[Clamav-users] Re: ClamAV 0.90 - Failed to compile
On 20/02/2007 04:53, Vinyl Bne wrote: I tried to upgrade to ClamAV 0.90 and failed while compiling. The same configure option was fine with ClamAV 0.8x.xx Below is the snippet of compilation message/error. The configure line is *./configure --enable-milter --with-dbdir=/var/clamdb --with-user=defang --with-group=defang * * --localstatedir=/var/run --sysconfdir=/etc --with-zlib* Appreciate for all help. cheers, VinylBNE --8-- . . . Making all in etc Target all is up to date. Making all in clamav-milter . . . if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../clamd -I../libclamav -I../shared -I/chroot/sendmail/usr/include -I/opt/oss/include -I/opt/oss/include -g -O2 -MT misc.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/misc.Tpo -c -o misc.o `test -f '../shared/misc.c' || echo './'`../shared/misc.c; then mv -f .deps/misc.Tpo .deps/misc.Po; else rm -f .deps/misc.Tpo; exit 1; fi if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../clamd -I../libclamav -I../shared -I/chroot/sendmail/usr/include -I/opt/oss/include -I/opt/oss/include -g -O2 -MT network.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/network.Tpo -c -o network.o `test -f '../shared/network.c' || echo './'`../shared/network.c; then mv -f .deps/network.Tpo .deps/network.Po; else rm -f .deps/network.Tpo; exit 1; fi ../shared/network.c: In function `r_gethostbyname': ../shared/network.c:80: warning: passing arg 2 of `gethostbyname_r' from incompatible pointer type if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../clamd -I../libclamav -I../shared -I/chroot/sendmail/usr/include -I/opt/oss/include -I/opt/oss/include -g -O2 -MT clamav-milter.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/clamav- milter.Tpo -c -o clamav-milter.o clamav-milter.c; then mv -f .deps/clamav-milter.Tpo .deps/clamav-milter.Po; else rm -f .deps/clamav-milter.Tpo; exit 1; fi clamav-milter.c: In function `main': clamav-milter.c:1120: warning: passing arg 2 of `setgroups' discards qualifiers from pointer target type clamav-milter.c:1263: error: `logg_syslog' undeclared (first use in this function) clamav-milter.c:1263: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once clamav-milter.c:1263: error: for each function it appears in.) clamav-milter.c: In function `clamfi_eom': clamav-milter.c:3547: warning: passing arg 2 of `smfi_addrcpt' discards qualifiers from pointer target type clamav-milter.c:3588: warning: passing arg 2 of `smfi_addrcpt' discards qualifiers from pointer target type I'm not sure about the warnings, but the error on line 1263 needs fixing. It hasn't been fixed in the latest clamav-devel, so you should file a bug report on the ClamAV bugtracker. -- -=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd.E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED])=- -=( Tel: +44 (0)161 477 1898 FAX: +44 (0)161 718 3587 )=- ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Creation of binary .rpm package.
