On Friday 16 February 2007 16:02, Robert Allerstorfer wrote:
Enabling the experimental code in 0.90 is dangerous because there has
been introduced a critical bug after the last release candidate has
been released, unfortunately without giving us a chance to test before
releasing it as final
On Friday 16 February 2007 04:14, Dennis Peterson wrote:
carren stuart wrote:
Jim Maul wrote:
ack. Would you rather someone reply and say wow, that sucks, but i
cant help you?
Actually, yes I would. At least that would be acknowledgment of my
problem and request.
Maybe people are
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 15:17, Steve Brown wrote:
I'm running ClamAV 0.88.2 via daemontools and qscanq for use with
qmail. I've been having an issue with clamd not being unable to
allocate memory. From the logs (as an example):
Can you tie your problems up with particular mails from your
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 18:25, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
On Wed, April 5, 2006 1:08 pm, Rob MacGregor said:
WTF are you doing accepting email's at 200 MB? There are far more
appropriate methods of file transfer than SMTP!
But they all require more complicated and lasting setups than SMTP,
On Thursday 06 April 2006 19:17, Karolis Dautartas wrote:
Agreed, especially since ClamAV is a general virus-scanning tool and
not specifically for email.
while sending emails of that size and scanning them for viruses is
definately not the best idea, being unable to scan large files on
used all the memory.
I can provide a demonstration mail if needed but I won't send it to the
list :) I understand clamscan doesn't use clamd.conf, but if needed I can
forward that or any other information requested.
Thank you,
Nick Leverton
___
http
