Hi there,
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users wrote:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 07:53:24 +0200
Damian via clamav-users wrote:
The current "stable" Debian is 10/Buster. It has ClamAV 0.103.2, patched by Debian to
"deb10u1" (whatever that implies)
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 07:53:24 +0200
Damian via clamav-users wrote:
> > The current "stable" Debian is 10/Buster. It has ClamAV 0.103.2, patched by
> > Debian to "deb10u1" (whatever that implies)
>
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/clamav
Interesting, but *much*
The current "stable" Debian is 10/Buster. It has ClamAV 0.103.2, patched by Debian to
"deb10u1" (whatever that implies)
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/clamav
___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:32:23 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> can't count on Debian?
They are very conservative, which is usually nice. But for security software,
not so nice.
The current "stable" Debian is 10/Buster. It has ClamAV 0.103.2, patched by
Debian to "deb10u1" (whatever that
On 30.07.21 14:38, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users wrote:
Recently, the bandwidth hogging episodes have resulted in rapid changes to
ClamAV versions, followed by EOL of versions that many people (not
including me) were still using. So recently I have had to spend far more
time on updating ClamAV
On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 02:37:53 +
"Joel Esler (jesler)" wrote:
> > On Jul 30, 2021, at 14:41, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users
> > wrote:
> >
> > (I don't see exactly how a LTS would have helped with the bandwidth issue,
> > but I suppose it wouldn't have made it any more disruptive.)
>
>
> On Jul 30, 2021, at 14:41, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users
> wrote:
>
> (I don't see exactly how a LTS would have helped with the bandwidth issue,
> but I suppose it wouldn't have made it any more disruptive.)
103.2 and 103.3 are much more respectful to bandwidth than any past version.
Citeren Paul Kosinski via clamav-users :
LTS sounds like a great idea!
Recently, the bandwidth hogging episodes have resulted in rapid
changes to ClamAV versions, followed by EOL of versions that many
people (not including me) were still using. So recently I have had
to spend far more
LTS sounds like a great idea!
Recently, the bandwidth hogging episodes have resulted in rapid changes to
ClamAV versions, followed by EOL of versions that many people (not including
me) were still using. So recently I have had to spend far more time on updating
ClamAV than updating anything
Hi All,
In my world, 5 years is short. It use to take me 3 years to get a stable
enough uBuntu kernel to patch in my changes. The 14.0x LTS 4.4.x kernel
never became stable enough.
I will be looking to the industrial Linux at 10 to 25 years for kernels
for the future.
For most of the
> Tuesday, August 18, 2020ClamAV 0.103.0 release candidate
> Monday, September 14, 2020 ClamAV 0.103.0 released
>
> So we are going by the (first) release candidate. OK.
Oops. I was reading off of a spreadsheet. It should be September then. I'll
have to correct the spreadsheet.
To be extremely specific, the LTS version would start with 0.103.3. So that
would be the base version we’d support for LTS.
> On Jul 29, 2021, at 10:06 AM, Andrew C Aitchison via clamav-users
> wrote:
>
>
> Executive Summary:
> An LTS release every two years, supported for three, starting
Executive Summary:
An LTS release every two years, supported for three, starting with 0.103
sound good to me. Thank you.
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users wrote:
For the past couple of months I've been promoting the idea of having
Long Term Support (LTS) feature
On July 28, 2021 11:53:35 PM UTC, "Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users"
wrote:
>
>Hi All,
>
>For the past couple of months I've been promoting the idea of having Long Term
>Support (LTS) feature releases for ClamAV within internal Talos communications.
>
>For the purposes of this
: [clamav-users] Long Term Support (LTS) program proposal
Hi All,
For the past couple of months I've been promoting the idea of having Long
Term Support (LTS) feature releases for ClamAV within internal Talos
communications.
For the purposes of this discussion:
* A "fe
On 2021-07-28 23:53:35, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users wrote:
>
> I would like your feedback.
>
Starting with v0.103 will be really helpful. I've already voiced my
concerns about CMake... As the Gentoo maintainer, the switch is a bit
annoying, since we've been fixing autotools issues
Hi All,
For the past couple of months I've been promoting the idea of having Long Term
Support (LTS) feature releases for ClamAV within internal Talos communications.
For the purposes of this discussion:
* A "feature release" is a version starting with MAJOR.MINOR.0 to include
all PATCH
17 matches
Mail list logo