hello try to download some rpm from: http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/clamav/ bests Graeme Nichols escribió: Bill Randle wrote: On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 12:58 +1100, Graeme Nichols wrote: Hello, I tried to create a binary .rpm package from the clamav-0.90.tar.gz tarball using the command 'rpmbuild -tb clamav-0.90.tar.gz' which failed with the following errors: Is there a .spec file available for this tarball to enable me to build a .rpm binary under FC6 as there is no .rpm binary on the clamav repositories (no '6' directory at all) If not, is there any other way to build an .rpm binary package? Installing manually is not an option. Creates too many problems at a later date or when upgrading the distribution. Have you considered downloading an SRPM file for an earlier distro (FC5, FC4) and build using that spec file? Chances are, it will work unchanged on FC6. -Bill Hi Bill, nope, I hadn't thought of that but wouldn't I need a .src.rpm for the 0.90 release? Do you know how to get the spec file out of the older .src.rpm package for, say, FC5, and use it on the latest release tarball? I know enough in this area to get by but no more. Thanks -- Lorenzo Ortega Área de Aplicaciones - Correo T-OnlineSpain GrupoDeutsche Telekom Edificio Gorbea 4 Avda. Bruselas, 20 1ª planta 28108 Alcobendas - Madrid Telf: +34 911 41 7874 Este mensaje puede contener información confidencial dirigida únicamente a su destinatario. Si usted no es el destinatario de este mensaje, según consta en el mismo, por favor destruya el mensaje y advierta al remitente del error respondiendo a este mensaje por correo electrónico. No está autorizada la copia o entrega de este mensaje a quienes no son destinatarios del mismo. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
RE: [Clamav-users] 0.9 update libssl and libcrypto
ok, thanks a lot, it works. too bad for the automatical updates...(yum) Daniele Marco Bevar Mondo Rondo Web Factory http://www.mondorondo.com/ -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Henrik Krohns Envoyé : lundi, 19. février 2007 12:19 À : clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Objet : Re: [Clamav-users] 0.9 update libssl and libcrypto On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 10:53:34AM +0100, Dan wrote: Hi, I'm running clamav 0.88.7 on a FC5 for a OpenXchange mail server. Trying to update to .9 I see that it needs libssl.so.6 and libcrypto.so.6 (i'm working in .5) This means upgrading from mysql to cyrus and postfix, openssl, httpd and perl, openldap and almost everything. OpenXchange install is so fragile...is it there any workaround to leave actual .5 libs for everything, and .6 for clamav? Thanks for your help ClamAV does nothing with SSL. Curl does, so just compile without it (it has no other use than the bad URL downloading feature). configure --with-libcurl=no Cheers, Henrik ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
[Clamav-users] Problem with upgrade
Hi, I have a problem with upgrade from 0.88.7 to 0.90 on Fedora Core 5. My steps for upgrade are: #cd /usr/local/src #tar xzvf clamav-0.90.tar.gz #service postfix stop #service clamd stop #rm -f /usr/local/lib/*clam* #cd clamav-0.90 #./configure make make install #service clamd start [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# service clamd start Avvio di clamd: ERROR: Parse error at line 76: Option FixStaleSocket requires boolean argument. ERROR: Can't open/parse the config file /usr/local/etc/clamd.conf [FALLITO] Where is my error ? Thanks. -- Salvatore. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Using clamassassin with 0.90 - failed error 40!
--As of February 20, 2007 10:02:12 AM +0800, Richard is alleged to have said: I finally found that error 40 is because of calling an unknown option. It seems the clamassassin is calling clamscan with something wrong now. It worked fine, and again works ok since I downgraded to 0.88.7. Am I the only one having this problem? I am again using 0.88.7 with 0.90 engine for now, and it is scanning properly again, and finding viruses as usual. --As for the rest, it is mine. From the clamassassin-announce mailing list a couple of days ago: There is a compatibility problem when using clamassassin 1.2.3 with the new ClamAV 0.90 release. The new ClamAV release has changed some of the command line options, and one of these changes makes clamassassin not work correctly when using clamscan. However, using clamassassin with clamdscan doesn't seem to have any problems. snip / 1) Configure your system to run clamd and using clamdscan in clamassassin. (This will give you better performance too!) 2) If you want to remain using clamscan, edit the clamassassin script and search for the line reading: CLAMSCANOPT=--no-summary --stdout --mbox Change this to: CLAMSCANOPT=--no-summary --stdout Daniel T. Staal ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with upgrade
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 02:15:56PM +0100, ShopOnWeb wrote: Hi, I have a problem with upgrade from 0.88.7 to 0.90 on Fedora Core 5. My steps for upgrade are: #cd /usr/local/src #tar xzvf clamav-0.90.tar.gz #service postfix stop #service clamd stop #rm -f /usr/local/lib/*clam* #cd clamav-0.90 #./configure make make install #service clamd start [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# service clamd start Avvio di clamd: ERROR: Parse error at line 76: Option FixStaleSocket requires boolean argument. ERROR: Can't open/parse the config file /usr/local/etc/clamd.conf [FALLITO] Where is my error ? You forgot to look at the UPGRADE file. -- Jan-Pieter Cornet [EMAIL PROTECTED] !! Disclamer: The addressee of this email is not the intended recipient. !! !! This is only a test of the echelon and data retention systems. Please !! !! archive this message indefinitely to allow verification of the logs. !! ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Perl module Mail::ClamAV not compatible with ver.0.90
hi,
we had the same problems with Mail::ClamAV (version 0.17) and clamav
0.90. Attached you will find a simple patch for Mail::Clamav (no
modification in clamav). Please note, that I have not realy verified
this patch (some deprecated functions and definitions).
