Re: [Clamav-users] clamdscan vs clamscan - detection

2005-06-01 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Tue, 31 May 2005 at 9:57:13 -0700, Todd Lyons wrote: Odhiambo Washington wanted us to know: Please, set the Debug flag in your clamd.conf, rescan the sample, and send us the logs. I cannot do that on the box where this phenomena is manifesting itself because it's a production box,

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter dies

2005-06-01 Thread Joe Maimon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To clarify, the milter isn't dying... it's just refusing to accept inputs (there's a difference). And the issue is with the milter, not with libclamav. In my case the milter is dying, and needs to be re-started... (started should I say).

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter dies

2005-06-01 Thread Bonar
Try not to use this in /etc/clamd.conf # If an email contains URLs ClamAV can download and scan them. # WARNING: This option may open your system to a DoS attack. # Never use it on loaded servers. # Default: disabled #MailFollowURLs I've detect that in my clmd.log LibClamAV Warning:

Re: [Clamav-users] Memory limit per process hit

2005-06-01 Thread Joe Maimon
Pablo Alsina wrote: On 5/28/05, Matt Fretwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip If this is not your preferred solution, how do you suggest to stop those scumbags searching for my user-database? Remember I'm not stopping spammers, I'm stopping user-db harvesters (probably future spammers). My

[Clamav-users] 553 5.5.4 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Real domain name required for sender address

2005-06-01 Thread Bonar
I get this error while clamav want to report to me if it's detect a mailvirusses. The original message was received at Wed, 1 Jun 2005 20:33:47 +0800 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reason: 553 5.5.4 [EMAIL

[Clamav-users] backward compatibility questions

2005-06-01 Thread Joanna Roman
I am using 0.83. If I do not upgrade, will clamd eventually refuse to reload main.cvd and daily.cvd ? I already noticed that the new sigtool refuses to list sigs if I used it on older versions of virus databases. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam?

Re: [Clamav-users] backward compatibility questions

2005-06-01 Thread Joanna Roman
--- Brian Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:16:06 -0700 (PDT) in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Joanna Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am using 0.83. If I do not upgrade, will clamd eventually refuse to reload main.cvd and daily.cvd ? I already noticed that the new

Re: [Clamav-users] backward compatibility questions

2005-06-01 Thread Brian Morrison
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:41:46 -0700 (PDT) in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Joanna Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I dont think odd that the virus db format got changed again is very low. BTW, what do you mean by 0.8x is 'useless' ? What do you mean by 'useless' ? I mean that if you are using 0.8x when

[Clamav-users] undefined reference to `smfi_opensocket'

2005-06-01 Thread Troy Ayers
When compiling the latest snapshot of clam I too get clamav-milter.c:1573: undefined reference to `smfi_opensocket' I have sendmail 8.13.3 (with libmilter support of course) My current version of clamav-milter is .82c Debian linux kernel 2.4.22 What did I miss? -- Troy

FW: [Clamav-users] 553 5.5.4 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Real domain name required for sender address

2005-06-01 Thread bonar
Do anyone know bout this problems??? Need advise how to configure this things... Pleasee. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonar Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 9:04 PM To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Subject: [Clamav-users] 553

Re: FW: [Clamav-users] 553 5.5.4 clamav@localhost.localdomain... Real domain name required for sender address

2005-06-01 Thread Dennis Peterson
bonar said: Do anyone know bout this problems??? Need advise how to configure this things... Pleasee. It looks more like a configuration/masquerading problem in Sendmail than a ClamAV error. dp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

[Clamav-users] Re: FW: 553 5.5.4 clamav@localhost.localdomain... Real domain name required for sender address

2005-06-01 Thread René Berber
bonar wrote: My question is, how to change '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. I'm using sendmail on Fedora Core 3 box. All my user account will get [EMAIL PROTECTED] Other question is, how to change 'while talking to [127.0.0.1]' to 'while talking to [192.168.1.1]'... Please

Re: [Clamav-users] 553 5.5.4 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Real domain name required for sender address

2005-06-01 Thread Damian Menscher
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Bonar wrote: - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to [127.0.0.1]: MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=609 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 553 5.5.4 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Real domain name required for sender address 501 5.6.0 Data format error Just a guess, but

Re: FW: [Clamav-users] 553 5.5.4 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Real domain name required for sender address

2005-06-01 Thread Stephen Gran
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 10:53:01AM +0800, bonar said: Do anyone know bout this problems??? Need advise how to configure this things... Pleasee. My question is, how to change '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. I'm using sendmail on Fedora Core 3 box. All my user account will

RE: FW: [Clamav-users] 553 5.5.4 [EMAIL PROTECTED]...Real domain name required for sender address

2005-06-01 Thread bonar
This is my maillog at /var/log/maillog: Jun 2 13:12:24 uetheta sendmail[4085]: j525Bh7b004085: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=1483, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=[EMAIL PROTECTED], proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=uealpha [192.168.1.1] Jun 2 13:12:24 uetheta sendmail[4085]: j525Bh7b004085: Milter add: