[Clamav-users] clamav-0.80rc4 fails to build on x86_64

2004-10-17 Thread Thomas Cameron
Howdy all - I am not a programmer so please bear with me. I just tried to build clamav-0.80rc4 (--sysconfdir=/etc --prefix=/usr -- enable-milter) on an Athlon64 (x86_64) and I end up with this: gcc -O2 -g -o freshclam output.o cfgparser.o getopt.o memory.o misc.o freshclam.o options.o manager.o

[Clamav-users] libbz2 and libgmp not found on x86_64 with rc3

2004-10-17 Thread Thomas Cameron
All - Please bear with me, I am not a programmer so this might be something silly I don't know about. Compiling rc3 (--sysconfdir=/etc --prefix=/usr --enable-milter) and I get the following errors: *** Warning: linker path does not have real file for library -lbz2. *** I have the capability to

[Clamav-users] SOLVED - libbz2 and libgmp not found on x86_64 with rc3

2004-10-17 Thread Thomas Cameron
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 02:24 -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote: All - Please bear with me, I am not a programmer so this might be something silly I don't know about. Compiling rc3 (--sysconfdir=/etc --prefix=/usr --enable-milter) and I get the following errors: *** Warning: linker path does

Re: [Clamav-users] libbz2 and libgmp not found on x86_64 with rc3

2004-10-17 Thread Bill Maidment
Thomas Cameron wrote: All - Please bear with me, I am not a programmer so this might be something silly I don't know about. Programmers do silly things as well :-) Try rc4. It's working for me on a dual Opteron. Cheers -- _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/

Re: [Clamav-users] libbz2 and libgmp not found on x86_64 with rc3

2004-10-17 Thread Thomas Cameron
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 17:41 +1000, Bill Maidment wrote: Thomas Cameron wrote: All - Please bear with me, I am not a programmer so this might be something silly I don't know about. Programmers do silly things as well :-) Try rc4. It's working for me on a dual Opteron. See my

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-0.80rc4 fails to build on x86_64

2004-10-17 Thread Thomas Cameron
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 02:12 -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote: Howdy all - I am not a programmer so please bear with me. I just tried to build clamav-0.80rc4 (--sysconfdir=/etc --prefix=/usr -- enable-milter) on an Athlon64 (x86_64) and I end up with this: gcc -O2 -g -o freshclam output.o

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-0.80rc4 fails to build on x86_64

2004-10-17 Thread Bill Maidment
Thomas Cameron wrote: On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 02:12 -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote: Sorry should have mentioned - this is on a Fedora Core 2 box with all updates applied as of today. RC3 builds just fine on this box. It's an AMD64. uname -a gives: Linux strongbox.example.com 2.6.8-1.521 #1 Mon Aug

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-0.80rc4 fails to build on x86_64

2004-10-17 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 03:18:11 -0500 Thomas Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 02:12 -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote: Howdy all - I am not a programmer so please bear with me. I just tried to build clamav-0.80rc4 (--sysconfdir=/etc --prefix=/usr -- enable-milter) on

[Clamav-users] GDI+ bug exploit Mutations

2004-10-17 Thread Steve Basford
Hi, Can someone test ClamAV with these files: http://www.hiddenbit.org/demo_files/jpeg.zip Source: http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-October/027530.html Cheers, Steve ___

Re: [Clamav-users] GDI+ bug exploit Mutations

2004-10-17 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004, Steve Basford wrote: Hi, Can someone test ClamAV with these files: http://www.hiddenbit.org/demo_files/jpeg.zip [westnet]:~$ clamdscan - jpeg.zip stream: OK --- SCAN SUMMARY --- Infected files: 0 Time: 0.113 sec (0 m 0 s) Running 20041017 snap

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-0.80rc4 fails to build on x86_64

2004-10-17 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 02:12:13 -0500 Thomas Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howdy all - I am not a programmer so please bear with me. I just tried to build clamav-0.80rc4 (--sysconfdir=/etc --prefix=/usr -- enable-milter) on an Athlon64 (x86_64) and I end up with this: gcc -O2 -g -o

Re: [Clamav-users] daily.cvd and main.cvd

2004-10-17 Thread Stephen Gran
On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 09:51:53AM -0400, D Walsh said: While I am very happy with clamav, I see room for expansion and potential in a limited global environment. Is it possible to have clamd on other servers utilize the db files on a dedicated server in a local network? I think that it

Re: [Clamav-users] GDI+ bug exploit Mutations

2004-10-17 Thread Vernon A. Fort
Vernon A. Fort wrote: Steve Basford wrote: Hi, Can someone test ClamAV with these files: http://www.hiddenbit.org/demo_files/jpeg.zip Source: http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-October/027530.html Cheers, Steve ___