Reinhard
René Berber wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Is anybody working on upgrading perl module Mail::ClamAV?
Current version 0.17 does not build under clamav version 0.90, there's at least
2 defined constants that don't exist anymore, maybe other problems.
The real problem will show for users of MailScanner, without a re-build MS spins
creating processes and killing them with no mail being scanned. I guess there
is the option of using clamscan (or clamdscan with patches to MS).
- --
René Berber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF0qoAL3NNweKTRgwRAvsuAKCCAA1fR72HpuOEz9FxOs/SpYjJxQCggVrH
kzX2ecImmLRhe3FjzEv2Ze0=
=K5Hl
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
diff -urNp Mail-ClamAV-0.17.orig/ClamAV.pm Mail-ClamAV-0.17/ClamAV.pm
--- Mail-ClamAV-0.17.orig/ClamAV.pm 2005-03-08 11:07:54.0 +0100
+++ Mail-ClamAV-0.17/ClamAV.pm 2007-02-20 14:03:46.0 +0100
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ our @ISA = qw(Exporter);
sub CL_RAW() { CL_SCAN_RAW() }
sub CL_ARCHIVE() { CL_SCAN_ARCHIVE() }
sub CL_MAIL () { CL_SCAN_MAIL() }
-sub CL_DISABLERAR () { CL_SCAN_DISABLERAR() }
sub CL_OLE2 () { CL_SCAN_OLE2() }
sub CL_ENCRYPTED () { CL_SCAN_BLOCKENCRYPTED() }
sub CL_BLOCKENCRYPTED () { CL_SCAN_BLOCKENCRYPTED() }
@@ -50,7 +49,6 @@ our %EXPORT_TAGS = ( 'all' = [ qw(
CL_EMAXFILES
CL_ERAR
CL_EZIP
-CL_EMALFZIP
CL_EGZIP
CL_EBZIP
CL_EOLE2
@@ -76,7 +74,6 @@ our %EXPORT_TAGS = ( 'all' = [ qw(
CL_SCAN_RAW
CL_SCAN_ARCHIVE
CL_SCAN_MAIL
-CL_SCAN_DISABLERAR
CL_SCAN_OLE2
CL_SCAN_BLOCKENCRYPTED
CL_SCAN_HTML
@@ -276,7 +273,7 @@ char *clamav_perl_retdbdir()
void clamav_perl_buildtrie(SV *self)
{
struct clamav_perl *c = SvClam(self);
-cl_buildtrie(c-root);
+cl_build(c-root);
}
int clamav_perl_maxreclevel(SV *self, ...)
@@ -344,44 +341,10 @@ int clamav_perl_archivememlim(SV *self,
return SvClam(self)-limits.archivememlim;
}
-void clamav_perl__scanbuff(SV *self, SV *buff)
-{
-struct clamav_perl *c = SvClam(self);
-STRLEN len;
-int status;
-char *b;
-const char *msg;
-SV *smsg;
-Inline_Stack_Vars;
-
-Inline_Stack_Reset;
-
-if (SvTAINTED(buff))
-croak(buff argument specified to scanbuff() is tainted);
-
-b = SvPV(buff, len);
-status = cl_scanbuff(b, len, msg, c-root);
-
-smsg = sv_newmortal();
-sv_setiv(smsg, (IV)status);
-
-/* msg is some random memory if no virus was found */
-if (status == CL_VIRUS)
-sv_setpv(smsg, msg);
-else if (status == CL_CLEAN)
-sv_setpv(smsg, Clean);
-else
-sv_setpv(smsg, cl_perror(status));
-
-SvIOK_on(smsg);
-Inline_Stack_Push(smsg);
-Inline_Stack_Done;
-}
-
void DESTROY(SV *self)
{
struct clamav_perl *c = SvClam(self);
-cl_freetrie(c-root);
+cl_free(c-root);
if (c-is_dir == 1)
cl_statfree(c-st);
Safefree(c-path);
@@ -415,7 +378,7 @@ void clamav_perl__scanfd(SV *self, int f
else if (status == CL_CLEAN)
sv_setpv(smsg, Clean);
else
-sv_setpv(smsg, cl_perror(status));
+sv_setpv(smsg, cl_strerror(status));
SvIOK_on(smsg);
Inline_Stack_Push(smsg);
@@ -456,7 +419,7 @@ void clamav_perl__scanfile(SV *self, SV
else if (status == CL_CLEAN)
sv_setpv(smsg, Clean);
else
-sv_setpv(smsg, cl_perror(status));
+sv_setpv(smsg, cl_strerror(status));
SvIOK_on(smsg);
Inline_Stack_Push(smsg);
@@ -479,7 +442,7 @@ static void error(int errcode)
SV *err = get_sv(Mail::ClamAV::Error, TRUE);
sv_setiv(err, (IV)errcode);
-e = cl_perror(errcode);
+e = cl_strerror(errcode);
sv_setpv(err, e);
SvIOK_on(err);
}
@@ -494,7 +457,6 @@ int clamav_perl_constant(char *name)
if (strEQ(CL_EMAXFILES, name)) return CL_EMAXFILES;
if (strEQ(CL_ERAR, name)) return CL_ERAR;
if (strEQ(CL_EZIP, name)) return CL_EZIP;
-if (strEQ(CL_EMALFZIP, name)) return CL_EMALFZIP;
if (strEQ(CL_EGZIP, name)) return CL_EGZIP;
if (strEQ(CL_EBZIP, name)) return CL_EBZIP;
if (strEQ(CL_EOLE2, name)) return CL_EOLE2;
@@ -520,7 +482,6 @@ int clamav_perl_constant(char *name)
if (strEQ(CL_SCAN_RAW, name)) return CL_SCAN_RAW;
if (strEQ(CL_SCAN_ARCHIVE, name)) return CL_SCAN_ARCHIVE;
if (strEQ(CL_SCAN_MAIL, name)) return CL_SCAN_MAIL;
-if (strEQ(CL_SCAN_DISABLERAR, name))
[Clamav-users] Update fail in clamav-0.90
