse 7.3. I didn't have sendmail-devel, so I tried installing sendmail-devel-8.11.6 from rpm. The 3 files it gives me I seem to have had anyway in sendmail (mfapi.h,

[Clamav-users] New stable release

2003-11-11 Thread Tomasz Kojm
Well, this is an unofficial information but here it is: http://clamav.net/snapshot/clamav-0.65.tar.gz Best regards, Tomasz Kojm -- oo. http://www.clamav.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg (\/)\. 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B \..._ Wed Nov

[Clamav-users] RE: MiMail.C virus. {Virus Engine Scanned}

2003-11-11 Thread mail-admin
Dear all, wondering how come CLAMAV detected virus, but still did not notify me. i sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but it seem detected. but did not block/delete/remove the virus, and did not notifcy as what it used to does. please advice, good day, Nov 12 12:32:24 ns12

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: clamav-devel-20031106 fails to compile with --enable-milter

2003-11-11 Thread Nigel Horne
On Wednesday 12 Nov 2003 3:57 am, Steve King wrote: Before rerunning configure did you make distclean? This happens with new snapshots, including today's. For the past while,I've been trying configure --enable-milter first, getting the error in the make, then doing make clean and doing

Re: [Clamav-users] RE: MiMail.C virus. {Virus Engine Scanned}

2003-11-11 Thread Odhiambo Washington
* mail-admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20031112 07:55]: wrote: Dear all, wondering how come CLAMAV detected virus, but still did not notify me. Are you supposed to be notied by Clamav or by MailScanner? i sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but it seem detected. but did not