RE: [Clamav-users] GDI+ bug exploit Mutations

2004-10-17 Thread sk3tch
Tested with McAfee uvscan, Avgscan, clamscan. Only uvscan detected a virus Found the Exploit-MS04-028 trojan !!! I also have sophos but not currently installed. I tested both on the uncompress zip and uncompressed. Again, only McAcee Uvscan detected anything. Vernon Just use

Re: [Clamav-users] GDI+ bug exploit Mutations

2004-10-17 Thread Bogusaw Brandys
Hi, Vernon A. Fort wrote: Vernon A. Fort wrote: Steve Basford wrote: Hi, Can someone test ClamAV with these files: http://www.hiddenbit.org/demo_files/jpeg.zip Source: http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-October/027530.html Cheers, Steve

Re: [Clamav-users] GDI+ bug exploit Mutations

2004-10-17 Thread Steve Basford
Just use http://www.virustotal.com/ - excellent resource for scanning suspicious files with multiple engines at once. As mentioned in the Thanks all for the checking... as a extra site to bookmark, this site is good too: http://virusscan.jotti.dhs.org/ ( Jotti's malware scan: samples are added

Re: [Clamav-users] GDI+ bug exploit Mutations

2004-10-17 Thread Bogusaw Brandys
Steve Basford wrote: Just use http://www.virustotal.com/ - excellent resource for scanning suspicious files with multiple engines at once. As mentioned in the Thanks all for the checking... as a extra site to bookmark, this site is good too: http://virusscan.jotti.dhs.org/ ( Jotti's malware

Re: [Clamav-users] GDI+ bug exploit Mutations

2004-10-17 Thread Steve Basford
Thanks Jotti ! Really awesome site ! Good work! It's a very useful site, along with VirusTotal's site. Before I go anymore off-topic, just two points to note: a) Jotii isn't running the very lastest CVS version, he will only run the lastest STABLE version, so it won't cope too well with the

Re: [Clamav-users] GDI+ bug exploit Mutations

2004-10-17 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:14:00 +0100 Steve Basford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: b) VirusTotal's site has a more up to date version of ClamAV, using the builds from here (now and again): http://www.sosdg.org/clamav-win32/index.php I don't think so, it seems they're using ClamWin. -- oo

Re: [Clamav-users] GDI+ bug exploit Mutations

2004-10-17 Thread Niek
On 10/17/2004 10:14 PM +0200, Steve Basford wrote: Thanks Jotti ! Really awesome site ! Good work! It's a very useful site, along with VirusTotal's site. Before I go anymore off-topic, just two points to note: a) Jotii isn't running the very lastest CVS version, he will only run the lastest

Re: [Clamav-users] Bug in ClamAV-0.80rc4 - clamdscan error codes differ from clamscan

2004-10-17 Thread Jason Haar
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 02:06:54AM +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote: On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:03:51 +1300 Jason Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got a message being unable to be delivered via Qmail-Scanner because clamdscan is reporting Bad format or broken data ERROR when processing the

Re: [Clamav-users] Bug in ClamAV-0.80rc4 - clamdscan error codes differ from clamscan

2004-10-17 Thread Jason Haar
Whoops. Bad form, should have checked the code before sending. I'm afraid your patch is in 0.80 - but isn't working: Find attached a partial that triggers the error. bash$ clamdscan -V ClamAV 0.80/533/Sun Oct 17 14:09:44 2004 bash$ clamdscan Test_Emails//partial-1.eml partial-1.eml: Bad

[Clamav-users] strange behavior when scanning clamav-0.80.tar.gz vs clamav-0.80 source directory

2004-10-17 Thread Mark Reidenbach
After installing clamav 0.80, I was running some tests and came across something I found quite strange. If I run clamdscan or clamscan on the source directory, it finds the virii in the test directory, but if I scan the source tarball, it reports 0 of the test virii found. Even stranger, if

[Clamav-users] Freshclam: Can't Open /[logfile] in append Mode

2004-10-17 Thread Mike McCandless
I have clamav 0.75.1 on FC2. As root, when I run the command freshclam (no options at all), I get: ERROR: Can't open /var/log/clamav/freshclam.log in append mode. ERROR: Problem with internal logger. The permissions of what I would think is relevant are as follows: drwxrwxr-x 2 clamav clamav

[Clamav-users] clam.exe not being detected in mail

2004-10-17 Thread Robert Haas
From the command line both clamscan and clamdscan recognize the clamav-test-file signature when checking clam.exe. Yet, when sent as an email attachment it is no longer being detected by either, although the clam.zip archive containing the clam.exe executable is being properly detected. I

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam: Can't Open /[logfile] in append Mode

2004-10-17 Thread Mark Reidenbach
Hi Mike. I can recreate this problem if I don't have execute permissions on /var/log. If you do a chmod o+x /var/log I bet the problem will go away. Regards, Mark Reidenbach Mike McCandless wrote: I have clamav 0.75.1 on FC2. As root, when I run the command freshclam (no options at all), I