Hi all When I write the command freshclam as root, the file main.cvd don't updated, your date is 31 Dic with 83.951 viruses. The file daily.inc is OK in your version. When I run clamscan say OK, and your database have 93.275 viruses known ¿¿¿ Someone idea Miguel ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Is clamav 0.88.7-1 Vulnerable
I am using this FreeBSD package. File: clamav-0.88.7_1.tgz 744 KB 12/30/2006 12:49:00 PM My question now is: Is this clamav Vulnerable? Thanks for your information. --- Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 01:25:30PM -0800, Antonio Storni said: Hi, I have recieved news of the recent vulnerabilities of clamav, and all the public advisories suggest upgrade to version 0.9 iDefense has confirmed this vulnerability affects Clam AntiVirus ClamAV v0.88.6. All versions prior to the 0.90 stable release are suspected to be vulnerable. My question is: Is clamav 0.88.7-1 Vulnerable? There is no clamav official version 0.88.7-1, only 0.88.7. I assume the -1 is a standard distro version marker, but without knowing what distro, I can't guess the answer. In Debian, 0.88.7-1 is vulnerable, 0.88.7-2 is not. -- -- | Stephen Gran | Hindsight is always 20:20. -- Billy | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Wilder | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | | -- ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate in the Yahoo! Answers Food Drink QA. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=listsid=396545367 ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Is clamav 0.88.7-1 Vulnerable
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:51:40 -0800 (PST) Antonio Storni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am using this FreeBSD package. File: clamav-0.88.7_1.tgz 744 KB 12/30/2006 12:49:00 PM My question now is: Is this clamav Vulnerable? Thanks for your information. I am not sure about the vulnerability factor; however, these are the ports for clamav presently available in the ports system. Port: clamav-0.90_2 Path: /usr/ports/security/clamav Info: Command line virus scanner written entirely in C Maint: [EMAIL PROTECTED] B-deps: libgmp-4.2.1_2 libtool-1.5.22_3 R-deps: arc-5.21o_1 arj-3.10.22 lha-1.14i_6 libgmp-4.2.1_2 unzoo-4.4_2 WWW:http://www.clamav.net/ Port: clamav-devel-20070218 Path: /usr/ports/security/clamav-devel Info: Command line virus scanner written entirely in C Maint: [EMAIL PROTECTED] B-deps: libgmp-4.2.1_2 libtool-1.5.22_3 R-deps: arc-5.21o_1 arj-3.10.22 lha-1.14i_6 libgmp-4.2.1_2 unzoo-4.4_2 WWW:http://www.clamav.net/ I have the clamav-devel one installed myself and it works fine. You might want to consider updating. -- Gerard Elegance and truth are inversely related. Becker's Razor signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Update fail in clamav-0.90
From http://www.clamav.net/ Latest ClamAV stable release is: 0.90 Total number of signatures: 93275 ClamAV Virus Databases: main.cvd ver. 42 released on 31 Dec 2006 13:09 +0100 daily.cvd ver. 2612 released on 20 Feb 2007 12:28 + --- Miguel Rois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all When I write the command freshclam as root, the file main.cvd don't updated, your date is 31 Dic with 83.951 viruses. The file daily.inc is OK in your version. When I run clamscan say OK, and your database have 93.275 viruses known ¿¿¿ Someone idea Miguel ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Problems with version 0.90 amd webmin
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 11:09 +0100, smc-oper wrote:
I need help about clamav and webmin.We made the update to version
090.rc2.Now we have the problem when we want to use webmin.
Why are you using an old release candidate? You should update to the
officially released version 0.90 instead.
We get the message Bitte geben Sie im Konfigurationsmodul den Ort der
zweiten Unterschriftsdatenbank an (das sollte daily.cvd sein)
Because we only have now an daily.inc, not an daily.cvd.
What can we do now?
Note: I never used webmin for ClamAV. Also, I did not have my coffee
yet. ;)
Such issues happen rather frequently. That is, every time the software
changes some behavior or configuration settings (as in this case). The
ClamAV configuration changed, and the webmin module will be out-of-date
and most likely dysfunctional, until they caught up and support the 0.90
configuration style.
You will need an updated webmin to use it with ClamAV 0.90.
Btw, that translated (German) webmin warning sounds pretty poor. Indeed,
a Signature can be translated with Unterschrift (as in your name, hand
written), but a translation of Signatur would make so much more
sense... Maybe someone wanna tell the webmin team?
guenther
--
char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED];
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1:
(c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with upgrade
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:15:56 +0100 ShopOnWeb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# service clamd start Avvio di clamd: ERROR: Parse error at line 76: Option FixStaleSocket requires boolean argument. ERROR: Can't open/parse the config file /usr/local/etc/clamd.conf [FALLITO] Where is my error ? So what do you see at line 76 of clamd.conf? -- Brian Morrison bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud; after a while you realize you are muddy and the pig is enjoying it. GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with upgrade
Brian Morrison wrote: So what do you see at line 76 of clamd.conf? In clamd.conf at line 76 I have: FixStaleSocket Thanks. -- Salvatore. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with upgrade
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:53:04 +0100 Salvatore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brian Morrison wrote: So what do you see at line 76 of clamd.conf? In clamd.conf at line 76 I have: FixStaleSocket The error message tells you that it: requires boolean argument. -- Brian Morrison bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud; after a while you realize you are muddy and the pig is enjoying it. GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with upgrade
Salvatore wrote: In clamd.conf at line 76 I have: FixStaleSocket 0.9x introduces a new configuration syntax: you can now turn single options on and off, the old crude hack of DisableDefaultScanOptions is no longer required. Please have a look at the examples: clamav-0.9*/etc/clamd.conf and clamav-0.9*/etc/freshclam.conf (from the install instructions) You have to say FixStaleSocket yes (or no or true or false or 1 or 0, I think) That's what your error message mean by missing Boolean argument Of course, there are several more to alter as well :) Jon ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with upgrade
Salvatore spake thusly on Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 09:53:04PM +0100: Brian Morrison wrote: So what do you see at line 76 of clamd.conf? In clamd.conf at line 76 I have: FixStaleSocket Thanks. -- Salvatore. --- end quoted text --- Read the error a little more closely and you'll see that it expects a boolean option to FixStaleSocket (e.g. yes|no,true|false,1|0). The most recent version of clamav has changed the configuration file format. Go back and read the current clamav documentation. -- Regards, Richard Did this email or post help you? If so, please rate me at affero: http://rate.affero.net/RhunDraco Have the courage to take your own thoughts seriously, for they will shape you. -- Albert Einstein pgpHZTFVTN4Vk.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with upgrade
Salvatore wrote: FixStaleSocket How about: **FixStaleSocket yes FixStaleSocket no In other words, the format for .conf files changed in 0.90... you need yes/no after the option. Example: http://svn.clamav.net/websvn/filedetails.php?repname=clamav-develpath=%2Ftrunk%2Fetc%2Fclamd.confrev=0sc=0 http://svn.clamav.net/websvn/filedetails.php?repname=clamav-develpath=%2Ftrunk%2Fetc%2Fclamd.confrev=0sc=0http://svn.clamav.net/websvn/filedetails.php?repname=clamav-develpath=%2Ftrunk%2Fetc%2Ffreshclam.confrev=0sc=0 http://svn.clamav.net/websvn/filedetails.php?repname=clamav-develpath=%2Ftrunk%2Fetc%2Ffreshclam.confrev=0sc=0 Cheers, Steve ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