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam: Can't Open /[logfile] in append Mode

2004-10-17 Thread Mike McCandless
Bingo. What an easy change. Thanks for the quick reply. - Original Message - From: Mark Reidenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ClamAV users ML [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 7:05 PM Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam: Can't Open /[logfile] in append Mode Hi Mike. I

Re: [Clamav-users] strange behavior when scanning clamav-0.80.tar.gz vs clamav-0.80 source directory

2004-10-17 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 17:32:44 -0500 Mark Reidenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After installing clamav 0.80, I was running some tests and came across something I found quite strange. If I run clamdscan or clamscan on the source directory, it finds the virii in the test directory, but if I

Re: [Clamav-users] clam.exe not being detected in mail

2004-10-17 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On 17 Oct 2004 17:54:23 -0500 Robert Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now testing an email with clam.exe attached. [EMAIL PROTECTED] rob-lists]$ clamscan mail.clamexe mail.clamexe: OK removed verbosity Same tests with clam.zip [EMAIL PROTECTED] rob-lists]$ clamscan clam.zip clam.zip:

Re: [Clamav-users] Bug in ClamAV-0.80rc4 - clamdscan error codes differ from clamscan

2004-10-17 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:25:37 +1300 Jason Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whoops. Bad form, should have checked the code before sending. I'm afraid your patch is in 0.80 - but isn't working: Find attached a partial that triggers the error. Too late... -- oo. Tomasz

Re: [Clamav-users] Bug in ClamAV-0.80rc4 - clamdscan error codes differ from clamscan

2004-10-17 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 03:07:13 +0200 Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:25:37 +1300 Jason Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whoops. Bad form, should have checked the code before sending. I'm afraid your patch is in 0.80 - but isn't working: Find attached a

Re: [Clamav-users] Bug in ClamAV-0.80rc4 - clamdscan error codes differ from clamscan

2004-10-17 Thread Jason Haar
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 03:09 +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote: Oh, no. It's working just fine: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ clamscan partial-1.eml LibClamAV Warning: Partial message received from MUA/MTA - message cannot be scanned LibClamAV Warning: Descriptor[3]: Bad format or broken data

Re: [Clamav-users] Bug in ClamAV-0.80rc4 - clamdscan error codes differ from clamscan

2004-10-17 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:23:59 +1300 Jason Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 03:09 +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote: Oh, no. It's working just fine: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ clamscan partial-1.eml LibClamAV Warning: Partial message received from MUA/MTA - message cannot be

Re: [Clamav-users] clam.exe not being detected in mail

2004-10-17 Thread Robert Haas
Hmmm... I don't understand why mail.clamzip is properly detected and mail.clamexe isn't. Please double check it's a proper mail file. Here is how I am testing this, perhaps there is a problem in how I am doing so? - -rw-r--r--1 rob-lists rob-lists 544 Oct 17 17:22 clam.exe

Re: [Clamav-users] Bug in ClamAV-0.80rc4 - clamdscan error codes differ from clamscan

2004-10-17 Thread Jason Haar
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 03:27 +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote: I'm almost sure you're still running the old instance of clamd. Restarting it should solve the problem. Sheesh - do I feel STUPID :-) Thanks. The two examples I had that caused this problem are now exit status zero - so I'm happy.

Re: [Clamav-users] GDI+ bug exploit Mutations

2004-10-17 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:36:22 -0500 (CDT) Damian Menscher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For those running 0.80rc4 or 0.80 final, you can catch all jpeg exploits with the following signature (add it to a local.ndb file in your database directory): Exploit.JPEG.Comment.FalsePos:5:0:ffd8ff

Re: [Clamav-users] GDI+ bug exploit Mutations

2004-10-17 Thread D Walsh
On Oct 17, 2004, at 22:49, Tomasz Kojm wrote: On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:36:22 -0500 (CDT) Damian Menscher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For those running 0.80rc4 or 0.80 final, you can catch all jpeg exploits with the following signature (add it to a local.ndb file in your database directory):

Re: [Clamav-users] GDI+ bug exploit Mutations

2004-10-17 Thread Damian Menscher
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004, D Walsh wrote: On Oct 17, 2004, at 22:49, Tomasz Kojm wrote: On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:36:22 -0500 (CDT) Damian Menscher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For those running 0.80rc4 or 0.80 final, you can catch all jpeg exploits with the following signature (add it to a local.ndb file in

Re: [Clamav-users] daily.cvd and main.cvd

2004-10-17 Thread Stephen Gran
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 03:40:23PM -0400, D Walsh said: On Oct 17, 2004, at 11:36, Stephen Gran wrote: On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 09:51:53AM -0400, D Walsh said: While I am very happy with clamav, I see room for expansion and potential in a limited global environment. Is it possible to