[Clamav-users] Clamd is dying silently after about an hour
This morning I installed clamav-0.90 on our main mail server at work, a V210 running Solaris 10. I enabled the experimental code, and there was no problem building (except for the previously discussed LDFLAGS problem, which resurfaced). After about an hour, or maybe at busy times, clamd disappears without a trace. No core dump, nothing in the logs. I re-installed without the experimental code, and so far, it seems to be working happily. I realise this is not enough information for anyone to help, so the question is, what more information would you like, and how do I go about getting it? gdb is not installed on the machine, only the Sun debuggers. Jon ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with upgrade
Salvatore wrote: Brian Morrison wrote: So what do you see at line 76 of clamd.conf? In clamd.conf at line 76 I have: FixStaleSocket Avvio di clamd: ERROR: Parse error at line 76: Option FixStaleSocket requires boolean argument. ^^^ Thanks. -- Salvatore. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Clamd is dying silently after about an hour
After about an hour, or maybe at busy times, clamd disappears without a trace. No core dump, nothing in the logs. This happens on every Solaris instance I've built. It does not matter if it is Sol8, Sol9, or Sol10. I've not had time to go back in and rebuild it without the experimental code. dp ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Clamd is dying silently after about an hour
Dennis Peterson wrote: This happens on every Solaris instance I've built. Ah. Well perhaps you will be pleased to hear that the Solaris x86 version you helped me with the other day is still going strong, although admittedly on a very lightly loaded machine (40-60 messages a day). Jon ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90?
Dennis Peterson wrote: So, its been a few days. How is everyone feeling about the new version? I've hesitated to upgrade just yet. I've seen alot of feedback indicating problems and very little about smooth and great upgrades. What's the general concensous - You can't upgrade fast enough or Stay where you are? I just had to back it out of production. It would not run more than a couple minutes under a normal load that 88.7 shrugs off. It dies without any error messages. Same here. Tried to roll it into production in an exim/clamav setup. Had to back it out because it just got slower, and slower and then it stopped. No errors, just no more action. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90?
Tomasz Kojm wrote: On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:13:38 -0800 Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tomasz Kojm wrote the following on 2/15/2007 3:00 PM -0800: On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:51:54 -0800 Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just had to back it out of production. It would not run more than a couple minutes under a normal load that 88.7 shrugs off. It dies without any error messages. dp Yep, I observed the same behavior on Fedora Core 3, where clamd 0.90 dies without any indication as to why in any log files. Not good... You didn't provide _any_ information that could be useful to us for debugging those issues. What kind of info would you want me to provide when there were no indications anywhere as to why clamd dies? I have not reverted back At least some basic information, eg. how you compiled ClamAV, did you use --enable-experimental, platform details, etc. I had the same problems. FreeBSD/i386 6.2p1 and 6.2p0. Compiled directly from the ports collection, without --experimental. As far as we could tell, it just scanned slower and slower and then stopped scanning. If there's anything I can do to help get the info required to fix this, let me know. Kevin Way InsideSystems, Inc. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Creation of binary .rpm package.
Lorenzo Ortega wrote: hello try to download some rpm from: http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/clamav/ bests Hello Lorenzo, thank you very much for that information. I'll go look. Regards, Graeme. Graeme Nichols escribió: Bill Randle wrote: On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 12:58 +1100, Graeme Nichols wrote: Hello, I tried to create a binary .rpm package from the clamav-0.90.tar.gz tarball using the command 'rpmbuild -tb clamav-0.90.tar.gz' which failed with the following errors: Is there a .spec file available for this tarball to enable me to build a .rpm binary under FC6 as there is no .rpm binary on the clamav repositories (no '6' directory at all) If not, is there any other way to build an .rpm binary package? Installing manually is not an option. Creates too many problems at a later date or when upgrading the distribution. Have you considered downloading an SRPM file for an earlier distro (FC5, FC4) and build using that spec file? Chances are, it will work unchanged on FC6. -Bill Hi Bill, nope, I hadn't thought of that but wouldn't I need a .src.rpm for the 0.90 release? Do you know how to get the spec file out of the older .src.rpm package for, say, FC5, and use it on the latest release tarball? I know enough in this area to get by but no more. Thanks -- -- Kind regards, Graeme. -- Download my GnuPG public key from:- http://www.users.tpg.com.au/gnichols/graemenichols.pub -- Reality is just a crutch for people who can't handle science fiction. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Creation of binary .rpm package.
Eric Hoeve wrote: Graeme Nichols wrote: Hello, I tried to create a binary .rpm package from the clamav-0.90.tar.gz tarball using the command 'rpmbuild -tb clamav-0.90.tar.gz' which failed with the following errors: [EMAIL PROTECTED] download]# rpmbuild -tb clamav-0.90.tar.gz error: Name field must be present in package: (main package) error: Version field must be present in package: (main package) error: Release field must be present in package: (main package) error: Summary field must be present in package: (main package) error: Group field must be present in package: (main package) error: License field must be present in package: (main package) [EMAIL PROTECTED] download]# Previous experience tells me this error is because there is no .spec file in the tarball and I couldn't find one in the tarball. Is there a .spec file available for this tarball to enable me to build a .rpm binary under FC6 as there is no .rpm binary on the clamav repositories (no '6' directory at all) If not, is there any other way to build an .rpm binary package? Installing manually is not an option. Creates too many problems at a later date or when upgrading the distribution. It would be very nice to have a .spec file included in the tarball because distributions that use the RedHat Package Manager can create their own .rpm binary obviating the need for the developers or whoever to create one for each distribution. Thanks. You might want to take a look at: http://atrpms.net/dist/fc6/clamav/ -Eric Hello Eric, Thank you for that info. I didn't find that repository when I went searching on the net. I have bookmarked it. Thanks again. -- -- Kind regards, Graeme. -- Download my GnuPG public key from:- http://www.users.tpg.com.au/gnichols/graemenichols.pub -- Reality is just a crutch for people who can't handle science fiction. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Perl module Mail::ClamAV not compatible with ver.0.90
At CPAN there's a new version of Mail::ClamAV (0.20), but it doesn't show any test and isn't packaged yet. Looks like is still in dev process. See: http://search.cpan.org/~sabeck/Mail-ClamAV/ And: http://search.cpan.org/src/SABECK/Mail-ClamAV-0.20/ Worked fine for me. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Re: clamav 0.90 -- Debian packages?
Can anybody explain what to write into /etc/apt/sources.list for Debian-Etch ? I tried to use the entry published in the Wiki, but this doesn't work.. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Re: clamav 0.90 -- Debian packages?
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 01:56:20AM +0100, Lutz Petersen said: Can anybody explain what to write into /etc/apt/sources.list for Debian-Etch ? I tried to use the entry published in the Wiki, but this doesn't work.. The packages for 0.90 have not yet made it to etch. They are going to take a coordinated push to make sure the update breaks nothing else. If you want, you can just grab the packages from unstable and install directly on etch - nothing much should have changed, so they should install without any problems right now. -- -- | Stephen Gran | If only God would give me some clear| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | sign! Like making a large deposit in | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | my name at a Swiss Bank. - Woody Allen | -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
[Clamav-users] Error compiling 0.90_2 on FreeBSD
Hi, I'm trying to upgrade to the latest version, however it gets an error in building libclamav. It seems that libpthread is required now, but it does not exist on the system I'm compiling on. It has never had a problem with this in the past. Here is the compiler output: bsd-ns2# make all === Building for clamav-0.90_2 make all-recursive Making all in libclamav /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --tag=CC --mode=link cc -O -pipe -L/usr/local/lib -pthread -o libclamav.la -rpath /usr/local/lib -thread-safe -version-info 1:40:0 -no-undefined matcher-ac.lo matcher-bm.lo matcher-ncore.lo matcher.lo md5.lo others.lo readdb.lo cvd.lo dsig.lo str.lo scanners.lo filetypes.lo rtf.lo blob.lo mbox.lo message.lo snprintf.lo table.lo text.lo ole2_extract.lo vba_extract.lo msexpand.lo pe.lo upx.lo htmlnorm.lo chmunpack.lo rebuildpe.lo petite.lo wwunpack.lo suecrypt.lo unsp.lo packlibs.lo fsg.lo mew.lo upack.lo line.lo untar.lo unzip.lo special.lo binhex.lo is_tar.lo tnef.lo unrar15.lo unrarvm.lo unrar.lo unrarfilter.lo unrarppm.lo unrar20.lo unrarcmd.lo pdf.lo spin.lo yc.lo elf.lo sis.lo uuencode.lo phishcheck.lo phish_domaincheck_db.lo phish_whitelist.lo regex_list.lo sha256.lo mspack.lo cab.lo entconv.lo hashtab.lo dconf.lo lockdb.lo -liconv -lz -lbz2 -lgmp -lpthread -lc_r cc -shared .libs/matcher-ac.o .libs/matcher-bm.o .libs/matcher-ncore.o .libs/matcher.o .libs/md5.o .libs/others.o .libs/readdb.o .libs/cvd.o .libs/dsig.o .libs/str.o .libs/scanners.o .libs/filetypes.o .libs/rtf.o .libs/blob.o .libs/mbox.o .libs/message.o .libs/snprintf.o .libs/table.o .libs/text.o .libs/ole2_extract.o .libs/vba_extract.o .libs/msexpand.o .libs/pe.o .libs/upx.o .libs/htmlnorm.o .libs/chmunpack.o .libs/rebuildpe.o .libs/petite.o .libs/wwunpack.o .libs/suecrypt.o .libs/unsp.o .libs/packlibs.o .libs/fsg.o .libs/mew.o .libs/upack.o .libs/line.o .libs/untar.o .libs/unzip.o .libs/special.o .libs/binhex.o .libs/is_tar.o .libs/tnef.o .libs/unrar15.o .libs/unrarvm.o .libs/unrar.o .libs/unrarfilter.o .libs/unrarppm.o .libs/unrar20.o .libs/unrarcmd.o .libs/pdf.o .libs/spin.o .libs/yc.o .libs/elf.o .libs/sis.o .libs/uuencode.o .libs/phishcheck.o .libs/phish_domaincheck_db.o .libs/phish_whitelist.o .libs/regex_list.o .libs/sha256.o .libs/mspack.o .libs/cab.o .libs/entconv.o .libs/hashtab.o .libs/dconf.o .libs/lockdb.o -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -pthread -liconv -lz -lbz2 /usr/local/lib/libgmp.so -lpthread -pthread -pthread -pthread -Wl,-soname -Wl,libclamav.so.1 -o .libs/libclamav.so.1 /usr/libexec/elf/ld: cannot find -lpthread *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav/work/clamav-0.90/libclamav. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav/work/clamav-0.90. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav/work/clamav-0.90. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav. bsd-ns2# Regards, Nicki ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
